Special Die and Tool, Die Set, Jig, and Fixture Manufacturing (NAICS 333514)

1. Overview

Almost every mass-produced metal or plastic object — a car door, a soda can, a phone bracket, a surgical implant — is shaped by a custom-built tool that exists only to make that one part. NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 333514 covers the U.S. shops that build those tools: the stamping and forming dies that press sheet metal into shape, the die sets that hold them, and the jigs and fixtures that clamp a part in exactly the right position while it is machined, welded, or inspected [1][4]. A die cuts or forms material in a press; a die set keeps the punch and die aligned; a jig locates a workpiece and guides a cutting operation; and a fixture locates and clamps a workpiece during machining, welding, inspection, or assembly. These are known as tool-and-die shops. Their product is one-off, engineered-to-order, and often costs tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars per tool.

Why an investor should care: this is upstream, "picks-and-shovels" infrastructure for domestic manufacturing. When a company launches a new car model, a new appliance, or a new medical device, it must first buy a fresh set of dies and fixtures. Tooling demand is therefore an early signal of manufacturing capital spending, and the industry sits squarely in the middle of the reshoring and tariff debates.

Public vs. private ways in: this is overwhelmingly a private industry. It is made up of roughly 2,000 mostly family-owned shops averaging about 20 employees each [1][2]. There is no meaningful U.S.-listed pure play; the nearest public exposure includes a Canadian-listed diversified tooling company, a Tokyo-listed die-component supplier, and a few U.S. industrials whose tooling operations sit alongside stamping or fabrication businesses. For most investors the realistic entry point is private: buying, backing, or supplying a shop — not buying a stock.

2. What it is and how it is structured

In scope (333514): custom-made cutting dies, stamping dies, forming dies, die sets, jigs, fixtures, gauges, and special tools built to a specific customer's part design [1][4]. The defining trait is bespoke work — each tool is quoted, engineered, and built as a project, not sold off a shelf.

The typical workflow is engineer-to-order. A customer supplies a part model, production-volume assumptions, material specifications, tolerances, and press or machine constraints. The shop designs the manufacturing process in CAD, simulates forming or assembly where necessary, procures tool steel and standard components, machines the tool using CNC milling, turning, grinding, and wire or sinker EDM, heat-treats and coats wear surfaces, hand-fits the components, and then conducts tryout and dimensional validation. BLS describes tool-and-die work as reading CAD/CAM files, computing dimensions and tolerances, operating conventional and CNC equipment, fitting and grinding components, and testing the finished tool; tolerances may reach 0.0001 inch [15].

What it explicitly excludes — and the adjacent NAICS codes where that work lives:

• Industrial molds (plastic injection molds, die-cast molds, foundry molds) → 333511, Industrial Mold Manufacturing. This is the single most important distinction: "moldmakers" are a separate, closely related industry, even though many shops and customers overlap [4].
• Cutting tools and machine-tool accessories (drill bits, inserts, chucks, toolholders) → 333515, Cutting Tool and Machine Tool Accessory Manufacturing [4].
• The machine tools themselves (the presses, lathes, and machining centers) → 333517, Machine Tool Manufacturing [4].

Ownership mix: predominantly small, closely held, owner-operated shops. Layered on top are (a) private-equity-backed roll-ups assembling multi-plant tooling groups, and (b) captive tool rooms inside large manufacturers — auto, appliance, and aerospace makers that build tooling in-house for their own use. That captive work is classified under the parent's industry, not 333514, so a substantial slice of national tool-and-die activity sits outside these statistics (see the undercount note below).

3. How big it is

Federal figures for the specific industry (prefer these over broad market-research "tooling" numbers, which use a far wider definition):

What the numbers imply: the average shop books roughly $5 million in annual receipts and employs about 20 people, at an average payroll near $69,000 per worker [1][2]. The 2024 median wage for tool-and-die makers was $63,180, and BLS notes that apprenticeships may require several years of paid work and technical instruction [15]. This is a small-business industry.

