Gaskets, Packing & Sealing Devices (U.S. NAICS 339991): An Investor's Primer

1. Overview

Gaskets, packing, and sealing devices are the small, unglamorous parts that keep fluids, gases, and pressure where they belong: the O-ring in a jet-engine actuator, the head gasket in a car, the braided packing around a pump shaft, the high-purity seal inside a semiconductor etch chamber. The U.S. industry classified as NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 339991 covers establishments primarily engaged in making these devices out of any material [4].

Why an investor should care: this is a classic "small part, big consequence" business. A seal is a tiny fraction of the cost of the machine it goes into, but a failure can shut a refinery, ground an aircraft, or scrap a batch of silicon wafers. Buyers therefore pay for proven reliability and engineering qualification, not just the piece of rubber — which gives well-positioned makers durable pricing power. Just as important, every installed pump, engine, and valve needs its seals replaced periodically over a service life measured in years or decades, producing a recurring, high-margin aftermarket [14].

Public versus private ways in: there is no large U.S. pure-play "seals" stock. The clearest large-cap exposure is Enpro (NYSE: NPO) [9][10]. Otherwise, sealing sits as one segment inside diversified industrial companies — Parker Hannifin, Flowserve, Dana, Timken — or inside privately held and foreign-owned giants such as Freudenberg, Trelleborg, and SKF. Private investors mostly reach the space by buying or backing the hundreds of small, specialized U.S. seal-and-gasket shops that make up the fragmented base of the industry.

2. What it is and how it's structured

Scope. NAICS 339991 covers three related product families, made from any material — rubber, PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene, a fluoropolymer better known by the brand Teflon) and other fluoropolymers, metal, graphite, cork, felt, and composites:

• Gaskets — static seals clamped between two stationary surfaces (a head gasket, a flange gasket) [23].
• Packing — compressible material stuffed around a moving shaft to seal it (compression/braided packing).
• Sealing devices — O-rings, oil and grease seals, molded rubber seals, and mechanical face seals that use precisely finished rotating and stationary faces to contain fluid around shafts in pumps, compressors, and mixers [24].

Illustrative products the classification names include O-rings, oil seals, grease seals, molded packings and seals, compression packings, and coaxial mechanical face seals [4].

Production methods. The industry includes molding and curing elastomeric compounds, die cutting and waterjet cutting sheet, stamping and winding metal, braiding fibers, extruding profiles, applying coatings, machining exotic alloys and carbon or ceramic seal faces, and precision lapping. The Fluid Sealing Association distinguishes genuine manufacturing — mixing, molding, machining, forming, weaving, coating, curing, and similar transformation — from merely cutting and reselling finished material [25].

What it excludes (adjacent NAICS codes). The line is drawn by what the establishment primarily makes:

• The raw polymers are made upstream — synthetic rubber in NAICS 325212 and fluoropolymer resins such as PTFE in 325211. This industry buys those materials.
• Rubber and plastic hose and belting is 326220; other general rubber and plastic goods are 326299 and 326199.
• The finished machine — pumps (333914), engines, valves — is classified with its own product even when the maker designs and molds its own seals in-house.

Ownership mix. Fragmented at the base, branded at the top. Federal data count 492 firms, and the largest four control only about a fifth of revenue (see Section 3) — a long tail of owner-operated job-shops. But the recognized brands are mostly units of large diversified or foreign-owned corporations, and a meaningful share of U.S. sealing output is made captively inside those bigger companies.

3. How big it is

Federal ground truth (U.S. Census Bureau). Value of shipments/receipts was about $7.2 billion in the 2022 Economic Census [1]. County Business Patterns for 2023 count roughly 620 establishments, 32,300 employees, and $2.4 billion in annual payroll [1]. The 2022 data count 492 firms [1]. The industry is strikingly unconcentrated: the top 4 firms hold 21.1% of revenue, the top 8 hold 32.5%, the top 20 hold 52.6%, and the top 50 hold 71.7%, with a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI, a standard 0–10,000 concentration measure where below 1,500 is "unconcentrated") of just 199 [1]. The U.S. Small Business Administration sets the small-business size standard for this industry at 600 employees [1].

