Beef Cattle Ranching and Farming, including Feedlots (U.S.) — NAICS 11211

NAICS = North American Industry Classification System, the U.S. federal standard for grouping businesses by activity. This primer covers the 2022 revision, industry code 11211 — a five-digit "industry" that rolls up two child industries: 112111 (Beef Cattle Ranching and Farming) and 112112 (Cattle Feedlots). It synthesizes the two child primers plus federal statistics for this level. Tickers, prices, and multiples are reserved for the investable-universe and how-to-invest sections; every acronym is defined on first use.

1. Overview

NAICS 11211 is the cattle-raising half of the U.S. beef supply chain — everything from the breeding cow to the finished, slaughter-ready steer, but stopping short of the packing plant. It bundles two stages that are biologically continuous but economically opposite:

breeding cows → calves → stocker/backgrounding cattle (112111) → feedlots (112112) → beef packers (311611) → retailers & restaurants

Cattle and calves are the single largest source of U.S. farm cash receipts among animal products — about $112.1 billion in 2024, roughly 41.7% of all livestock and animal-product receipts, more than poultry, dairy, or any individual crop [7]. Most of that value is created on the ranch and traded through the feedlot — the two children of this code. The packers and retailers downstream sit in other NAICS codes.

Why it matters to an investor of any kind: this is the industry that sets the supply — and much of the price — of the most valuable animal protein in the U.S. food system, and in 2025–2026 it sits at a rare extreme. The national herd is at its lowest level in about 75 years and cattle prices have hit record highs [3][4][17]. The crucial insight for this level is that the same shortage that enriches one child is squeezing the other. When cattle are scarce, the rancher who owns the animal captures record profit, while the feedlot that must buy the animal to finish it sees its margin compressed [19]. Owning the cow and feeding the cow are, right now, nearly mirror-image bets — and that contrast is the heart of this rollup.

Both children are, at their core, private, real-asset businesses. There is no large, clean, publicly traded pure-play for either cow-calf ranching or cattle feeding. Public-market investors reach the theme indirectly (downstream packers, a listed ranch-land company, cattle futures); private investors reach it directly, the way the industry is actually owned — land, herds, pasture leases, and feedyards.

2. What's inside — the two child industries, and how they differ

The level splits cleanly into an upstream, land-based, family-dominated tier and a downstream, capital-intensive, consolidated finishing tier. They share one master variable — the multi-year cattle cycle — but pull profit in opposite directions within it.

The through-line. Read top to bottom, the table tells one story: 112111 is where the animal and the land are owned, and it currently captures the cycle's profit; 112112 is where the animal is processed toward slaughter, and it currently pays the price of scarcity. Both are private by nature, but their ownership textures differ — ranching is a long tail of family operations under a few large dynasties and institutions, while feeding is a barbell of a few very large commercial yards over many small ones. Neither offers a public pure-play; the listed exposure for both sits downstream (packers) or sideways (land).

3. How big it is (this level's rollup)

A note on our figures. Our ingested ground-truth stats file for NAICS 11211 contains no metrics — there are no ingested stat_metrics for this node. Every number below is therefore drawn from the labeled public sources carried up from the two child primers (USDA and SBA, principally), not from an internal dataset. Where a clean level-wide figure does not exist in federal data, this primer says so rather than inventing one.

Physical size (current inventory).

• 86.2 million head of all cattle and calves as of January 1, 2026 — the smallest total since the early 1950s, roughly a 75-year low [3][4]. Of that, this level's two children hold the two big pools:
• 27.6 million beef cows (the breeding herd — 112111), down ~1% year over year [3];
• 13.8 million cattle on feed (112112), of which 1,000-head-and-larger lots hold ~82.7% [3].
• The 2025 calf crop was about 32.9 million head, down ~2% and, on some measures, the smallest since 1941 [3][17].

Structure (2022 Census of Agriculture — the most NAICS-aligned counts).

• 622,162 farms held beef cows; average herd 47 cows; 55% ran fewer than 20; <1% held 1,000+. The roughly one-tenth of operations with 100+ cows hold ~60% of all beef cows [5].
• 534,633 farms specialized in beef cattle ranching, reporting $32.2 billion of cattle/calf sales — the closest Census proxy to the ranching child's revenue [6].
• 25,783 farms sold cattle on feed (the feedlot child), down from 30,273 in 2017 — most of them small, while a few thousand large commercial yards do the overwhelming majority of finishing [9].