It is also extraordinarily fragmented. The largest four firms account for just 16.6% of receipts, the top eight for 21.3%, the top 20 for 31.4%, and even the top 50 for only 43.6% [2]. The Herf-Hirschman Index (HHI, a standard concentration measure that runs to 10,000 for a monopoly) is 99.9 — below 100, the federal threshold for an "unconcentrated" market [2]. Very few industries are this dispersed.

Cyclicality in the data: BLS's real-output index (2017 = 100) fell from 87.1 in 2019 to 78.4 in 2020, recovered to 88.9 in 2022, and fell back to 78.9 in 2023 [19]. Unit labor cost reached 132.2 in 2023 on the same base, indicating materially greater labor cost per unit of real output [20]. These series show why nominal backlog growth can coexist with weak margins: pricing may rise while physical output, absorption, and productivity deteriorate.

Undercount / scope caveats (be honest here):

• The ~$9.8 billion federal receipts figure covers only independent, employer tool-and-die shops. The large volume of tooling built inside auto and appliance OEMs' own captive tool rooms is not counted in 333514, so total U.S. tool-and-die activity is larger than the industry statistic.
• Broad market-research figures that value the "U.S. tooling market" at roughly $49–51 billion [11] are not comparable to this code — they bundle molds, cutting tools, machine tools, and consumables. Do not conflate them with 333514.
• Third-party databases give somewhat different company/employment counts (e.g., ~1,600 companies and ~43,800 workers) [12]; the federal figures above are the authoritative baseline. Our source set does not include federal value-added, capital-expenditure, or import/export figures broken out for this code, so those are not stated here.

4. The investable universe

There is no U.S.-listed pure-play tool-and-die company of scale. The table below is the practical menu; note how quickly "public" gives way to "private."

Takeaway: a public-market investor cannot get clean exposure to this industry. MISUMI provides die-component exposure; Mayville and Cleveland-Cliffs provide tooling exposure blended with stamping and fabrication; Exco is the nearest thing to a listed tooling-focused proxy. The real ownership opportunity is private. Exact revenue sensitivities to NAICS 333514 were not established for any of these public issuers.

5. How the money works

A tool-and-die shop is a custom job shop, not a product company. Each tool is a separately quoted, engineered project. Revenue is often tied to design approval, build milestones, tryout, customer acceptance, engineering changes, and later repair or refurbishment. Owners make money by winning projects at a price above fully loaded cost and by keeping expensive machines and scarce skilled labor busy.

The metrics that actually drive the economics of this specific industry:

• Capacity / machine utilization. Computer-numerical-control (CNC) machines cost well into six figures each; a shop only earns its keep when those spindles run at high utilization (top shops push well above 75%) [14]. Idle iron is the enemy. However, holding every machine and toolmaker fully committed leaves no room for high-margin emergency work — shops can improve profitability by preserving capacity for expedited work and explicitly charging customers for speed [25].
• Skilled labor as the binding constraint. A journeyman toolmaker takes years of apprenticeship to train. Available toolmaker hours — not machines or orders — is usually the real ceiling on output (Section 9). Labor is a major economic input because design, process engineering, machining setup, bench fitting, tryout, and troubleshooting remain skill-intensive even in automated shops. BLS reports labor compensation of ~40% of sectoral output [16][18].
• Quoting activity and hit rate. Because work is project-based, the volume of quotes going out and the win rate on them are the leading indicators of revenue. In mid-2025, most shops reported quoting up 20% or more versus six months earlier [9].
• Margins. Healthy shops target roughly 30–60% gross margin on direct job cost (material + labor + machine burden); commodity work runs thinner [14]. Net margins are typically high-single to low-double digits — one benchmark puts top shops near 13.5% net versus about 8% for the rest [14]. Rework, late customer design changes, missed timing, and underquoted engineering hours can turn an apparently full backlog into poor earnings.
• Material cost pass-through. Tool steel, stainless, and aluminum are the main inputs; the ability to pass rising steel prices into quotes protects margin. In 2025 a majority of shops flagged rising tool-steel, stainless, and aluminum costs [9].
• Recurring aftermarket. Once a tool is in production it needs maintenance, repair, and engineering-change work — a steadier revenue stream layered on top of lumpy new-tool projects.

Cash-flow character: lumpy and program-driven. A big stamping-die program can take months to build and bills in milestones; revenue rises and falls with customers' new-product launches rather than steady unit sales. Working capital can expand sharply when a long build absorbs labor and purchased components before a milestone is approved.