Private estimates. Market researchers put the standalone U.S. industry a little higher — roughly $7.7 billion in revenue growing about 1.4% a year — reflecting slightly different scoping and timing [2]. The much broader global gaskets-and-seals market (all countries, and a wider product definition that folds in mechanical seals) is estimated at roughly $77 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach the low-$100-billions by the early 2030s at a mid-single-digit growth rate — a forward-looking figure that depends on assumptions about industrial and automotive demand [6][7].

Undercount caveat. The federal 339991 figures understate the true U.S. sealing footprint. Because establishments are classified by their primary product, sealing made captively inside diversified manufacturers — Parker Hannifin's motion-control plants, Flowserve's pump-and-seal service centers, Dana's driveline plants, and the broader auto-supply base — is counted under those companies' main codes, not under 339991. The standalone statistics thus capture the merchant seal-and-gasket makers, not the full economic activity. Additionally, the 620-establishment count is a count of physical locations with paid employees, not companies, brands, or competitors; a multinational may own several establishments, while separate headquarters, warehouses, and service locations may be classified elsewhere.

Trade. Cross-border trade in these products is roughly balanced: one industry-classification dataset put U.S. imports near $3.4 billion and exports near $3.7 billion (around 2018), with Mexico, Japan, and China the leading import sources [3]. Treat these as order-of-magnitude figures rather than current-year precision.

4. The investable universe

There is no large U.S. pure-play. Enpro is the closest thing to a listed sealing specialist; every other name below is a diversified company for which seals are one line of business. Scale figures are total company revenue unless noted, not seal-only.

Major private / non-listed owners. Several of the biggest sealing brands are not directly investable: Freudenberg Sealing Technologies (part of Germany's family-owned Freudenberg Group, and the U.S. Freudenberg-NOK joint venture with Japan's NOK Corp); Federal-Mogul / DRiV sealing lines (now inside Tenneco, owned by private-equity firm Apollo Global Management); Greene Tweed (a fourth-generation family-owned company making high-performance seals for aerospace and semiconductors) [28]; Saint-Gobain Seals; and UTEX Industries. Below them sit hundreds of small U.S. job-shops and regional gasket fabricators — the fragmented long tail and the main target for private buyers.

5. How the money works

Owners in this industry make money on four levers, all specific to precision component manufacturing:

Input costs and pass-through. Raw materials are roughly 60% of production cost — elastomers (nitrile/NBR, EPDM, silicone), PTFE and other fluoropolymers, and metal [22]. Natural-rubber prices swung from about $1.20 to $2.50 per kilogram in the early 2020s, and fluoropolymer prices move too; makers that can't pass those swings through see margins squeezed [22]. Enpro lists PTFE, aramid fibers, specialty elastomers, graphite and carbon, steel, aluminum, resins, chemicals, powders, and common, exotic, and precious metals among its sealing inputs, with limited sources for some materials; it does not hedge commodity exposure and instead relies on customer pricing and operational efficiency [26]. Capacity utilization of molding and machining lines, plus the ability to reprice, drive incremental margins.

The value ladder (material and spec, not volume). Profitability is set far more by what you make than how much. Commodity gaskets (nitrile, cork, paper) are low-margin and price-competitive. High-performance seals — PTFE, and especially FFKM (perfluoroelastomer, the most chemical- and heat-resistant sealing rubber) — carry rich margins because they are qualified into demanding applications. A semiconductor-grade FFKM O-ring can sell for 10–20 times the price of a comparable nitrile part [5]. Mix, materials science, and getting designed into a customer's platform are the real earnings drivers.

Segment profitability. There is no authoritative industry-wide margin figure, but public segment results illustrate the attractive engineered end. Enpro's broader Sealing Technologies segment (which also contains commercial-vehicle components, hygienic hoses and fittings, and analytical sensing products) generated $732.4 million of 2025 sales and $240.7 million of adjusted segment EBITDA — a 32.9% margin, up from 32.6% in 2024 [26]. John Crane — mechanical seals plus support systems, couplings, filtration, and service — reported £1.115 billion of FY2025 revenue and a 23.8% operating margin [27]. These reflect specific, advantaged portfolios, not NAICS averages.

