Snack Food Manufacturing (U.S.) — An Investor's Primer

NAICS 2022 code 31191. NAICS = North American Industry Classification System, the standard code set U.S. statistical agencies use to define industries. This is a five-digit "industry" that rolls up two more detailed six-digit children: 311911 (roasted nuts and peanut butter) and 311919 (other snack food — chips, popcorn, pretzels, and the like).

1. Overview

This is the business of making shelf-stable snacks: potato and tortilla chips, cheese puffs, popcorn, bagged pretzels, and pork rinds on one side; roasted snack nuts and peanut butter on the other. It is one of the most defensive, cash-generative corners of packaged food — steady volumes, sticky brands, and, at the top, some of the fattest margins in all of consumer staples. Americans buy these products in good times and bad, which makes the category unusually recession-resistant for a manufacturing industry.[1][2][3]

Why an investor cares: this is a scale-and-distribution game with durable demand, but the two halves of it are heading in different directions. Salty snacks (the larger half) are a mature, high-margin cash machine now facing a genuine demand inflection — weight-loss drugs, health-policy pressure, and value-seeking shoppers. Nuts and peanut butter (the smaller half) are steadier and even carry a mild health-and-protein tailwind, but live and die on the price of the raw nut and the safety record of the plant. The most useful thing to understand at this level is the contrast between the two children — their size, direction, concentration, and who owns them (Section 2).[2][3][4]

For public-market investors, there is no clean "snack food" stock. The economics sit mostly inside diversified food companies — PepsiCo above all — with two small pure plays (Utz for chips, John B. Sanfilippo for nuts) and several partial plays. Private investors reach the industry through a deep bench of family-owned regional makers, private-equity-backed contract manufacturers ("co-packers"), private-label suppliers, and grower cooperatives.[4][5][6]

2. What's inside — the two child industries and how they differ

The 5-digit industry splits into two children that look alike on a factory floor (both fry, bake, roast, and bag high-volume food) but differ sharply as investments. The federal line between them is simple: nuts, seeds, and peanut butter are 311911; everything else salty — grain, potato, and corn snacks — is 311919.[1][7]

(HHI = Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, the standard market-concentration measure; U.S. antitrust agencies treat below 1,500 as "unconcentrated." CR4 = combined share of the four largest firms.)

Three contrasts matter most for an investor:

• Size and structure. Snack food (311919) is twice the nut/peanut-butter business (311911) and far more concentrated — the four largest firms make three-quarters of shipments, whereas the nut side is a fragmented field of processors, co-packers, and cooperatives with only 29.6% in the top four.[8][9]
• Growth direction. The larger half faces the clearer threat (appetite-suppressing GLP-1 drugs, sodium and label pressure, 2025 retail sales down 0.5%), while the smaller half sells cheap protein that actually firms up when budgets tighten — peanut-butter consumption hit 6% above the ten-year average in 2024/25.[3][4][11]
• Ownership and how you buy in. Both halves put their best brands inside diversified parents, so the "pure" public exposure is small (UTZ, JBSS) and the private field is broad and active.[4][5]

3. How big it is

Our federal ground-truth figures for the combined industry (NAICS 31191):

Reading the numbers. About $42.5 billion in manufacturer shipments flows from roughly 760 plants and 636 companies employing roughly 62,000–68,500 people (depending on year) — a large, well-established manufacturing industry. The two children reconcile cleanly into this total: $14.42B (nuts/PB) plus $28.1B (other snacks) ≈ $42.5B.[8][9] Note that the firm counts of the two children (239 + 400 = 639) slightly exceed the level's 636, because a handful of companies operate in both — a reminder that these counts are of firms active in each code, not mutually exclusive owners.