Economic value (level-wide).

• Cattle and calf cash receipts were $112.1 billion in 2024 — 41.7% of all U.S. animal-product receipts and the single largest commodity [7]. This is the umbrella figure both children feed into (it also captures some dairy-origin cattle sales, so read it as the beef-complex receipts line, not a pure 11211 total).
• SBA size standards (SBA = U.S. Small Business Administration) differ sharply between the two children and are revealing: a beef-ranching operation counts as a small business up to $2.5 million in average annual receipts, but a cattle feedlot up to $22.0 million [1]. The feedlot ceiling is nearly 9× higher because feed passes through a yard as revenue, inflating receipts relative to true margin — a reminder that gross revenue is a poor gauge of where profit actually sits in this level.

Undercount caveat (significant at this level). Do not expect the usual "business statistics" here. County Business Patterns (CBP) — the normal source for employer-firm counts and payroll — excludes crop and animal production (NAICS 111 and 112) and excludes businesses without employees [45]. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) likewise excludes the self-employed and most agricultural workers on small farms [46]. So the authoritative counts come from USDA's (U.S. Department of Agriculture) Census of Agriculture and NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) surveys, not the business register [5][6]. Because the ranching child is dominated by very small, often individually owned operations, any employer-firm lens badly understates this level's footprint — the honest way to size it is by head of cattle, number of farms, and the receipts-based SBA standard. The two USDA lenses even pull in opposite directions: farm counts understate the sector's economic weight where small operators dominate (ranching), yet can overstate the number of economically meaningful feeders, because commercial finishing is really a few thousand large yards (feedlots) [9][10].

4. The investable universe — where value concentrates across the children

There is no pure-play public company for either child. Both the cow-calf/stocker business and the cattle-feeding business are private by nature. Listed exposure sits downstream (packers), sideways (ranch land), or in cattle futures — each an imperfect proxy and, in the packers' case, an inverse bet on the cycle (see §5, §10). Tickers and values below are for the investable-access discussion only.

Public / listed proxies (shared across both children):

Exchanges: NYSE and NASDAQ are U.S. stock exchanges; B3 is Brazil's. Two of the four dominant U.S. packers are effectively private — Cargill is wholly private, and National Beef is majority-owned by MBRF (Marfrig) with a minority producer stake — so even the concentrated packing tier is only partly reachable in public markets [20].

Where the private ownership really sits (and how it differs by child):

• Ranching (112111) — held as land and herds: family dynasties and land companies such as King Ranch (~825,000 acres, plus a 50% stake in the Cobalt Cattle feedyard) and the W.T. Waggoner Estate Ranch (~524,000 acres) [39]; institutional operators such as AgReserves / Farmland Reserve (Deseret cattle operations among the largest in the U.S.) [40]; and producer-owned processing such as U.S. Premium Beef (USPB), whose rancher-members hold an interest in National Beef [41].
• Feedlots (112112) — held as commercial yards, and more consolidated: Five Rivers Cattle Feeding (~870,000 head one-time capacity, the largest in North America; owned by Pinnacle Asset Management/Arcadia), Cactus Feeders (~628,000 head, 100% employee-owned/ESOP), Friona Industries (~610,000 head), Cobalt Cattle (~355,000 head), and J.R. Simplot (~230,000 head), alongside thousands of small family yards [23].

The practical takeaway: value and ownership concentrate differently across the two children. In ranching, the asset is land plus a breeding herd spread across hundreds of thousands of owners; in feeding, it is a working yard concentrated in a few dozen large operators. Public equity captures neither cleanly.

5. How the money works

This level contains two different margin businesses stacked in sequence, and the difference is the whole point.

Upstream (112111) — a biological, land-based margin on the cow. Revenue per cow ≈ (calves weaned per 100 cows) × (weaning weight) × (price per hundredweight, "cwt" = 100 lb). Getting a live calf from nearly every cow each year is the biggest income driver; cull-cow sales add to it. Cost per cow is dominated by feed and pasture — national cash operating cost plus pasture rent ran about $1,059 per cow in 2025, up ~29% over five years [14][15]. But the land is the balance sheet: pasture and rangeland are the dominant asset, the breeding herd is working capital, and land can appreciate while the cattle enterprise merely breaks even. In 2025 the economics were historic — CattleFax pegged average calf revenue at $2,246 per head (up $631 from 2024), lifting cow-calf profit by roughly $614 per head [16].

