Histometrics

BDC · CEF Analytics

Public Reference

Industry Primers

Bottom-up NAICS industry primers written for both public-market and private investors. Leaf industries are researched from the ground up; every group, subsector, and sector above them reads as a contrast across the industries beneath it.

2122 industries · 24 sectors · NAICS 2022

Researched with AI assistance from official U.S. statistics and independent sources, with citations on every page. Figures are not individually verified against pinned evidence — primers marked Evidence-verified are. Industry research, not investment advice. Methodology.

National industryNAICS 313310

Textile and Fabric Finishing Mills (U.S., NAICS 313310)

1. Overview

Textile and fabric finishing mills are the "value-add" step between raw cloth and a usable product. They take undyed, unbleached "greige" (loom-state) fabric and turn it into finished goods by dyeing, bleaching, printing, and mechanically or chemically treating it — mercerizing, preshrinking, calendering, napping, stonewashing, and applying performance treatments such as water, stain, wrinkle, and flame resistance.[4] Census defines the industry as establishments that finish textiles, fabrics, and apparel or act as converters — buying greige fabric, arranging contract finishing, and wholesaling the finished goods.[5] A typical wet-processing mill receives greige fabric or yarn, prepares it by desizing, scouring or bleaching, applies dyes or printed patterns, rinses and dries it, then adds mechanical or chemical finishes before inspecting, testing, shade-matching, and packaging.[7] They are a manufacturing industry: capital-intensive, energy- and water-hungry, cyclical, and squeezed for decades by imports.

Why an investor should care: finishing is where a commodity fabric becomes differentiated, so margins depend on specialization, throughput, and cost control rather than sheer scale. It is also one of the most environmentally regulated corners of U.S. manufacturing (dye wastewater, PFAS), which is both a cost and a moat for compliant domestic operators.

Ways in differ sharply by investor type. For public-market investors there are essentially no pure-play U.S. listings; exposure comes through a couple of small-cap home-textile makers and through "picks-and-shovels" suppliers of dyes, chemicals, and digital-printing equipment. For private investors the industry is the opposite — hundreds of privately held, often family-owned commission dyehouses and integrated mills, many facing succession, which is where most of the ownership and deal activity actually sits.

2. What it is and how it's structured

Scope. The industry covers establishments that finish textiles, fabrics, and apparel — bleaching, dyeing, printing (roller, screen, flock, plissé), and mechanical/chemical finishing — plus "converters" who buy greige goods, have them finished on contract, and sell the finished fabric at wholesale.[4][5] Two business models dominate:

  • Commission (toll) finishers process fabric the customer still owns, charging a fee per yard or per pound. They carry no fabric inventory and take no price risk on the cloth itself.
  • Converters buy greige fabric, finish it (in-house or on contract), and resell it. They take inventory and price risk in exchange for a wider margin.

A third model — the integrated textile producer that spins, weaves or knits and finishes internally — is often not classified in 313310: an establishment that weaves and finishes is generally classified as a fabric mill (313210), and one that knits and finishes as a knit-fabric mill (313240).[5]

What it excludes (adjacent NAICS codes). Finishing is one link in a chain, and the neighbors matter because a lot of real-world finishing happens inside them:

  • 313110 Fiber, Yarn, and Thread Mills — spinning fiber into yarn/thread.
  • 313210 Broadwoven Fabric Mills — weaving cloth wider than 12 inches.
  • 313220 / 313230 / 313240 — narrow fabric/embroidery, nonwovens, and knit fabric mills.
  • 313320 Fabric Coating Mills — coating or impregnating fabric (e.g., polyurethane- or PVC-coated technical fabrics). Coating is explicitly not 313310.[4][5]
  • 314110 — carpet manufacturing and finishing.
  • 315 Apparel — cut-and-sew garment finishing (e.g., garment washing at the sewing plant).
  • 323111 — apparel printing.