On concentration. At this five-digit level every concentration statistic (the CR4/CR8/CR20/CR50 ratios and the HHI) is suppressed in the federal data, so we do not state one.[13] The useful signal comes from the children underneath, which point in opposite directions: nuts/peanut butter is unconcentrated (HHI ~370, CR4 29.6%), while other snack food is highly concentrated (CR4 75.5%). Blending them is precisely why a single number for the whole would mislead.[8][9]

Undercount caveat. This is not an industry hidden from federal statistics by tiny or informal operators — the plants are capital-heavy and comparatively few, and payrolls are counted cleanly. The real blind spots run the other way:

• Factory-gate, not retail. The ~$42.5 billion is what plants sell to distributors and retailers, before store markup. Utz, citing Circana, placed the 2025 U.S. salty-snack category alone at approximately $42 billion at retail; retail peanut-butter sales run about $5.6 billion and snack-nut retail about $5.2 billion — the gap is retail margin plus adjacent categories.[4][15][16]
• Brand economics are buried. The biggest players are conglomerates, so how much Doritos, Jif, or Planters actually earns is invisible in Census data and only partly disclosed in filings.
• Crops sit elsewhere. The peanut and tree-nut harvests are farming (NAICS 111992 and 111335), not manufacturing, so multibillion-dollar crop values are not in this figure.[17]

4. The investable universe — where value concentrates across the children

The pattern is the same on both sides of the industry: the best brands sit inside diversified parents, leaving only two small U.S.-listed pure plays. Value concentrates heavily in the snack-food (311919) half, because that is where the single dominant operator lives.

Publicly traded owners (parent scale; snack exposure noted):

Major private and other owners:

• 311919: Mars (took Pringles/Kellanova private in a ~$36B deal, Dec 2025); Shearer's Foods (PE-owned, the largest private-brand salty-snack co-packer in North America, ~11 facilities); Mission/Gruma, Herr's, Old Dutch, Wise (Arca Continental) — many decades-old family firms or foreign subsidiaries.[25][26]
• 311911: Blue Diamond Growers (a 3,000-plus-member almond cooperative, describing itself as the world's largest tree-nut processor); The Wonderful Company (pistachios/almonds, Resnick family); Hampton Farms (in-shell peanuts and store peanut butter); private-label co-packers behind Kirkland, Great Value, and Good & Gather.[6][27][28]

Bottom line for the public investor. To own the industry's economics at scale you are really buying PepsiCo (dominant, but snacks are ~55% of a company that also sells drinks) and, for a focused bet, one of the two pure plays: Utz on the chip side or John B. Sanfilippo on the nut side. Everything else is a slice inside a larger staples name.[4][5][18]

5. How the money works

Both children run the same basic model — volume × price, on a thin agricultural input, won or lost on scale and distribution — but the profit levers differ.

• Inputs are the swing factor, and they differ by child. For chips and popcorn (311919) the big variables are potatoes, corn, wheat, and especially frying oil; when oil spikes, makers can't reprice fast enough in a competitive aisle and margins compress. Raw materials can run roughly 15–25% of the wholesale price for extruded snacks; fried potato chips are more oil-intensive.[29][30] For nuts and peanut butter (311911) the raw nut is the cost of goods — at John B. Sanfilippo, nuts, other commodities, packaging, and edible ingredients represented about 73% of fiscal 2025 cost of sales; a 30% rise in weighted-average raw-nut inventory cost dropped gross margin from 20.1% to 18.4%.[5] Peanuts are relatively stable (federally price-supported, recent farm prices around $470–540/ton), while tree nuts swing with drought, water access, and imports.[5][31]
• Two profit models across the level. Branded players (Frito-Lay, Jif, Skippy, Planters) earn on brand equity, shelf power, and pricing power. Private-label and contract processors earn on scale, procurement skill, and factory efficiency — thinner margins, but volume the branded players won't chase.
• Distribution is the deepest moat, mostly on the snack side. The structural advantage in 311919 is direct-store-delivery (DSD) — the maker's own trucks and route drivers stock shelves and control placement. PepsiCo describes DSD as giving the manufacturer more control over product placement and replenishment; Frito-Lay's DSD network is the single strongest competitive moat in packaged food.[18] Utz runs a hybrid DSD model through independent route operators and third-party distributors, creating service and execution risk outside company-owned plants.[4] The nut/peanut-butter side leans more on conventional warehouse distribution and brand.
• What "good" looks like — and how wide the gap is. PepsiCo Foods North America earned roughly a 22–23% operating margin in 2025 (~$6.2B operating profit on ~$27.5B revenue), extraordinary for food and driven by scale, DSD, and brands.[18] Hershey's salty-snack segment earned a 19.0% segment margin in 2025.[20] Focused processors earn a fraction of that — Utz's consolidated gross margin was 24.9% in 2025 (down from 26.2% in 2024 due to capacity-expansion spending and supply-chain inflation); John B. Sanfilippo ran ~18% gross margin in fiscal 2025.[4][5] The smallest regionals and co-packers run low-single-digit to mid-teens. That spread is exactly why the long tail keeps consolidating into the leaders.
• Volume vs. price — the shared 2020s problem. Through 2021–2023 inflation, leaders on both sides pushed big price increases and held margin. By 2024–2025 shoppers pushed back — buying smaller, trading to private label, or skipping — so volumes softened even as revenue held. PepsiCo's 2025 PFNA savory-snack volume declined 3% even though PFNA revenue increased slightly.[18] In any snack company's results, watch the split between "price/mix" and "volume."
• Capital and throughput. These are capital-intensive plants (fryers, ovens, extruders, roasters, bagging lines). Utilization drives unit cost, so owners chase throughput and regional plant density to cut freight — which is also a risk: a single plant outage can dent a whole brand's year.
• Retailer concentration. The supply side ranges from unconcentrated (nuts) to highly concentrated (chips), but the buy side is consistently powerful — PepsiCo reported Walmart and affiliates represented approximately 14% of consolidated 2025 revenue; at John B. Sanfilippo, Walmart was about 40% of fiscal 2025 sales and the five largest customers collectively about 67%.[5][18]