Downstream (112112) — a spread on the finished head. Profit per head at "closeout" ≈ (final weight × fed-cattle price + grid premiums) − (feeder-animal cost + feed + yardage + interest + vet/freight + death loss). Because the feeder animal is bought at one commodity price, fattened with a second (corn), and sold at a third (fed cattle), feeders think in terms of the "cattle crush" — the relationship among those three prices [12]. Corn alone explains about two-thirds of the variation in cost of gain [13]. Feeders can also earn a service income via custom feeding: the customer owns the cattle and pays yardage plus feed (posting ~25–30% equity), so the yard earns a fee while the owner bears price risk [12]. U.S. finishing breakevens climbed from ~$174/cwt (2023) to ~$205 (2025) and toward ~$248 in early 2026 as feeder-calf costs surged [12].

Why the two diverge right now. The cattle cycle — an ~8–12-year swing driven by how slowly cows breed — is the master variable for both children, but it hits them with opposite sign. Beef-cow culling has fallen from a 13.2% peak in 2022 to 8.4% in 2025, and the herd is contracting [17]. Scarce cattle mean record calf and feeder prices — a windfall for the rancher selling the animal, but a cost shock for the feedlot that must buy it. Net feedlot returns averaged ~$312/head from January–October 2025 (the best stretch in a decade), then flipped to losses from December 2025 into March 2026 as record feeder costs bit [12]. In short: when cattle are dear, 112111 captures the profit and 112112 gets squeezed — and the packers below them (see §8) are squeezed too [19].

Managing the risk (both children). Producers and feeders hedge with CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) live-cattle (LE) and feeder-cattle (GF) futures and options [35], and with USDA insurance: Livestock Gross Margin (LGM) protects the value-minus-cost spread and Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) insures against price declines [25].

6. What drives demand

• Domestic beef demand. The U.S. is the world's largest beef-consuming market, with a strong preference for grain-fed beef [8]. Per-capita consumption held near 59.3 lb in 2025, and a beef-demand index reached 138 in 2025, up 27% from 2019, resilient even at record retail prices (ground beef ~$6.25/lb mid-2025) [34][17].
• Derived demand for cattle — and the corn link. A rancher sells not to consumers but to stockers and feedlots, and a feedlot's willingness to bid for calves hinges on both expected fed-cattle prices and corn/feed costs. Cheap corn lets feedlots bid up for calves; expensive corn does the opposite — so corn is a demand driver for the ranching child and a cost driver for the feeding child simultaneously [13][18].
• The cattle cycle and feeder-calf supply — the dominant driver. Scarce calves (2025 crop ~32.9M, down ~2%) drove USDA's projection of roughly $364/cwt for 750–800 lb feeders in 2026, up ~13% — great for the rancher, tough for the feeder [3][18].
• Exports and imports. U.S. beef exports were worth about $10.45 billion in 2024 (~3.0 billion lb), led by Japan, South Korea, and China [32]. The U.S. is now a large net importer — imports climbed to roughly 17% of supply by 2025, an all-time high, mostly lean trim blended into ground beef [33].
• Competing proteins and pasture. Chicken and pork prices cap beef demand, and drought/forage conditions decide whether ranchers expand or liquidate — often mattering more to ranch profit than modest swings in total beef demand.

7. Regulation

Regulation touches the two children unevenly — lightest on the pasture-based ranch, heaviest on the confined feedlot and downstream packer.