The aftermarket razor-and-blade. Winning the original-equipment (OE) fitment matters mainly because it locks in decades of replacement sales. Aftermarket or recurring revenue represents approximately two-thirds of Enpro's broader Sealing Technologies segment [26]. At John Crane the split is roughly 29% OE / 71% aftermarket; about 90% of seals sold on a project recur in the aftermarket, and the aftermarket lifetime value is estimated at 10–20 times the original sale [14][27]. Flowserve services this installed base through a network of quick-response seal centers and notes that its aftermarket business is generally higher margin than original equipment [11][29]. Recurring, high-margin aftermarket revenue is what makes the best sealing franchises attractive.

Cyclicality. OE demand tracks industrial capital spending, vehicle build rates, and oil-and-gas investment, so it is cyclical; the aftermarket is stickier and cushions downturns because installed equipment keeps needing reseals regardless of the capex cycle. In 2025, Enpro reported strong sealing demand in aerospace, oil and gas, and food and biopharmaceuticals, offset by weak North American commercial-vehicle OEM demand and slow international industrial markets [26].

6. What drives demand

• Oil, gas, and process industries — roughly a quarter of the seals-and-gaskets market: refineries, LNG (liquefied natural gas) plants, pipelines, and chemical plants running at high temperature and pressure. Demand follows the energy capex cycle [5].
• Automotive — the single largest end-market by some measures (around a quarter). The transition from ICE (internal-combustion engine) to EV (electric vehicle) erodes engine and exhaust gasket demand, but EVs add battery-pack, thermal-management, and electric-motor seals — a reshaping of content, not a simple decline [5][21].
• Aerospace — a fast grower, propelled by record aircraft build rates and rising MRO (maintenance, repair, and overhaul) activity on the flying fleet [5].
• Semiconductors and electronics — the fastest-growing end-market (high-single-digit annual growth) and the highest value per part, because chip-making tools require ultra-clean FFKM seals [5].
• General industrial — pumps, compressors, hydraulics, and a fast-growing installed base of industrial robots, each of which consumes multiple seals and feeds the replacement cycle [5].
• Emerging energy applications — hydrogen, carbon capture, LNG, and nuclear power generally require better seals rather than fewer seals. Hydrogen and cryogenic fluids are difficult to contain; carbon-capture compressors and pipelines create demanding pressure and compatibility conditions. John Crane specifically identifies hydrogen and carbon capture alongside oil and gas, pipelines, and power generation as sealing applications [27].

Leak and emissions regulation as a demand driver. EPA identifies worn valve-stem packing, damaged gaskets, and compressor seals as potential leakage sources and notes that vibration, pressure, and temperature cycling accelerate deterioration [30]. Tighter monitoring and repair obligations — including the EPA's oil-and-gas methane rule — encourage improved packing, dry-gas seals, lower-emission flange systems, and condition monitoring [31].

7. Regulation

PFAS and fluoropolymers — the dominant regulatory question. PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, the "forever chemicals") include the fluoropolymers PTFE, FKM (fluoroelastomer), and FFKM that make the industry's highest-value seals possible. A universal PFAS restriction proposed under the EU's REACH chemicals regime (submitted by five member states in 2023 and under review by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, and its committees) explicitly lists sealing applications in scope [18][19][20]. Fluoropolymers may receive conditional, time-limited derogations for "essential uses," but nothing is settled. Industry-commissioned analysis estimates a broad restriction could affect roughly 39,000 European companies and 2.9 million jobs, with large first-year economic costs [20] — figures that are advocacy estimates, not settled fact. The United States has no equivalent universal ban, but EPA's TSCA reporting regime covers manufacture and import of PFAS and PFAS-containing articles [32], and the reach of the EU rule is pushing global material choices; suppliers (Freudenberg unveiled a PFAS-free sealing material in April 2025) are racing to develop substitutes for the most critical applications [18][19]. PTFE and certain fluoroelastomers are difficult to replace in corrosive, high-temperature, and low-friction service; substitutes may not deliver equivalent reliability in the most demanding applications [26].

Product and safety standards. Being qualified to a specification is both a moat and a cost. Relevant regimes include aerospace material and quality standards, API (American Petroleum Institute) standards for oil-and-gas seals, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and USP (U.S. Pharmacopeia) requirements for food and pharmaceutical contact, nuclear codes, and chemical-compliance rules such as REACH and RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances). Requalifying a seal for a new material is slow and expensive, which reinforces incumbents.