6. What drives demand

• The snacking habit. Americans increasingly graze instead of eating three meals, favoring convenient, single-serve, "permissible indulgence" — the durable tailwind under the whole level.
• Value and price sensitivity (a two-way force). In soft economies shoppers trade down to value sizes, club packs, and private label — a headwind for branded margins but a tailwind for co-packers. Circana reports private-label snack growth is outpacing branded products in several core categories.[32] On the nut side, price sensitivity actually helps the category: peanut butter is cheap protein, so demand firms when budgets tighten even as shoppers shift to store brands.[22]
• Health and "better-for-you." Growth pockets — baked/popped vs. fried, reduced-sodium, higher-protein, clean-label — favor both nut butters (protein-dense by nature) and premium snack brands like SkinnyPop and Boulder Canyon. Circana reported in 2026 that consumption of snacks carrying a label claim had risen 5% over the preceding year.[33][34]
• Flavor and multicultural demand. Bold, spicy, and globally inspired flavors and formats are a persistent growth lever, especially in chips.
• The GLP-1 headwind (the big new variable, mostly on the snack side). GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) drugs — Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound — suppress appetite and shift preferences away from salty, high-calorie snacks. Surveys have found snack consumption dropping 40–60% among users, and at least one bank has forecast a ~4% decline in salty-snack consumption over the coming decade as usage spreads.[3] This is the clearest structural threat to 311919's decades-long volume growth; the nut/peanut-butter side is less exposed because it sells a protein staple rather than an indulgence.
• Tree-nut consumption rising. USDA estimates 2024/25 per-capita availability at 1.9 pounds for almonds, 0.7 pounds for pistachios, 0.6 pounds for walnuts, and 0.5 pounds for pecans — average almond availability in 2022/23–2024/25 was approximately twice its early-2000s level, while pistachio availability had more than tripled.[35]
• Exports. U.S. peanut exports hit a record ~$890 million in 2023, an added demand channel beyond the domestic shelf.[36]

7. Regulation

Food safety and nutrition labeling define the regulatory reality across the whole level, both children overseen by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) — written preventive controls, sanitation, environmental pathogen monitoring, and nutrition labeling.[7][37]