• Meat inspection & food safety. USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) runs mandatory federal inspection at slaughter and processing — downstream of this level, but the food-safety frame the whole chain feeds into.
• Animal health & traceability. USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) controls animal disease and, under a 2024 rule, requires official electronically readable ear tags for covered cattle moving interstate [29].
• Animal drugs & feed (feedlot-weighted). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates feed additives, growth-promotant implants, and, under the Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD), requires veterinary authorization for medically important antibiotics in feed [26].
• Water & manure (feedlot-weighted). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines an Animal Feeding Operation (AFO) by confinement/feeding for ≥45 days a year; larger Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) need a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and a nutrient-management plan [27]. This bites mainly on the feeding child (112112), far less on pasture cow-calf.
• Federal grazing (ranch-weighted). Western ranchers depend on Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service permits, priced per animal-unit-month (AUM) [—].
• Market conduct. The Packers and Stockyards Act (P&S Act), enforced by USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), polices unfair, deceptive, and anticompetitive practices in livestock trading [28], and Livestock Mandatory Reporting (LMR) requires packers to report cattle purchase prices so sellers can see the market [21]. Both sit at the center of the concentration debate (§8).
• Labeling & checkoff. Mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) for beef was repealed in 2015; USDA finalized a voluntary "Product of USA" rule in 2024 [31]. A mandatory $1-per-head beef "checkoff" funds industry marketing.
• Trade/animal-movement controls. In response to the New World screwworm, USDA suspended live-animal imports across the southern border in 2025 — a border/health measure with direct supply effects (§9) [30].

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

The defining structural fact of this level is hundreds of thousands of sellers facing a handful of buyers, and the concentration rises sharply as you move down the chain.

• Ranching (112111): a fragmented base, gently concentrating. ~622,000 operations compete as price-takers; land, water, forage, and genetics resist standardization, so consolidation is slow — but real, with ~10% of farms (100+ cows) already holding ~60% of the herd, and aging operators plus high land prices nudging concentration upward [5].
• Feeding (112112): already consolidated. Lots selling 1,000+ head are ~7% of feedlots but market ~88% of fed cattle; 50,000+-head yards hold ~35% of inventory — a barbell of a few very large groups over many small yards [8][10].
• Packing (downstream, 311611): the most concentrated of all. The "Big Four" — Tyson, JBS, Cargill, and National Beef — handle roughly 85% of U.S. steer-and-heifer slaughter, up from ~25% in 1977 and ~71% in 1992 [20][21]. Feedlots and, ultimately, ranchers sell into a near-oligopsony (a market with very few buyers). That tension is live: in 2025–2026 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) intensified a criminal antitrust investigation into the largest beef processors over alleged price-fixing and procurement fraud, and the administration has publicly targeted packer concentration [22].

Consolidation across this level is more likely to advance through contracts, producer-owned processing, feedlot relationships, land aggregation, and vertical integration than through wholesale replacement of independent ranches. Access to water, low-cost forage, reliable buyers, genetics, and succession capital may matter more than acreage alone.

9. Risks

• Cattle-cycle / price risk (opposite by child). Today's record prices are a cycle top. For ranchers, the risk is buying breeding stock at 2025–26 prices before a downturn; for feedlots, the risk is a margin whipsaw — the feeder-to-fed spread plus corn can flip a large per-head profit into a large loss within a quarter, as it did in late 2025 [12][17].
• Drought, heat, and forage. Multi-year drought drove the 2021–2023 liquidation behind today's shortage; forage and water availability gate ranch profitability and can force liquidation.
• Feed, fuel, labor, and interest costs. Corn and hay prices swing feeding economics and the price paid for calves; cattle feeding is heavily financed, so interest rates feed directly into the closeout [12][13].
• Disease. The New World screwworm (a flesh-eating parasite) has spread north through Mexico; the U.S. suspended southern-border live-cattle imports in 2025 and APHIS confirmed a U.S. case in Zavala County, Texas — a genuine threat to supply and to herd rebuilding [30]. Foot-and-mouth disease and H5N1 (bird flu, which reached dairy cattle in 2024) are tail risks that could shut exports overnight.
• Buyer concentration. Both children ultimately sell into a near-oligopsony of packers, weakening negotiating power and widening basis risk (§8) [20].
• Trade and policy. Heavy reliance on imported lean trim and on export markets makes the level sensitive to tariffs and trade disputes, and the DOJ packer probe could reshape how cattle are sold [22][32][33].
• Capital intensity and thin margins. Land, cattle, equipment, and interest costs are large; in an ordinary year net margin per cow — or per finished head — is often only a few hundred dollars, so leverage and rate risk cut deep.
• For investors specifically. There is no liquid pure-play equity for either child; futures are leveraged and volatile; and downstream packer stocks are an inverse bet — they suffer, not benefit, when cattle are scarce and dear [19][36].

10. How to invest, and the outlook

Match the vehicle to the child — and to the cycle.