Legacy asbestos. Older gaskets and packing frequently contained asbestos; OSHA has documented substitution by aramid, carbon, cellulose, ceramic, glass, and other fibers [33]. The resulting liability from historical products remains a lasting regulatory-and-legal overhang (see Risks).

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

Structure. A fragmented base (HHI around 199) coexists with branded leaders that are segments of much larger firms [1]. The barriers to entry are materials science, qualification/design-in, and aftermarket lock-in — not raw manufacturing scale — which is why hundreds of small shops survive alongside multibillion-dollar players. The Fluid Sealing Association's directory includes Flowserve, John Crane, A.W. Chesterton, Morgan Advanced Materials, SEPCO, W.L. Gore, KLINGER Thermoseal, and numerous private specialists; Enpro contributes Garlock and Technetics [34].

Consolidation. M&A (mergers and acquisitions) is steady. Enpro has reshaped itself around sealing plus advanced surfaces (Garlock, Technetics, STEMCO) [9][10]. Dana sold its off-highway business to Allison Transmission for $2.7 billion in 2025, sharpening its focus and returning capital [13]. Flowserve agreed to a $19 billion "merger of equals" with Chart Industries in mid-2025, but the deal collapsed when Baker Hughes made a superior bid for Chart; Flowserve walked away with a $266 million breakup fee [12]. Foreign consolidators such as Trelleborg and Freudenberg keep bolting on specialists [15]. Private equity is active in consolidating custom fabricators and distributors: Blue Sage Capital's All-State Industries acquired United Gasket in 2025 to add nonmetallic die-cut capacity and broaden its customer base [35]. Expect continued roll-up of small merchant makers by both strategic and private-equity buyers.

9. Risks

• Input-cost and margin risk. With materials ~60% of cost, rubber and fluoropolymer price spikes compress margins when they can't be passed through [22]. Specialty elastomers, graphite, carbon, alloy steels, and engineered polymers can have concentrated supply chains, while tariffs and trade restrictions affect both raw materials and imported finished seals [26].
• PFAS reformulation risk. Regulation of fluoropolymers threatens exactly the highest-value products (PTFE/FKM/FFKM seals) and could force costly requalification; prospective restrictions or supplier exits could raise cost, force reformulation, and require customer requalification [18][19][20][32].
• Asbestos legacy. Garlock (an Enpro company) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2010 amid a wave of asbestos claims — roughly 900,000 over time — after paying more than $1.4 billion in settlements; a reorganization plan was confirmed in 2016 and an asbestos trust now funds claims [16][17]. Any maker of legacy asbestos-containing seals carries similar tail liability. Investors should investigate old product lines, facilities, and claims, though portraying today's industry as principally asbestos-based is misleading given documented substitution [33].
• Automotive mix shift. Secular erosion of ICE engine/exhaust gasket volume as EV adoption rises, only partly offset by new EV sealing content [21].
• Cyclicality. Downturns in industrial, energy, or automotive capital spending hit OE volumes; the aftermarket cushions but does not eliminate the cycle.
• Trade, tariffs, and currency. Import competition (notably from Mexico and Asia) and cross-border supply chains expose margins to tariffs and exchange-rate swings [3].
• Substitution risk. Mechanical seals have displaced packing in many rotating applications because they reduce leakage and maintenance, while improved seal longevity can lengthen replacement cycles. Redesigned equipment can eliminate individual sealing points, and liquid-applied or formed-in-place systems can replace cut gaskets in selected applications.
• Labor and technical-employee risk. Skills in compound formulation, applications engineering, toolmaking, precision machining, lapping, quality assurance, and field service are harder to automate or replace than basic cutting and molding labor. Loss of experienced technical employees can impair qualification, yield, and customer support.
• Product liability. Seals are used in nuclear, aerospace, chemical, pharmaceutical, and energy applications where failures may cause fire, contamination, environmental releases, or prolonged downtime. Qualification records, traceability, insurance, and claims history are material diligence items.

10. How to invest and the outlook

Public routes.