• Pathogen safety (sharpest on the nut side). Low-moisture foods like peanut butter don't grow Salmonella, but the bacterium can be unusually heat-resistant in ready-to-eat nuts; roasting must be a validated kill step, and post-roast cooling, blanching, sorting, milling, and packaging must prevent recontamination. FDA's investigation of the 2022 Jif outbreak identified post-roasting environmental-control failures.[38][39] Peanuts and tree nuts also carry aflatoxin risk (FDA action level 20 parts per billion), enforced through mandatory grading.[40]
• Allergen labeling. Peanuts and tree nuts are major declared allergens under the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act; the FASTER Act (2021) added sesame as the ninth. Cross-contact controls are a real operational and liability burden.[41]
• Acrylamide (sharpest on the chip side). A compound that forms when starchy foods are fried or baked hot; FDA guidance is non-binding, with no legal U.S. limit, but it remains a litigation and reformulation risk.[42]
• Sodium, dyes, and "MAHA." FDA has issued voluntary sodium-reduction targets and proposed a mandatory front-of-pack nutrition label; it moved to ban FD&C Red No. 3 (effective January 2027 for food) and, under the "Make America Healthy Again" initiative, pushed to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes — all driving reformulation, and all falling hardest on salty snacks.[43][44][45]
• USDA peanut program. The U.S. Department of Agriculture runs marketing-assistance loans that set a price floor for peanut growers (2024 runner-type loan rate ~$354/ton; the 2018 Farm Bill set the national rate at $355/ton), stabilizing the input market that nut processors buy from.[46]
• Trade and tariffs. Tariffs cut both ways across the level — raising the cost of imported nuts, oils, packaging, and equipment, and threatening export access. John B. Sanfilippo sourced about 28% of the dollar value of its fiscal 2025 nut and dried-fruit purchases abroad.[5][47]

Net direction of travel: less salt, cleaner labels, more disclosure — which raises reformulation spending and favors scaled players who can absorb it.

8. Consolidation

The central story on both sides is the same: bolt regional brands onto a national distribution and procurement machine to lift their margins — which is why strategics pay up for scale and why the long tail keeps folding in.

Snack food (311919) — one giant, then a rolling wave of deals:

• Campbell's bought Snyder's-Lance (2018, ~$6B) to build a snacks division.[19]
• Hershey bought SkinnyPop (2017) and Dot's Pretzels (2021, ~$1.2B) to enter salty snacks — now ~10% of the company.[20]
• Utz rolled up regional brands (Golden Flake, Zapp's, On The Border) into a public pure play.[4]
• Mars acquired Kellanova (Pringles) for ~$36B, closing December 2025 — taking Pringles private.[25]

Nuts and peanut butter (311911) — steady consolidation on the branded side:

• Hormel bought Skippy from Unilever (2013) and Planters from Kraft Heinz (2021, $3.35B).[48]
• Post bought Peter Pan from Conagra (2021) and the remaining stake in 8th Avenue Food & Provisions (July 2025, ~$880M including assumed finance leases).[24][49]
• Sanfilippo rolled up brands (Squirrel Brand, Southern Style) to scale its platform.[5]
• Justin's passed from Hormel to private equity (Forward Consumer Partners, 2025).[50]

Across both, retailer private label keeps quietly gaining share — made largely by independent co-packers — a structural check on branded pricing power and a tailwind for contract manufacturers like Shearer's and TreeHouse.[3][26][32]

9. Risks

• Structural demand erosion from GLP-1 drugs — the level's biggest uncertainty, concentrated in the larger snack-food half; could turn a low-growth staple into a slow-decline one if adoption and appetite effects compound.[3]
• Food-safety events — the signature risk on the nut side. The 2009 Peanut Corporation of America Salmonella outbreak killed 9, sickened 714, and jailed the owner for 28 years; Jif's 2022 recall drew an FDA warning letter citing preventive-controls failures; Planters' 2024 Listeria recall and five-week plant closure each hit sales and reputation.[21][38][51]
• Commodity and input volatility — frying oil, corn, wheat, and potatoes on one side; peanut and tree-nut crops on the other. Price-sensitive shoppers limit how fast costs pass through. JBSS's gross margin fell from 20.1% to 18.4% in fiscal 2025 on a 30% rise in raw-nut inventory cost.[5][29][31]
• Health and regulatory pressure — sodium targets, front-of-pack warnings, dye bans, acrylamide scrutiny, and allergen controls raise reformulation cost and dent "indulgence" positioning.[42][43][44][45]
• Private-label trade-down — erodes branded volume and pricing power in soft economies, across both children.[32]
• Scale asymmetry — Frito-Lay's dominance squeezes sub-scale snack competitors; the smaller pure plays (Utz, JBSS) carry more leverage and less pricing power, so input and demand shocks hit them harder than the conglomerates.
• Trade policy — tariffs raise imported-nut, oil, packaging, and equipment costs and can threaten export demand.[47]