Ownership mix. Overwhelmingly private. The universe runs from single-plant family dyehouses to large, privately held, vertically integrated materials-science companies (Milliken, Glen Raven) and private-equity-backed platforms (Elevate Textiles). Publicly traded pure-plays effectively do not exist (see Section 4).

3. How big it is

Federal figures for NAICS 313310:

Metric Value Source
Receipts (industry revenue) ~$3.90 billion (2022) Economic Census 2022 [2]
Firms 501 (2022) Economic Census 2022 [2]
Establishments 570 (2023) County Business Patterns 2023 [1]
Paid employees 14,366 (2023) County Business Patterns 2023 [1]
Annual payroll ~$707 million (2023) County Business Patterns 2023 [1]
Average wage ~$49,000/yr (payroll ÷ employees) derived from [1]
SBA small-business ceiling 1,000 employees SBA size standards 2023 [3]

For scale, revenue works out to roughly $270,000 per worker and an average of about $7.8 million per firm[1][2] — modest for manufacturing, reflecting the labor- and service-heavy, toll-processing nature of the work. The industry has shrunk: 2017 receipts were about $4.9 billion, so nominal revenue fell roughly a fifth in five years even before adjusting for inflation.[6] The broader textile-mills subsector (NAICS 313) employed about 89,000 people nationally in mid-2024, of which finishing is a small slice.[8]

The contraction continues. BLS data for the four-digit group 3133 (which includes both 313310 finishers and 313320 fabric coaters) shows employment falling from an estimated 26,400 in 2024 to 21,800 in 2025, with group output down 4.0% and hours worked down 17.3% — evidence of ongoing capacity rationalization.[9][10]

Undercount caveat. Census coverage of stand-alone finishers is good — these are real payroll businesses, not gig operators — but 313310 understates how much fabric finishing actually happens in the U.S. Finishing done captively inside a vertically integrated mill is classified by that mill's primary product (a weaver that also dyes counts under 313210; a knitter under 313240; a coater under 313320). So 313310 measures the merchant / commission-finishing market, not total national finishing capacity. Private, market-research estimates that lump in coating or integrated activity run higher (roughly $6–7 billion), which is a scope difference, not a contradiction.[4][5]

4. The investable universe

There is no U.S.-listed pure-play textile-finishing company. The closest public exposure and the main private owners:

Company Ticker / status Scale Finishing relevance
Culp, Inc. NASDAQ: CULP ~$213M net sales (FY2025) [15][16] Mattress & upholstery fabrics; integrated weaving/knitting, dyeing and finishing — closest public play
Unifi, Inc. NYSE: UFI ~$571M revenue (FY2025) [17] Recycled-polyester yarn (REPREVE); yarn texturing/dyeing — adjacent (mostly 313110), not core finishing
Kornit Digital NASDAQ: KRNT (Israel) equipment maker Digital textile-printing systems sold to finishers/printers — a supplier proxy
Milliken & Company Private (Spartanburg, SC) 22 vertically integrated textile plants in the Southeast U.S. [11][12] Materials science; performance/industrial textiles, finishing, and specialty chemicals; portfolio no longer uses intentionally added PFAS chemistry [13]
Glen Raven, Inc. Private (NC) ~$0.9B revenue [18] Solution-dyed performance fabrics (Sunbrella) for awning, marine, furniture
Elevate Textiles Private (PE-backed) multi-plant Burlington, Cone Denim, American & Efird — apparel/denim fabrics, threads, finishing
Mount Vernon Mills Private ~750 employees, 6 U.S. facilities, potential output of ~90 million yards/year at Trion, GA complex [19][20] Weaving, dyeing, surface finishing, sanforizing for workwear, uniforms, industrial fabrics, denim
Thomaston Mills Private (family-owned) — Commission finisher; acquired Palmetto Finishing [21]
Others (private) — — Greenwood Mills [22], Shawmut, Aurora Specialty Textiles, Tex Tech, Standard Textile, Apex Mills, plus a long tail of ~450 small commission dyehouses

Dye and finishing-chemical suppliers give indirect public exposure — DuPont (NYSE: DD), Dow (NYSE: DOW), and Chemours (NYSE: CC, the PFAS story) — as does privately held Archroma (SK Capital), a leading textile-dye and finishing-chemical maker. There is no pure-play textile-finishing ETF; passive exposure only comes buried inside broad industrials or consumer-discretionary funds.