Public-market routes (all indirect, shared across both children):

• Processor equities — Tyson (TSN), JBS (JBS), Hormel (HRL) — the most liquid way to trade the beef theme, but note the direction: high cattle prices compress processor margins, so packer stocks are not a proxy for a bullish rancher's position [19][36][37]. Analyze by segment, not company-wide revenue.
• Listed land — Tejon Ranch (TRC) is the rare NYSE-listed company with real ranch-land and grazing exposure, though it is a diversified land play, not a cattle operator [38]. Farmland REITs (LAND, FPI) are a distant, mostly-cropland proxy [43].
• Cattle futures/ETNs — CME live cattle (LE) and feeder cattle (GF) are the direct price exposure [35]; the iPath Livestock ETN (COW) offers stock-like access but blends cattle with hogs and bears roll cost [42]. All are leveraged and not buy-and-hold vehicles.

Private routes (how the level is really owned):

• For the ranching child (112111): direct ranch/land ownership, pasture leases, custom-grazing a cow herd, ag-land partnerships, producer-owned processing (e.g. USPB), and direct-to-consumer branded beef. Underwrite land and the operating business separately — title, leases, and grazing permits; water rights and drought resilience; stocking rate; calving/weaning/death-loss records; hedging and insurance; and succession [41].
• For the feeding child (112112): retained ownership / custom feeding (own cattle, pay a yard yardage + feed, ~25–30% equity) captures the finishing margin without building a yard; direct yard ownership is operationally intensive and cyclical [12]. Prioritize operators with low cost of gain, strong feed procurement, diversified packer access, disciplined hedging, and permits in hand.

Outlook (forward-looking judgment, not a forecast of record). Entering 2026 the setup is a genuine extreme: the smallest herd in about 75 years, with heifer retention still stalled [3][4][17]. That points to continued tight cattle supply and historically strong calf and feeder prices in the near term — favoring owners who already have cattle to sell (112111), and squeezing the feedlots that must buy them (112112). USDA ERS's July 2026 outlook forecast a slaughter-steer price around $251/cwt in 2026 and ~$254 in 2027 — but against feedlot breakevens climbing toward ~$248, that implies razor-thin finishing margins [12][44]. The mirror image is real risk for anyone buying in now at record prices, for feedlots and packers whose margins stay squeezed, and for the eventual rebuilding cycle that, once it turns, historically ends in oversupply and falling prices [19]. The wildcards — screwworm and trade policy — could sharply move both supply and prices. A durable thesis at this level should not rest on high cattle prices alone: the best operators in either child are distinguished by low-cost forage or feed, dependable water, strong genetics, disciplined working capital, and reliable market access. In short, a cyclical peak that is excellent to be selling into (own the cow) and expensive to be buying into (feed the cow).