10. How to invest, and the outlook

Public-market routes. There is no clean "snack food" stock and no snack-specific U.S. ETF (exchange-traded fund); broad consumer-staples funds are the passive proxy. The direct choices:

• Own the economics at scale: PepsiCo (PEP) — the highest-quality way in, though snacks come bundled with beverages and Quaker foods.[18]
• Focused bets (the two pure plays): Utz (UTZ) on chips/pretzels — smaller, more levered, a bet on branded-snack execution and margin recovery; John B. Sanfilippo (JBSS) on nuts/peanut butter — results move with nut crops and private-label volume (peanuts/PB only 16.4% of gross sales).[4][5]
• Partial exposure inside a bigger thesis: Campbell's (CPB) and Hershey (HSY) for salty snacks; Hormel (HRL) for Skippy/Planters, Smucker (SJM) for Jif ($828M in FY2025), Post (POST) for Peter Pan and 8th Avenue; TreeHouse (THS) for the private-label angle.[19][20][21][22][23][24] Because share prices, dividend yields, and valuation multiples reflect the parent, isolating snack exposure means reading segment disclosures.

Private routes. A fertile field on both sides: back or own regional chip/pretzel brands (many still family-held acquisition targets), PE-style contract and private-label manufacturers (Shearer's is the template), grower cooperatives and family nut firms (Blue Diamond, Wonderful, Hampton Farms), or franchised DSD routes. The recurring playbook — buy a strong regional brand, plug it into national distribution and procurement, lift its margin — is exactly what the strategics pay up for, which supports exit multiples.[6][26][27][50]

Near-term outlook (a forward-looking judgment, not a reported fact). The two halves point in different directions and an investor should treat them separately. The larger snack-food half is at a mid-2020s reset — Circana reported 2025 salty-snack retail sales down 0.5%, with flat-to-negative volumes from GLP-1 adoption, value trade-down, and health scrutiny — where owners will compete on reformulation (lower sodium, cleaner labels, natural colors, higher protein), value/pack-price innovation, bold flavors, and continued consolidation; scaled, DSD-advantaged leaders are best positioned, and sub-scale players face selling or specializing.[4] The smaller nut/peanut-butter half looks steadier: U.S. peanut production hit a record ~6.5 billion pounds in 2024/25 and consumption ran 6% above the ten-year average, which should keep input costs contained; watch tree-nut crops and tariffs for snack-nut margins, the branded-vs.-private-label share battle, and plant-reliability/recall risk.[11][52] Neither half is likely to return to its old volume-growth trend, but the level's cash generation, brand loyalty, and defensive demand keep it a durable — if now lower-growth — corner of consumer staples.