5. How the money works

Finishing is a manufacturing-margin business, so the economics look like a factory, not a brand:

  • Volume and capacity utilization. Dyeing ranges, tenter/stenter frames, and printing lines are expensive and fixed. Profit comes from keeping them running near capacity; utilization is the single biggest swing factor on margins. Low utilization is particularly damaging because boilers, treatment systems, laboratories, and maintenance do not scale down proportionately.
  • Commission fee vs. converter spread. Toll finishers earn a price per yard/pound for processing customer-owned cloth — steady, inventory-light, but thin. Converters earn the spread between greige cost and finished selling price — fatter, but exposed to fabric-price and fashion-inventory risk.
  • Input costs. The main variable costs are greige fabric (for converters), dyes and chemicals, and energy and water — drying, steaming, and heat-setting make finishing one of the more energy-intensive textile steps, and wastewater treatment is a real line item.
  • Yield / first-quality rate. Off-shade dye lots, streaks, and shrinkage defects become "seconds" or rework, which directly erodes margin. Color consistency, first-pass shade approval, and repeatability are competitive advantages.
  • Cyclicality. Orders track apparel, home-furnishings, and auto demand, which are discretionary and inventory-driven; mills feel both the downturn and the restocking whip.

Margin benchmark (imperfect). Culp, the closest listed proxy, reported a consolidated gross margin of 11.8% in fiscal 2025 — but with sharp segment variation: 7.0% in mattress fabrics and 18.9% in upholstery fabrics.[16] These figures demonstrate the effect of product mix and footprint but should not be read as 313310 industry margins, since Culp combines fabric manufacturing, sourcing, finishing, and fabrication across multiple countries.

In short: owners make money by running expensive lines full, buying dyes/energy well, holding yield high, and — increasingly — charging a premium for finishes competitors can't easily replicate (technical performance, quick-turn domestic runs, certified PFAS-free).

6. What drives demand

  • End markets. Apparel and fashion; home textiles (mattresses, upholstery, bedding, drapery, towels); and technical/industrial textiles (automotive, medical, protective and military apparel, filtration, geotextiles). The technical segment is the growth end — the U.S. technical-textiles market is projected to grow roughly 3.9% a year to 2030 — while commodity apparel finishing keeps eroding.[27]
  • Consumer and housing cycles. Furniture and mattress demand tracks housing turnover and discretionary spending, so home-textile finishers ride the housing cycle.
  • Fashion velocity and short runs. Fast fashion and made-to-order favor digital textile printing, a fast-growing niche (double-digit projected growth globally) that suits small, quick domestic runs and cuts water use dramatically — up to ~95% reduction.[26]
  • "Made in USA," defense, and reshoring. The Berry Amendment requires the Department of Defense to buy domestically grown/produced textiles, a durable demand anchor for U.S. finishers.[23][24] Yarn-forward rules in most U.S. textile free-trade agreements also encourage U.S. and Western Hemisphere textile processing by requiring regional yarn and fabric production for garments to receive preferences.[25] Broader reshoring is a hoped-for tailwind but, so far, a weak one (Section 8).
  • Import context. USDA estimated that U.S. cotton textile and apparel imports were approximately 8.5 billion raw-fiber-equivalent pounds in 2025, while domestic cotton-mill use was only about 0.8 billion pounds — illustrating where most consumer textile volume is now processed.[28]
  • Regulation as demand. State PFAS bans and flammability rules force reformulation and create demand for compliant domestic finishing (Section 7).