---

Sources

1. U.S. Small Business Administration / U.S. Government Publishing Office. "Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to NAICS Codes" and "13 CFR Part 121" (112111 = $2.5M; 112112 = $22.0M average annual receipts), 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
2. U.S. Census Bureau / NAICS. "112111 Beef Cattle Ranching and Farming," "112112 Cattle Feedlots," "112120 Dairy Cattle and Milk Production," "311611 Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering" definitions, 2022. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=112111&year=2022
3. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). "Cattle" (Jan. 1, 2026 inventory: 86.2M head; 27.6M beef cows; 13.8M cattle on feed; 2025 calf crop ~32.9M), Jan. 30, 2026. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/catl0126.pdf
4. Texas Farm Bureau. "U.S. cattle inventory drops to 75-year low," 2026. https://texasfarmbureau.org/u-s-cattle-inventory-drops-to-75-year-low/
5. USDA Economic Research Service (ERS). "2022 Census of Agriculture: Majority of Farms with Beef Cows Have Fewer Than 50 Cows" (622,162 farms; avg 47 cows; 55% under 20; ~10% hold ~60% of beef cows), 2024. https://ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=109597
6. USDA NASS. "2022 Census of Agriculture: Cattle Production Highlights" (29.2M beef cows; 534,633 beef-specializing farms with $32.2B cattle/calf sales; $89.4B all cattle/calf sales), 2024. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2024/Census22_HL_Cattle%20and%20Cattle%20on%20Feed_final.pdf
7. USDA ERS. "Cattle/calf receipts comprised the largest portion of U.S. animal/animal-product receipts in 2024" ($112.1B; 41.7%), 2025. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/chart-gallery/chart-detail?chartId=76949
8. USDA ERS. "Cattle & Beef: Sector at a Glance" (feedlots ≥1,000 head = 7% but ~88% of fed cattle; exports/imports; largest producer/consumer), n.d. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/sector-at-a-glance
9. Beef Magazine (Farm Progress). "Cattle feedlots decline in USDA Census" (25,783 farms sold cattle on feed in 2022, down from 30,273 in 2017), 2024. https://www.beefmagazine.com/market-news/cattle-feedlots-decline-in-usda-census
10. Drovers. "A Review of Feedlot Structure and 2024 Marketings" (50,000+ head yards ≈ 35% of inventory/marketings; capacity), 2025. https://www.drovers.com/markets/market-reports/review-feedlot-structure-and-2024-marketings
11. USDA NASS. "Cattle on Feed" (1,000-plus-head monthly inventory ~11.7M; ~17M one-time capacity), 2026. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/cofd0626.pdf
12. farmdoc daily (University of Illinois). "Trends in Cattle Finishing Breakeven Prices and Net Returns" (breakevens $174/$192/$205/~$248; net returns; cattle crush; custom-feeding equity), 2026. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2026/07/trends-in-cattle-finishing-breakeven-prices-and-net-returns.html
13. Iowa Beef Center, Iowa State University. "Factors Affecting Cattle Feeding Profitability and Cost of Gain" (corn ~2/3 of cost-of-gain variation), n.d. https://www.iowabeefcenter.org/bch/ProfitabilityGainFactors.pdf
14. University of Kentucky Agricultural Economics. "Cow-Calf Profitability Estimates for 2025 and 2026" (~$1,059/head cash cost), 2025. https://agecon.mgcafe.uky.edu/articles/cow-calf-profitability-estimates-2025-and-2026-spring-calving-herd
15. Ohio State University Extension. "Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns" (feed/pasture largest cost; ~29% five-year cost rise), July 2025. https://u.osu.edu/beef/2025/07/09/cow-calf-production-costs-returns/
16. Drovers. "CattleFax 2025 Survey: Record $2,246 Calf Revenue Drives Historic Cow-Calf Profits," 2025. https://www.drovers.com/news/cattlefax-2025-survey-record-2-246-calf-revenue-drives-historic-cow-calf-profits
17. Angus Journal. "2025 Cattle Price Recap and What's Ahead for 2026?" (culling 13.2%→8.4%; calf crop smallest since 1941; ground beef $6.25/lb; fed/feeder prices), Feb. 2026. https://www.angus.org/angus-media/angus-journal/2026/02/market-advisor
18. DTN/Progressive Farmer. "Record Cattle Prices Expected Through 2027 Due to Smallest Herd Inventory in Decades" (feeders ~$364/cwt in 2026), 2025. https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/business-inputs/article/2025/09/03/record-cattle-prices-expected-2027
19. Bloomberg. "Why Beef Prices Won't Drop Anytime Soon" (feedlot/packer margin squeeze; rancher captures profit), 2026. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2026-beef-prices-cattle-supply-chain/
20. USDA ERS, Amber Waves. "Concentration in the U.S. Meatpacking Industry and How It Affects Competition and Cattle Prices" (four largest firms ~85% of steer/heifer purchases), 2024. https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2024/january/concentration-in-u-s-meatpacking-industry-and-how-it-affects-competition-and-cattle-prices
21. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). "Livestock Mandatory Reporting (LMR)" and packing-concentration history (~25% 1977, ~71% 1992, ~85% today), n.d. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/mmr/lmr/compliance/FAQ