6. What drives demand

• New product launches and model changeovers. This is the core driver. Every new vehicle body, appliance, or device design requires a fresh set of dies and fixtures. Automotive is the dominant end market — automotive parts represent on the order of 60% of U.S. metal-stamping demand, and automotive is over 40% of global tooling demand [10]. Of the 55,200 tool-and-die makers employed across the economy in 2024, transportation-equipment manufacturers employed 26%, machinery manufacturers 23%, and fabricated-metal-product manufacturers 20% (these are occupational employment shares, not 333514 customer-revenue shares) [15].
• Manufacturing capital-spending cycle. Tooling is bought ahead of production, so demand tracks — and slightly leads — industrial capex and factory investment.
• Reshoring and tariffs. Onshoring of manufacturing, reinforced by tariffs on imported tooling, steers work back to domestic shops (Sections 7 and 10). Reshoring and supply-chain localization are favorable where proximity, intellectual-property control, emergency service, and launch support outweigh lower offshore build prices. Large dies are expensive to ship and difficult to correct remotely.
• The EV transition — a two-sided driver. Electric vehicles create new tooling needs (battery trays, large structural die-castings, "gigacasting" dies), and molds/dies for EV parts are projected to approach ~28% of automotive tooling demand by 2030. But EV programs use fewer parts and spend roughly 30% less on tooling per vehicle than combustion models — so the mix shift is not straightforwardly additive [8]. Uncertain EV launch schedules can strand supplier engineering capacity.
• Aerospace, defense, and medical devices. Higher-margin, precision niches; shops serving aerospace and medical reported the most optimism in 2025 surveys [9]. These segments impose longer qualification and documentation cycles.
• Lightweighting. The shift to aluminum and high-strength steel changes die requirements and can force customers to re-tool.
• Additive manufacturing (3D printing). Both a demand source (printed fixtures, conformal-cooling inserts) and a competitive/technological pressure on conventional toolmaking. Additive is more often a complement than a wholesale replacement: it can produce conformal cooling passages, inserts, prototypes, and complicated low-volume tooling, but large hardened production dies still require extensive machining, finishing, validation, and repair.
• Digital tooling and low-volume substitutes. Direct laser cutting and CNC machining are stronger substitutes when production volume is too low to amortize hard tooling. Mayville notes its programmable laser-cutting capability can eliminate expensive hard tooling [22]; CNC avoids mold or die expense and shortens low-volume lead time, albeit generally at higher unit cost and with greater material waste.

7. Regulation

This is not a heavily licensed industry; the binding policy levers are trade and workforce rather than product regulation.

• Trade (Section 301 tariffs) — the biggest single policy factor. Under Section 301 of the Trade Act, the U.S. has kept 25% tariffs on molds, dies, and tooling imported from China; the American Mold Builders Association (AMBA) and dozens of U.S. shops lobbied to retain them [6]. These tariffs directly offset the roughly 40% price advantage that Chinese-owned shops have held on comparable tooling [7], and their continuation or reversal materially changes domestic competitiveness.
• Section 232 tariffs on inputs. Trade policy cuts both ways: tariffs may encourage domestic manufacturing and disadvantage imported finished dies, but they also raise the cost or volatility of steel and aluminum inputs. The U.S. raised Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs from 25% to 50% in June 2025 [26].
• Defense/aerospace controls. Shops building tooling for defense and aerospace customers must comply with ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) and related export-control and quality regimes.
• Workplace safety. Standard OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) safety rules apply, as they do to any machining operation. OSHA's manufacturing amputation emphasis program expressly includes NAICS 333514 — machine guarding, lockout/tagout, cranes, powered industrial trucks, noise, and similar hazards are enforcement priorities [27].
• Environmental. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) handling requirements for metalworking fluids, coolants, welding fumes, grinding dust, heat treatment, and waste apply. EPA's metal-fabrication and finishing air rules may apply depending on processes and hazardous-air-pollutant use [28].
• Workforce policy. Apprenticeship funding and immigration policy shape the labor pipeline that is this industry's chief constraint.
• Intellectual property. Tooling embeds a customer's product design; the risk of IP leakage from offshore sourcing is itself a (non-statutory) driver of domestic demand.