7. Regulation

Finishing is water- and chemical-intensive, so environmental rules are central:

  • Clean Water Act — wastewater. Dye and finishing effluent (color, biochemical/chemical oxygen demand, metals, salts, pH) is governed by EPA's Textile Mills Effluent Guidelines (40 CFR Part 410), with limits covering BOD, COD, suspended solids, oil and grease, sulfide, phenols, chromium, and pH. These are enforced through NPDES discharge permits or industrial-pretreatment limits before sending waste to a municipal plant.[7] Facilities discharging to municipal treatment systems also face local pretreatment limits and sewer charges.
  • PFAS. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ("forever chemicals") are used in water/stain-resistant finishes. EPA is collecting data to set PFAS limits in textile wastewater,[29] and has stated that PFAS, including legacy long-chain compounds, have been found in wastewater from some textile mills — and that discharges can continue even where a mill no longer uses the chemistry, meaning "PFAS-free product" does not equal "PFAS-free site."[7] California (AB 1817) and New York banned PFAS in most apparel and textiles effective January 1, 2025, with thresholds tightening in 2027.[30] This is a live reformulation cost and a liability risk — and an edge for finishers already PFAS-free.
  • Air emissions. Clean Air Act limits on VOCs from curing/finishing apply. EPA's fabric-printing, coating and dyeing NESHAP applies to major sources and identifies solvents including toluene, methanol, xylenes, glycol ethers, and formaldehyde; EPA estimated approximately 135 major-source facilities across that broader source category.[31]
  • Hazardous waste. RCRA rules on spent dyes and solvents apply.
  • Occupational safety. OSHA standards relevant to textile operations include cotton dust, air contaminants, and formaldehyde exposure.[32]
  • Product safety. Flammability standards drive flame-retardant finishing — notably the 16 CFR Part 1633 open-flame mattress standard[33] and children's-sleepwear rules — plus consumer-product chemical limits.
  • Trade and procurement. Tariffs, trade agreements, and the Berry Amendment[23][24] shape both the competitive threat (imports) and a protected slice of demand (defense).

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

The industry is fragmented but with a concentrated top tier. The four largest firms hold about 30% of receipts and the top eight about 42% — a low Herfindahl-Hirschman Index of 386 (well under the 1,500 "unconcentrated" line).[2] Yet the top 50 firms account for roughly 79% of receipts, meaning a cluster of larger integrated players sits atop a long tail of ~450 small shops.[2] Activity is geographically concentrated in the Carolinas–Georgia Piedmont, the historic U.S. textile belt.

The dominant structural story is decades of consolidation and closure as weaving, knitting, and apparel offshored and finishing followed the fabric. Survivors specialized (technical, performance, defense, medical, quick-turn domestic) or were rolled up — Elevate Textiles assembled Burlington, Cone Denim, and American & Efird under private-equity ownership; the dye/chemical side consolidated under owners like SK Capital (Archroma). Expect continued attrition and opportunistic roll-ups rather than green-field expansion.

9. Risks

  • Import competition and trade-policy whiplash. The core secular threat. Even with new tariffs, 2025 U.S. textile output fell about 4% and apparel manufacturing about 17%; imports simply shifted from China to Vietnam, Bangladesh, and India rather than reshoring.[34][35] Trade policy is also volatile, which cuts both ways.
  • Cyclical end-demand. Housing, furniture, apparel, and auto downturns hit order books hard.
  • Input and energy cost volatility. Natural gas, electricity, water, and dye/chemical prices are largely uncontrollable.
  • Environmental compliance and PFAS liability. Reformulation costs, wastewater upgrades, and potential legacy-PFAS liability — EPA notes that sites may continue discharging PFAS even after ceasing use of the chemistry.[7][29][30]
  • Customer concentration. Losing a single large converter or brand can idle a plant.
  • Capital intensity and aging equipment. Reinvestment needs are high; underinvested plants lose on cost and quality.
  • Labor and skills. Skilled dyeing/finishing operators are a shrinking pool. Shade matching, chemical formulation, machine setup, fabric handling, maintenance, and wastewater operations rely on experienced personnel.
  • Environmental due diligence. A buyer should treat wastewater permits, historical chemical use, sludge disposal, underground infrastructure, and off-site disposal records as core commercial diligence, not merely legal appendices.