• Purest large-cap exposure: Enpro (NPO) — the closest thing to a listed sealing specialist [9][10].
• Diversified names with meaningful seal content: Parker Hannifin (PH), Flowserve (FLS), Timken (TKR), and Dana (DAN); abroad, Smiths Group (John Crane, London: SMIN), SKF and Trelleborg (Stockholm), and ElringKlinger (Frankfurt). In each, seals are a slice of a larger story, so a stake is a partial bet on this industry.
• Valuation lens (for those who trade the shares): these are valued as industrials, on cash-generative recurring aftermarket revenue and margin mix rather than headline growth. The market pays up for aftermarket density and exposure to high-spec end-markets (aerospace, semiconductors); commodity-gasket exposure gets little premium. (Multiples, yields, and price levels move constantly and are beyond this primer.)

Private routes. The fragmented, owner-operated base of small U.S. seal-and-gasket fabricators — sticky aftermarket cash flow, low technology risk in the commodity tiers — is a natural lower-middle-market industrial roll-up: buy several regional shops, professionalize purchasing and sales, and build density. Backing specialty distributors with in-house conversion capability is an adjacent play. The attractive buy-and-build model combines local response and customer relationships with centralized material purchasing, engineering, digital quoting, and cross-selling. Note that several of the strongest brands (Freudenberg, Greene Tweed) are private or family-owned and not directly investable.

Diligence considerations. Distinguish genuine recurring aftermarket from ordinary repeat low-value orders; verify specified or qualified positions; examine customer, distributor, and supplier concentration; test material-price pass-through; assess technical-employee retention; map PFAS and legacy-asbestos exposure; and separate manufacturing revenue from resale and service. A business described as a "gasket company" may be anything from a defensible materials-science platform to a lightly differentiated sheet converter.