---

Sources

1. NAICS Association, "NAICS Code 311919 — Other Snack Food Manufacturing," 2022. https://www.naics.com/naics-code-description/?code=311919
2. Market Growth Reports / Market.us, "Peanut Butter Market Size & Statistics," 2024–2026. https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/peanut-butter-market-115968
3. BakeryandSnacks / EY / Morgan Stanley, "Snack industry faces 2025 reset amid GLP-1; consumption down 40–60% among users; ~4% category decline forecast," 2025. https://www.bakeryandsnacks.com/Article/2025/05/12/snack-industry-faces-2025-reset-amid-glp-1-inflation/
4. Utz Brands, Inc., "2025 Form 10-K — net sales $1.44B; 4.4% category share; ~$42B salty-snack category (Circana); 2025 retail sales down 0.5%." https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1739566/000162828026007757/utz-20251228.htm
5. John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K — ~$1.11B revenue; peanuts/PB 16.4% of gross sales; nuts/commodities ~73% of cost of sales; gross margin 18.4%. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/880117/000095017025110463/jbss-20250626.htm
6. Blue Diamond Growers, 2025 Annual Report. https://bluediamondgrowers.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/BlueDiamond-Annual-Report-2025-web_a11y.pdf
7. NAICS Association, "NAICS Code 311911 — Roasted Nuts and Peanut Butter Manufacturing," 2022. https://www.naics.com/naics-code-description/?code=311911
8. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census — NAICS 311911 (value of shipments $14.42B; 280 establishments; 239 firms; 19,739 employees; $1.06B payroll; CR4 29.6%; CR8 46.3%; CR50 92.7%; HHI 370). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
9. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census — NAICS 311919 (value of shipments $28.1B; 400 firms; CR4 75.5%; CR8 82.1%; CR50 95.8%; HHI suppressed). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
10. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census table EC2231BASIC — NAICS 311919 (483 establishments; 42,678 employees; $2.25B payroll). https://data.census.gov/table/ECNBASIC2022.EC2231BASIC
11. USDA Economic Research Service, "Peanut butter accounts for more than 60 percent of U.S. peanut food use; 2024/25 consumption 6% above ten-year average," 2025. https://ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/114009
12. U.S. Small Business Administration, Table of Small Business Size Standards (311911 = 750 employees; 311919 = 1,250 employees), 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
13. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census — NAICS 31191 (receipts ~$42.56B; 636 firms; CR4/CR8/CR20/CR50 and HHI suppressed). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
14. U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns 2023 — NAICS 31191 (758 establishments; 68,548 employees; annual payroll ~$4.02B). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
15. Market.us, "Peanut Butter Statistics — retail sales ~$5.6B," 2026. https://media.market.us/peanut-butter-statistics/
16. Market Growth Reports, "Peanut Butter Market — snack-nut retail ~$5.2B," 2024. https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/peanut-butter-market-115968
17. USDA Economic Research Service / Univ. of Georgia CAES, "Peanut Situation and 2025 Outlook," 2025. https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/publications/AP130-3-08/peanut-situation-and-2025-outlook/
18. PepsiCo, Inc., "2025 Form 10-K — PepsiCo Foods North America net revenue ~$27.5B; operating profit ~$6.2B; PFNA includes cereal, oatmeal, pasta, dips; savory-snack volume -3%." https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/77476/000007747626000007/pep-20251227.htm
19. The Campbell's Company, "Snacks segment composition and net sales (Snyder's-Lance brands)," FY2024 Form 8-K, 2024. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/16732/000001673224000120/exhibit991-q42024.htm
20. The Hershey Company, "2025 Form 10-K — North America Salty Snacks net sales $1.27B; segment income $241.8M; 19.0% segment margin." https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/47111/000162828026008586/hsy-20251231.htm
21. Food Business News, "Hormel's Planters business recovering from supply disruption," 2024. https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/27319-hormels-planters-business-recovering-from-supply-disruption
22. Accio, "Best Selling Peanut Butter Brands — Jif ~32%, Skippy ~19%, Peter Pan ~13%, private label ~18%," 2025. https://www.accio.com/business/best_selling_peanut_butter_brands
23. J.M. Smucker Co., Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K — Jif product sales $827.8M. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/91419/000009141925000056/sjm-20250430.htm
24. Post Holdings, "Results for the Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2024"; 8th Avenue acquisition announcement (July 2025, ~$880M). https://www.postholdings.com/post-holdings-reports-results-for-the-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2024/
25. Mars, Incorporated / Kellanova, "Mars Completes Acquisition of Kellanova (~$36B); Pringles," Dec 11, 2025. https://newsroom.kellanova.com/2025-12-11-MARS-COMPLETES-ACQUISITION-OF-KELLANOVA
26. Shearer's Foods, "About — largest supplier of private-brand salty snacks in North America; 11 facilities," 2025. https://www.shearers.com/about-shearers/