10. How to invest and the outlook

Public routes (limited). For direct-ish exposure, Culp (CULP) is the closest listed operator — a small-cap home-textiles maker whose economics turn on the same dyeing/finishing and utilization dynamics, though it combines fabric manufacturing, sourcing, finishing, and fabrication across multiple countries.[15][16] Unifi (UFI) offers a recycled-fiber/sustainability angle upstream of finishing.[17] For "picks and shovels," Kornit Digital (KRNT) sells the digital-printing hardware the industry is adopting,[26] and diversified chemical names (DD, DOW, CC) carry finishing-chemical and PFAS exposure. All are indirect; position sizing should reflect that these are cyclical small/idiosyncratic bets, not a clean sector play.

Private routes (where the industry actually lives). Direct ownership or acquisition of commission dyehouses and integrated finishers — many family-owned and succession-driven — is the primary way to own this business, alongside private-equity roll-ups of specialty/technical platforms and supplier/technology plays (dyes, chemicals, digital equipment, wastewater treatment). Underwriting hinges on plant utilization, customer diversification, environmental-compliance status (PFAS especially), and equipment age. The investable thesis is strongest where the plant has durable permits and water access, defensible technical recipes, qualification-heavy customers, long repeat runs, domestic-content advantages, and enough utilization to absorb the fixed environmental infrastructure. The corresponding value traps are plants marketed on replacement cost while running below economic utilization, converters whose reported revenue includes pass-through fabric value, and older wet-processing sites carrying unpriced environmental liabilities.

Outlook (forward-looking judgment). Commodity finishing will likely keep shrinking under import pressure; tariffs alone appear unlikely to rebuild hollowed-out capacity in the near term.[34][35] The durable value is migrating to specialization — technical, defense (Berry-compliant), medical, and performance finishes — and to quick-turn domestic and digital printing plus compliance-driven reformulation (PFAS-free, low-water dyeing that can cut water use up to ~95%).[26] Near-term swing factors to watch: trade policy, the pace and cost of PFAS regulation, energy prices, the housing/mattress demand recovery, and defense budgets. Judgment: a mature, low-growth industry where disciplined, specialized, compliant operators can still earn attractive returns, but broad passive exposure is neither available nor advisable.