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

• Hyper-fragmentation. With an HHI of 99.9 and the top four firms at just 16.6% of receipts, this is one of the most dispersed manufacturing industries in the country [2]. Competition is local, relationship-driven, and reputation-based.
• Import competition. Low-cost-country shops — historically China — have undercut domestic pricing by up to ~40% [7]. Domestic shops counter on total cost of ownership: faster delivery, easier design iteration, and IP protection [8]. Tariffs (Section 7) tilt the field back toward domestic builders. Customers can still have a low-cost-country supplier rough-machine a tool and retain only tryout, modification, and service domestically — the investable question is not simply "domestic versus imported" but which shop owns the customer relationship and the difficult validation work.
• Private-equity roll-ups. A clear consolidation thesis exists: buy multiple small shops, pool engineering and capacity, and cross-sell across stamping, die-cast, and fixture work. Tooling Tech Group is the archetype, assembled through serial acquisitions under successive PE owners [13]. Tooling Systems Group describes a similar network model [24].
• The succession wave. Because owners are aging (Section 9) and many shops have no internal successor, the industry is a steady source of acquisition targets — and of outright closures. This is simultaneously a risk (capacity attrition) and the central private-market opportunity.
• Captive vs. merchant capacity. Large OEMs can pull tooling in-house or push it out to merchant shops depending on the cycle, adding volatility to independent shops' order books.

9. Risks

• Cyclicality. Demand is tied to customers' capital spending and new-model launches; a pause in auto or industrial investment hits order books quickly and lumpily. BLS real-output data show swings of more than 10% year over year [19].
• Customer and end-market concentration. Heavy dependence on automotive means an auto downturn — or a stall in the EV transition — flows straight through.
• EV uncertainty. Lower tooling spend per EV and slower-than-expected EV adoption both cut into the industry's largest demand pool [8].
• Workforce and succession — the structural risk. By industry estimates, roughly three-quarters of tool-and-die makers are over 45, about 40% are eligible to retire within 5–7 years, and only ~2% are under 35 [8]. Too few apprentices are entering to replace them. This caps growth and threatens shop continuity independent of demand. BLS projects tool-and-die-maker employment to decline 11% between 2024 and 2034, from 55,200 to 49,300, because CNC equipment and software allow fewer workers to perform some traditional tasks [15]. The labor risk is not merely wage inflation but loss of tacit process knowledge — toolmakers must understand springback, heat-treatment distortion, press behavior, wear, clearances, and how to correct a tool under deadline.
• Trade-policy reversal. If Section 301 tariffs were removed, the ~40% offshore price gap would reopen and pressure domestic volumes [6][7].
• Input-cost inflation. Rising tool-steel, stainless, and aluminum prices squeeze fixed-price project margins when they cannot be fully passed through [9]. Section 232 tariff increases on steel and aluminum add cost pressure [26].
• Capital intensity and technology risk. High-value CNC and additive equipment must be kept utilized; falling behind on technology (5-axis, additive, automation) erodes competitiveness.
• Small-shop fragility. Thin balance sheets, owner-dependence, and single-customer exposure make individual shops vulnerable to a single lost program or a founder's retirement.
• Commercial risks. Customer concentration, launch cancellations, uncompensated engineering changes, fixed-price overruns, acceptance disputes, warranties, liability for delayed customer production, and customer ownership of tooling held on the supplier's floor. A backlog should be discounted for cancellation rights, remaining engineering risk, customer-furnished designs, and the amount already billed.

10. How to invest and the outlook

Public routes (limited). There is no U.S.-listed pure play. The nearest listed proxies are Exco Technologies (TSX: XTC), whose casting-and-extrusion tooling segment gives partial exposure alongside its automotive-components business [5]; MISUMI (TYO: 9962), which owns Dayton Lamina/Dayton Progress/Anchor Lamina for die-component exposure [21]; and Mayville Engineering (NYSE: MEC), which designs and builds progressive dies within a broader fabrication and stamping business [22]. Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE: CLF) provides highly diluted exposure through its Tooling and Stamping operation [23]. Kennametal (NYSE: KMT) and Lincoln Electric (NASDAQ: LECO) offer tooling adjacency through cutting tools and consumables, but sit in neighboring codes, not in custom die-and-fixture work. A public-market investor essentially cannot own this industry directly, and exact revenue sensitivities to NAICS 333514 are not disclosed.