27. Hampton Farms, "Our Story." https://www.hamptonfarms.com/pages/our-story
28. Wonderful Pistachios, "About Us." https://b2b.wonderfulpistachios.com/about-us
29. PotatoPro, "Challenges Faced by Potato Snack Manufacturers When Frying Oil Prices Rise," 2025. https://www.potatopro.com/news/2025/challenges-faced-potato-snack-manufacturers-when-frying-oil-prices-rise
30. Loyal Food Machines, "Snack manufacturing cost structure — raw materials 15–25% of wholesale price for extruded snacks," 2026. https://loyalfoodmachines.com/12-best-snacks-to-sell-for-profit-in-2026-from-home-kitchen-to-commercial-production/
31. Texas A&M Agricultural & Food Policy Center, "Peanut Stocks Expected to Remain Low in 2025," 2025. https://sat-wp.afpc.tamu.edu/?p=40946
32. Circana, "New Circana snacking research reveals how health, flavor, and innovation are redefining America's cravings — private-label outpacing branded in several categories." https://www.circana.com/post/new-circana-snacking-research-reveals-how-health-flavor-and-innovation-are-redefining-america-s-cr
33. Circana, "How selective consumption is shifting the snackscape — snacks with label claims up 5%," 2026. https://www.circana.com/post/how-selective-consumption-is-shifting-the-snackscape
34. Future Market Insights, "Nut Butters Market Size, Demand & Trends," 2025. https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/nut-butters-market
35. USDA Economic Research Service, Fruit and Tree Nuts Outlook — per-capita tree-nut availability, March 2026. https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/20866/fts-384.pdf?v=55721
36. Farm Progress, "U.S. peanut production up, exports remain strong — record ~$890M exports 2023," 2024. https://www.farmprogress.com/peanut/u-s-peanut-production-up-exports-remain-strong
37. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "FSMA Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food." https://www.fda.gov/food/food-safety-modernization-act-fsma/fsma-final-rule-preventive-controls-human-food
38. Food Safety News, "FDA warns consumers to not eat certain Jif peanut butter because of Salmonella outbreak," 2022. https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2022/05/fda-warns-consumers-to-not-eat-certain-jif-peanut-butter-because-of-salmonella-outbreak/
39. FDA, "Guidance for Industry: Measures to Address the Risk of Contamination by Salmonella Species in Food Containing a Peanut-Derived Product," 2009. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-measures-address-risk-contamination-salmonella-species-food-containing-peanut
40. FDA, "Guidance for Industry: Action Levels for Poisonous or Deleterious Substances in Human Food and Animal Feed." https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-action-levels-poisonous-or-deleterious-substances-human-food-and-animal-feed
41. FDA, "Food Allergies." https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-food-labeling-and-critical-foods/food-allergies?lv=true
42. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "Final Guidance for Industry on How to Reduce Acrylamide in Certain Foods." https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-issues-final-guidance-industry-how-reduce-acrylamide-certain-foods
43. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "Sodium Reduction in the Food Supply." https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-food-labeling-and-critical-foods/sodium-reduction-food-supply
44. Food Business News, "MAHA's impact on the snack category; front-of-pack labeling proposal," 2025. https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/30095-mahas-impact-on-the-snack-category
45. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, "FDA to Revoke Authorization for Use of Red No. 3 in Food and Ingested Drugs — effective January 15, 2027 for food." https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-revoke-authorization-use-red-no-3-food-and-ingested-drugs
46. USDA Farm Service Agency, "USDA Announces Loan Rates for 2024 Crop Peanuts," 2024. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/news-events/news/06-06-2024/usda-announces-loan-rates-2024-crop-peanuts
47. Peanut and Tree Nut Processors Association, "PTNPA Statement on Tariffs," 2025. https://www.ptnpa.org/news/697836/PTNPA-Statement-on-Tariffs.htm
48. PR Newswire / Hormel Foods, "Hormel Foods Adds Another Strategic Leading Brand with the Acquisition of Planters," 2021. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hormel-foods-adds-another-strategic-leading-brand-to-its-portfolio-with-the-acquisition-of-planters-301226478.html
49. Post Holdings, "Post Holdings and Conagra Brands Announce Completion of Acquisition of Peter Pan Peanut Butter Brand," 2021; 8th Avenue acquisition, 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1530950/000153095025000167/ex991_prpostholdingstoacqu.htm
50. Food Dive, "Hormel Foods sells majority stake in Justin's nut butter," 2025. https://www.fooddive.com/news/hormel-foods-sells-51-of-justins-nut-brand/804058/
51. Wikipedia, "2009 Peanut Corporation of America recall," 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Peanut_Corporation_of_America_recall
52. Georgia Farm Bureau, "Georgia peanut, soybean production made gains in 2024 — record ~6.5B lb U.S. peanut production 2024/25," 2024. https://www.gfb.org/news/ag-news/post/georgia-peanut-soybean-production-made-gains-in-2024