Sources

  1. U.S. Census Bureau. "County Business Patterns 2023 — NAICS 313310." 2023. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
  2. U.S. Census Bureau. "2022 Economic Census — Concentration Ratios / Selected Statistics, NAICS 313310." 2022. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
  3. U.S. Small Business Administration. "Table of Size Standards (NAICS 313310 — 1,000 employees)." 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
  4. IBISWorld / U.S. Census Bureau. "NAICS Code 313310 — Textile and Fabric Finishing Mills (definition and scope)." 2024. https://www.ibisworld.com/classifications/naics/313310/textile-and-fabric-finishing-mills/
  5. U.S. Census Bureau. "2022 NAICS Definition — 313310." 2022. https://www.census.gov/naics/?details=3133&input=3133&year=2022
  6. SICCODE. "NAICS Code 313310 — Textile and Fabric Finishing Mills (2017 revenue)." 2024. https://siccode.com/naics-code/313310/textile-fabric-finishing-mills
  7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Textile Mills Effluent Guidelines (40 CFR Part 410)." 2024. https://www.epa.gov/eg/textile-mills-effluent-guidelines
  8. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Textile Mills: NAICS 313 — Industries at a Glance." 2024. https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag313.htm
  9. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Detailed Industry Productivity — 2024 Release." April 2025. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/prin_04242025.htm
  10. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Detailed Industry Productivity — 2025 Release." 2025. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/prin.htm
  11. Milliken & Company. "Leadership and Ownership." 2024. https://www.milliken.com/en-us/about-us/leadership
  12. Milliken & Company. "Manufacturing Excellence — Textile Footprint." 2024. https://www.milliken.com/en-gb/textiles/capabilities/manufacturing-excellence
  13. Milliken & Company. "Textiles — PFAS-Free Portfolio." 2024. https://www.milliken.com/en-us/textiles
  14. Wikipedia. "Milliken & Company." 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliken_%26_Company
  15. Culp, Inc. "Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2025 Results." Business Wire, 2025. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250625123994/en/Culp-Announces-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-Fiscal-2025-Results
  16. Culp, Inc. "Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K." SEC EDGAR, 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/723603/000095017025095233/culp-20250427.htm
  17. UNIFI, Inc. "Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2025 Results." 2025. https://investor.unifi.com/news-releases/news-release-details/unifir-makers-reprever-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2025
  18. Owler / Wikipedia. "Glen Raven, Inc. — company profile (revenue estimate)." 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glen_Raven,_Inc
  19. Mount Vernon Mills. "Company Overview." 2024. https://www.mvmills.com/
  20. Mount Vernon Mills. "Apparel Fabrics Capabilities." 2024. https://www.mvmills.com/apparel-fabrics/
  21. National Council of Textile Organizations. "Thomaston Mills Member Profile." 2024. https://ncto.org/thomaston-mills/
  22. North Carolina State University. "Textile Industry Archive — Greenwood Mills." 2024. https://history.textiles.ncsu.edu/textile-companies/greenwood-mills/
  23. U.S. Department of Commerce / International Trade Administration. "The Berry Amendment." https://www.trade.gov/berry-amendment
  24. Acquisition.gov / DFARS. "Berry Amendment Restrictions." https://www.acquisition.gov/node/35452/printable/print
  25. U.S. International Trade Commission. "Yarn-Forward Rules of Origin Explained." 2018. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/working_papers/id_18_053.html
  26. Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence / Kornit Digital. "Digital Textile Printing Market and Waterless Printing." 2025. https://www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/digital-textile-printing-market
  27. Grand View Research / SelectUSA. "U.S. Technical Textiles Market Size & Outlook, 2024–2030." 2024. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/technical-textiles-market/united-states
  28. USDA Economic Research Service. "Cotton and Wool Outlook — March 2026." 2026. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/outlooks/113948/CWS-26c.pdf
  29. Williams Mullen. "EPA to Issue Information Collection Requests to Set PFAS Limitations for Textile Wastewaters." 2024. https://www.williamsmullen.com/insights/news/legal-news/epa-issue-information-collection-requests-set-pfas-limitations-textile
  30. Morgan Lewis. "New York and California: Bans on PFAS in Textiles and Apparel Begin January 1, 2025." 2024. https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2024/11/new-york-and-california-bans-on-pfas-in-textiles-and-apparel-begin-january-1-2025
  31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles NESHAP." 2024. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/printing-coating-and-dyeing-fabrics-and-other-textiles-national
  32. U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. "Textile Industry Standards." https://www.osha.gov/textiles/standards
  33. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission / eCFR. "16 CFR Part 1633 — Standard for the Flammability (Open Flame) of Mattress Sets." https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-II/subchapter-D/part-1633
  34. Sourcing Journal / WWD. "It Will Take More Than Tariffs to Bring Back U.S. Textile Manufacturing, Industry Insiders Say." 2025. https://wwd.com/sourcing-journal/industry-news/us-textile-manufacturing-tariffs-trade-ncto-cotswold-industries-mount-vernon-mills-1238937985/
  35. Sourcing Journal / WWD (Kearney Reshoring Index). "US Apparel Manufacturing Fell 17% in 2025." 2025. https://wwd.com/sourcing-journal/trade/kearney-reshoring-index-usa-domestic-apparel-manufacturing-1238945612/