Private routes (where the real access is). The aging-owner succession wave, combined with reshoring tailwinds, makes direct ownership the live opportunity: acquiring and professionalizing individual shops (the search-fund/independent-sponsor model), backing a PE roll-up such as Tooling Tech Group [13], or investing as a supplier/partner to reshored manufacturing programs. Scale, engineering depth, and a trained workforce are the assets that command a premium in a fragmented field. The principal diligence items are revenue by tool type and end market; new-build versus repair mix; customer and platform concentration; backlog conversion and cancellation terms; engineering-change recovery; quoted versus actual hours; machine utilization; scrap and rework; on-time delivery; workforce age and apprenticeship pipeline; customer ownership of work in process; environmental liabilities; and the replacement cost of CNC, EDM, press, crane, and metrology assets.

An investor can also take "picks-and-shovels" exposure through CNC and EDM machine builders, CAD/CAM and forming-simulation software, metrology, industrial automation, specialty tool steel, coatings, and standard die-component suppliers. Those routes are more liquid but increasingly reflect the economics of broader factory capital spending rather than the earnings of custom 333514 shops themselves.

Near-term drivers (forward-looking judgment, not reported fact). The setup is cautiously constructive. Reshoring momentum and retained Section 301 tariffs favor domestic shops [6]; quoting activity was up 20%-plus and capacity utilization was climbing toward the high-70s in 2025 [9]. Against that, the auto/EV transition is an ambiguous demand driver [8], material-cost inflation is squeezing margins [9], and the shortage of skilled toolmakers is a hard ceiling on how fast the industry can grow into any reshoring boom [8]. The likeliest path is a modestly growing, steadily consolidating industry in which value accrues to the operators who solve the workforce problem and build scale — a private-market story more than a public one.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau. "County Business Patterns (CBP), 2023 — NAICS 333514" (establishments, employment, annual payroll). 2025. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
2. U.S. Census Bureau. "2022 Economic Census — Concentration statistics, NAICS 333514" (firms, receipts, CR4/CR8/CR20/CR50, HHI). 2025. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
3. U.S. Small Business Administration. "Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to NAICS Codes" (NAICS 333514: 500 employees). 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
4. U.S. Census Bureau. "2022 NAICS Definitions — 333514 Special Die and Tool, Die Set, Jig, and Fixture Manufacturing (and 333511, 333515, 333517)." 2022. https://www.census.gov/naics/
5. Exco Technologies Limited. "Announces Results for Fourth Quarter and Year Ended September 30, 2024" (record sales C$637.8M; segment detail). GlobeNewswire, 2024. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/11/27/2988460/0/en/Exco-Technologies-Limited-Announces-Results-for-Fourth-Quarter-and-Year-Ended-September-30-2024.html
6. MoldMaking Technology / American Mold Builders Association (AMBA). "AMBA Applauds U.S. Administration's Retention of Chinese Mold Tariffs" (25% Section 301 tariffs on molds, dies, tooling retained). 2024. https://www.moldmakingtechnology.com/news/amba-applauds-us-administrations-retention-of-chinese-mold-tariffs
7. MoldMaking Technology. "More Than 60 U.S. Mold Manufacturers Rally to Keep China Tariffs" (Chinese shops up to ~40% below domestic cost). 2022. https://www.moldmakingtechnology.com/news/more-than-60-us-mold-manufacturers-rally-to-keep-china-tariffs
8. JEELIX. "US Tool and Die: The State of the Industry" (workforce demographics; EV tooling ~28% of auto mold demand by 2030 and ~30% lower tooling spend per EV; total-cost-of-ownership). 2024. https://www.jeelix.com/us-tool-and-die-the-state-of-the-industry/
9. American Mold Builder / MoldMaking Technology. "AMBA Business Forecast Survey 2025" (capacity utilization ~71%→73%→77%; quoting up 20%+; tool-steel/aluminum cost inflation). 2025. https://americanmoldbuilder.com/articles/2025/industry-advocacy-leads-to-optimistic-conditions-while-highlighting-challenge/