22. CBS12 / Associated Press, "Trump admin targets 'big 4' meat packers in antitrust crackdown over beef prices" (2025), and The Rio Times, "DOJ Beef Antitrust Probe" (May 2026). https://cbs12.com/news/nation-world/trump-admin-targets-big-4-meat-packers-antitrust-crackdown-beef-prices
23. National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) / CattleFax. "2024 CattleFax Pages" (largest-feeder one-time capacities: Five Rivers ~870k, Cactus ~628k, Friona ~610k, Cobalt ~355k, Simplot ~230k), 2025. https://www.ncba.org/Media/NCBA2025/Docs/2024-cattlefaxpages.pdf
24. Feed & Grain, "JBS Sells Five Rivers Cattle Feeding" (to Pinnacle/Arcadia), and JBS N.V. Form 20-F (states it does not own cattle on feed), 2018/2026. https://www.feedandgrain.com/animal-feed-manufacturing/news/15398526/jbs-sells-five-rivers-cattle-feeding
25. USDA Risk Management Agency. "Livestock Gross Margin — Cattle" and "Livestock Risk Protection (LRP)," n.d. https://www.rma.usda.gov/about-crop-insurance/frequently-asked-questions/livestock-gross-margin-cattle
26. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) Final Rule and animal-drug oversight," n.d. https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/development-approval-process/fact-sheet-veterinary-feed-directive-final-rule-and-next-steps
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs)" (AFO 45-day definition; CAFO NPDES permits), n.d. https://www.epa.gov/npdes/animal-feeding-operations-afos
28. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. "Packers and Stockyards Act," n.d. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/packers-and-stockyards-act
29. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). "APHIS Bolsters Animal Disease Traceability in the United States" (electronically readable ear-tag rule), 2024. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/news/agency-announcements/aphis-bolsters-animal-disease-traceability-united-states
30. USDA, "Secretary Rollins Suspends Live Animal Imports Along Southern Border" (New World screwworm, May 2025), and APHIS, "USDA Confirms Presence of New World Screwworm in the United States" (Zavala County, TX), 2025–2026. https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2025/05/11/secretary-rollins-suspends-live-animal-imports-through-ports-entry-along-southern-border-effective
31. National Agricultural Law Center. "Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Overview" and "USDA Finalizes Voluntary 'Product of USA' Rule," 2024. https://nationalaglawcenter.org/usda-finalizes-voluntary-product-of-usa-rule/
32. U.S. Meat Export Federation via The Cattle Site. "US beef export value trends higher in 2024" ($10.45B), 2025. https://www.thecattlesite.com/news/us-beef-export-value-trends-higher-in-2024-usmef
33. Tradeint. "US beef imports by country" (imports ~17% of supply), 2026. https://tradeint.com/insights/us-beef-imports-by-country/
34. Beef Magazine (Farm Progress). "Outlook for 2026 U.S. and global beef production and trade" (per-capita ~59.3 lb) and "Beef demand jumped in 2025" (demand index 138, +27% vs 2019), 2025–2026. https://www.beefmagazine.com/market-news/outlook-for-2026-u-s-and-global-beef-production-and-trade
35. CME Group. "Livestock futures and options" (Live Cattle LE; Feeder Cattle GF; contract specs), 2026. https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/agriculture/livestock.html
36. Tyson Foods, Inc. "Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended September 27, 2025," 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/100493/000010049325000095/tsn-20250927.htm
37. CNBC. "Shares of scandal-plagued Brazilian meat giant JBS rise in U.S. public debut" (NYSE listing, ~$30B), June 13, 2025. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/13/jbs-brazilian-meat-company-goes-public-in-the-us.html
38. Tejon Ranch Co. "Form 10-K for Year Ended December 31, 2024," 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/96869/000009686925000006/trc-20241231.htm
39. Wikipedia, "King Ranch" (~825,000 acres) and "Waggoner Ranch" (~524,000 acres); King Ranch "Recent News" (50% stake in Cobalt Cattle), 2024–2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Ranch
40. AgReserves / Farmland Reserve, Inc. (affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). "About," n.d. https://www.agreserves.com/about/
41. U.S. Premium Beef. "About Us" (producer-owned; members hold an interest in National Beef), n.d. https://www.uspremiumbeef.com/AboutUs.aspx
42. ETF.com. "iPath Series B Bloomberg Livestock Subindex Total Return ETN (COW)," n.d. https://www.etf.com/COW
43. The Motley Fool. "2 Best Farmland REITs and How to Invest" (Gladstone Land, Farmland Partners), n.d. https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/market-sectors/real-estate-investing/reit/farmland-reits/
44. USDA Economic Research Service. "Cattle & Beef — Market Outlook" (July 2026 forecast: slaughter steer ~$251/cwt 2026, ~$254 2027), 2026. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/market-outlook
45. U.S. Census Bureau. "County Business Patterns: Methodology" (excludes crop/animal production incl. NAICS 112, and nonemployer businesses), n.d. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/technical-documentation/methodology.html
46. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages: Questions and Answers" (excludes self-employed and most small-farm agricultural workers), n.d. https://www.bls.gov/cew/questions-and-answers.htm