Near-term drivers (forward-looking judgments, not guarantees). The most likely tailwinds are the aerospace build-and-MRO recovery, semiconductor capital spending, and reshoring of U.S. manufacturing, all of which favor high-value seals. The EV transition reshapes automotive content rather than simply shrinking it. PFAS regulation is the key swing factor for the premium fluoropolymer products — a genuine downside risk if restrictions tighten faster than substitutes mature, but also a moat-widener for whoever qualifies compliant alternatives first. The industrial, energy, and automotive capex cycle will set the OE baseline underneath all of it.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau. County Business Patterns (2023), Economic Census (2022), and Economic Census Concentration statistics — NAICS 339991; U.S. Small Business Administration size standards (2023). Provided federal ground-truth statistics. https://data.census.gov/profile/339991_-_Gasket,_packing,_and_sealing_device_manufacturing?g=010XX00US&codeset=naics~339991
2. IBISWorld. Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing (NAICS 339991). 2024. https://www.ibisworld.com/classifications/naics/339991/gasket-packing-and-sealing-device-manufacturing/
3. SICCODE. NAICS Code 339991 — Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing (industry counts and trade data). 2024. https://siccode.com/naics-code/339991/gasket-packing-sealing-device-manufacturing
4. NAICS Association. NAICS Code 339991 — Description and illustrative examples. 2024. https://www.naics.com/naics-code-description/?code=339991
5. Grand View Research. Gaskets And Seals Market Size & Share Report, 2025–2033 (end-market shares; FFKM price premium). 2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/gaskets-seals-market
6. Coherent Market Insights (via openPR). Gaskets and Seals Market to Hit US$105.3 Billion by 2032. 2025. https://www.openpr.com/news/4282427/gaskets-and-seals-market-to-hit-us-105-3-billion-by-2032-as-key
7. SNS Insider (via GlobeNewswire). Gaskets and Seals Market Size to Reach USD 118.57 Billion by 2035. 2026. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/14/3326675/0/en/gaskets-and-seals-market-size-to-skyrocket-usd-118-57-billion-by-2035-on-rising-ev-and-industrial-demand-sns-insider.html
8. Wikipedia. Parker Hannifin. 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Hannifin
9. Enpro Inc. Enpro Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Results. 2026. https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/enpro-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2025-results-introduces-2026-guidance-2026
10. StockStory. Enpro (NPO) Research Report — segments and business overview. 2025. https://stockstory.org/us/stocks/nyse/npo
11. Flowserve Corporation. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results (revenue; seal service network). 2026. https://ir.flowserve.com/news-events/news-details/2026/Flowserve-Corporation-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2025-Results/default.aspx
12. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. Flowserve's $19 Billion Merger of Equals with Chart; and Chart Industries. Chart Industries Terminates Merger Agreement with Flowserve Corporation (GlobeNewswire, 2025). https://www.cravath.com/news-insights/flowserves-dollar19-billion-merger-of-equals-with-chart.html
13. Dana Incorporated. Dana Completes Sale of Off-Highway Business to Allison for $2.7 Billion. 2025. https://www.dana.com/newsroom/press-releases/dana-incorporated-completes-sale-of-off-highway-business/
14. Smiths Group. John Crane Deep Dive — Transcript (OE/aftermarket split and lifetime value). 2023. https://www.smiths.com/media/maqbtrfl/john-crane-deep-dive-2023-full-transcript.pdf
15. Investing.com. Trelleborg Q4 2025 slides: record margins; Sealing Solutions growth. 2026. https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/trelleborg-q4-2025-slides-record-margins-offset-sales-decline-amid-currency-headwinds-93CH-4472240
16. Mesothelioma.com. Garlock Sealing Technologies — Asbestos Use & Trust Fund. 2024. https://www.mesothelioma.com/asbestos-exposure/companies/garlock-sealing-technologies/
17. PR Newswire. Garlock Sealing Technologies Moves Toward a Permanent Resolution of Asbestos Litigation. 2010. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/garlock-sealing-technologies-moves-toward-a-permanent-resolution-of-asbestos-litigation-95682759.html
18. Freudenberg Sealing Technologies. PFAS Update (regulatory status; PFAS-free material). 2025. https://www.fst.com/news-stories/pfas-update/
19. KLINGER Group. PFAS Regulation: Fluoropolymers Under Scrutiny; PFAS and PTFE in the Sealing Industry. 2025. https://www.klinger-international.com/en/news/pfas-update-study-fluoropolymers-sealing-industry/
20. AFT Fluorotec. EU PFAS Restriction: What Fluoropolymer Users Need to Know (scope; impact estimates). 2025. https://www.fluorotec.com/news/blog/eu-pfas-restriction-fluoropolymers-uk-manufacturers/
21. InsideEVs. The Facts Are In: It's Not Looking Good For Internal Combustion (ICE-to-EV transition). 2024. https://insideevs.com/features/724653/ev-slowdown-combustion-engine/
22. Straits Research. Gaskets and Seals Market — cost structure and raw-material pricing. 2024. https://straitsresearch.com/report/gaskets-and-seals-market
23. Fluid Sealing Association. Gaskets. 2025. https://fluidsealing.com/gaskets/
24. Fluid Sealing Association. Mechanical Seals. 2025. https://fluidsealing.com/mechanical-seals/
25. Fluid Sealing Association. Membership Application Form (manufacturing criteria). 2025. https://fluidsealing.com/membership-application-form/
26. Enpro Inc. Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (segment financials, materials, PFAS risk). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1164863/000162828026009798/npo-20251231.htm
27. Smiths Group. Annual Report 2025 (John Crane revenue, margin, aftermarket split). 2025. https://www.smiths.com/media/uwkpyowa/smiths-annual-report-2025.pdf
28. Greene Tweed. Global Code of Conduct 2026 (ownership disclosure). 2026. https://www.gtweed.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Greene-Tweed-Global-Code-of-Conduct-2026.pdf
29. Flowserve Corporation. Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (aftermarket margin commentary). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/30625/000003062526000003/fls-20251231.htm
30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Equipment Leaks (Natural Gas STAR Program). 2025. https://www.epa.gov/natural-gas-star-program/equipment-leaks
31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Biden-Harris Administration Announces Final Rule to Cut Methane Emissions. 2024. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/biden-harris-administration-announces-final-rule-cut-methane-emissions-strengthen-and
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. TSCA Section 8(a)(7) Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for PFAS. 2025. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/tsca-section-8a7-reporting-and-recordkeeping
33. U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational Exposure to Asbestos; Final Rule (substitution documentation). Federal Register, 1994. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/1994-08-10
34. Fluid Sealing Association. Membership Directory. 2025. https://fluidsealing.com/membership/
35. Blue Sage Capital. All-State Industries Expands Die-Cutting Capabilities with Acquisition of United Gasket. 2025. https://www.bluesage.com/news/all-state-industries-expands-die-cutting-capabilities-with-acquisition-of-united-gasket