10. Grand View Research. "Metal Stamping Market Size And Share Report, 2026–2033" (automotive ~60% of U.S. metal stamping; automotive >40% of global tooling demand). 2025. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/metal-stamping-market
11. IMARC Group. "United States Tooling Market Size & Growth Forecast" (broad U.S. tooling market ~$49–51B; wider scope than NAICS 333514). 2025. https://www.imarcgroup.com/united-states-tooling-market
12. IBISWorld. "NAICS Code 333514 — Special Die and Tool, Die Set, Jig, and Fixture Manufacturing" (third-party company and employment estimates). 2025. https://www.ibisworld.com/classifications/naics/333514/special-die-and-tool-die-set-jig-and-fixture-manufacturing/
13. Tooling Tech Group / PitchBook / PE Hub / GenNx360 Capital Partners. "Our History of Growth" and roll-up acquisition coverage (PE-backed tooling consolidation). 2015–2026. https://toolingtechgroup.com/about-tooling-tech-group/our-history-of-growth/
14. Modern Machine Shop / CADDi. "See How You Stack Up" and "Job Shop Pricing Strategies" (job-shop margins ~30–60% on direct cost; top shops ~13.5% net vs ~8%; >75% machine utilization targets). 2024. https://www.mmsonline.com/articles/see-how-you-stack-up
15. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Occupational Outlook Handbook: Machinists and Tool and Die Makers" (work description, tolerances, apprenticeship, median wage $63,180 in 2024, employment projections −11% 2024–2034). 2025. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/production/machinists-and-tool-and-die-makers.htm
16. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via FRED. "NAICS 333514 Sectoral Output, Current Dollars" ($9.848B in 2022, $9.150B in 2023). 2025. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUEN333514T300000000
17. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via FRED. "NAICS 333514 All Persons Employment" (53,900 in 2022; 49,000 in 2025). 2025. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUEN333514W200000000
18. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via FRED. "NAICS 333514 Labor Compensation" ($3.679B in 2023). 2025. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUEN333514L020000000
19. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via FRED. "NAICS 333514 Real Sectoral Output Index" (2017=100; 87.1 in 2019, 78.4 in 2020, 88.9 in 2022, 78.9 in 2023). 2025. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUEN333514T010000000
20. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via FRED. "NAICS 333514 Unit Labor Cost Index" (2017=100; 132.2 in 2023). 2025. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUEN333514U100000000
21. MISUMI Group Inc. "Global Network" (owns Dayton Lamina, Dayton Progress, Anchor Lamina). 2025. https://www.misumi.co.jp/english/about/company/global/
22. Mayville Engineering Company. "2025 Form 10-K" (progressive-die design/build, laser-cutting as hard-tooling alternative). SEC EDGAR, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1766368/000110465926023496/tmb-20251231x10k.htm
23. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. "2025 Annual Report" (Tooling and Stamping segment disclosure). SEC EDGAR, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/764065/000076406526000058/clf2025formars.pdf
24. Tooling Systems Group. "About" (network of 12 tooling companies, 600+ employees). 2025. https://toolingsystemsgroup.com/about/
25. NTMA. "How Modern Quoting Technology Can Help You Value Your Shop's Time" (dynamic lead-time pricing, capacity option value). The Record, February 2025. https://ntma.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/The-Record-Feburary-2025-compressed-compressed-compressed.pdf
26. The White House. "Adjusting Imports of Aluminum and Steel into the United States" (Section 232 tariffs raised from 25% to 50%, June 2025). 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/06/adjusting-imports-of-aluminum-and-steel-into-the-united-states/
27. OSHA. "National Emphasis Program on Manufacturing Amputations" (CPL 03-00-027; NAICS 333514 expressly included). 2023. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/directives/CPL-03-00-027.pdf
28. EPA. "Metal Fabrication and Finishing Source Categories" (NAICS/SIC codes, hazardous air pollutant rules). 2025. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/metal-fabrication-and-finishing-source-categories-naicssic-code