Cement Manufacturing in the United States (NAICS 327310)

An investor's primer — for both public-market and private investors

1. Overview

Cement is the gray powder that, when mixed with water, sand, and crushed stone, becomes concrete — the most-used building material on earth. This industry makes the powder, not the concrete. It is a small, capital-heavy, cyclical manufacturing business that sits at the base of nearly every construction project in the country: roads, bridges, dams, foundations, floors, and buildings all depend on it [1].

Why an investor should care: cement is a commodity with unusual pricing power. Because the powder is heavy and cheap relative to its bulk, it is uneconomic to ship far — a bag of cement is worth a fraction of a comparable weight of most goods, so freight quickly swamps the product's value. That single fact turns a national commodity into a patchwork of regional oligopolies (a handful of sellers dominating each local market). A plant that dominates its 150-to-300-mile delivery radius can behave like a local toll booth on construction activity. The trade-offs are steep capital costs, deep exposure to the construction cycle, heavy energy bills, and mounting carbon regulation.

Ways in. Public-market investors can own cement through a short list of listed producers — most of them foreign-parented multinationals with large U.S. footprints, plus a couple of U.S.-listed pure-plays (see Section 4). Private investors reach it through construction-materials platforms, aggregates and ready-mix roll-ups, and infrastructure funds; a large share of U.S. cement capacity is privately held, most notably by Quikrete Holdings after its 2025 takeover of Summit Materials [10].

2. What it is and how it's structured

Scope. NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 327310 covers establishments that manufacture hydraulic cement — portland cement, natural cement, masonry cement, pozzolanic cement, and blended cements — plus the clinker (the fused, marble-sized nodules) that is ground into cement [1][2]. The core process is mineral conversion, not merely grinding rock: limestone, clay, sand, and iron-bearing materials are crushed and blended into raw meal, then heated in a rotary kiln at roughly 1,450°C. Calcination drives carbon dioxide from calcium carbite and forms clinite nodules; the clinker is cooled, ground with gypsum (and, increasingly, limestone or industrial byproducts) into finished cement [3].

Some facilities are integrated plants with quarries and kilns; others are grinding plants that buy domestic or imported clinker and finish it locally. The product normally moves in bulk by truck, rail, barge, or ship to ready-mix plants and concrete-products factories, with bagged product a smaller channel.

What it excludes — this is where investors most often get confused, because "cement" and "concrete" are used loosely in everyday speech:

• Ready-mixed concrete — the wet concrete delivered by rotating-drum trucks — is NAICS 327320, a separate (and much larger by revenue) industry that is the cement industry's biggest customer.
• Concrete products (block, brick, pipe, precast) are NAICS 327331 / 327332 / 327390.
• Lime is 327410; gypsum products are 327420.
• Aggregates — the crushed stone, sand, and gravel that make up most of concrete's volume — are quarried under the mining sector (NAICS 212, e.g. 212321 sand and gravel). Aggregates are a related but distinct business, and several listed "cement" names are really aggregates companies first.

327310 is one node inside NAICS 3273, "Cement and Concrete Product Manufacturing."

Ownership mix. This is a concentrated, corporate industry — not one of tiny owner-operators, and not government-run. A modern integrated cement plant costs on the order of $1 billion to build, which is a natural barrier to entry. Most U.S. capacity is owned by large multinationals (Amrize, Heidelberg Materials, Cemex, CRH, Buzzi, Titan, GCC, Taiheiyo Cement's CalPortland) or by large private domestic firms (Quikrete) [1][17].

3. How big it is

Federal business statistics (U.S. Census Bureau / SBA), NAICS 327310:

Concentration (2022 Economic Census) [5]:

The top four firms make just over half the industry's revenue, and the top 20 make essentially all of it. The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI, a standard concentration gauge where above 1,800 is "highly concentrated") of ~1,034 reads as only moderately concentrated at the national level — but that understates reality. Because cement travels short distances, the market that matters is regional, and most metros are served by only two or three plants. Local concentration is far higher than the national number suggests. An Amrize registration statement, citing American Cement Association data, puts the top five producers at approximately 57% of U.S. cement output [7].

The physical picture (USGS). The U.S. Geological Survey tracks the commodity itself and gives a fuller operating snapshot than the business census. In 2025 the United States produced an estimated 84 million metric tons of cement (including 69 million metric tons of clinker, about 82 million tons of portland and blended cement plus 2.1 million tons of masonry cement) at 97 plants across 34 states and Puerto Rico. Texas, Missouri, California, and Florida led output and together made about 44% of the total. Shipments to final customers reached approximately 100 million metric tons valued at about $17 billion, with an average mill unit value of $160 per metric ton. Apparent consumption (including imports) was approximately 110 million metric tons. An estimated 70–75% went to ready-mixed concrete producers, about 11% to concrete-product makers, 8–10% to contractors, and 5–10% to other customers [1].

A note on the numbers. Two things are worth flagging honestly. First, the Census receipts figure ($11.7 billion, 2022) and the USGS shipment value (~$17 billion, 2025) are not contradictory — they cover different years, and the USGS value also captures imported cement resold domestically during a period of sharp price increases. Second, this is a rare industry that federal business statistics capture well — it is not undercounted by government providers or fragmented micro-operators. But the ~12,800 direct manufacturing jobs badly understate its economic weight: cement is capital-intensive, not labor-intensive, and its real footprint shows up downstream in the far larger ready-mix, concrete-products, and construction chain it feeds. (USGS's 97 integrated/grinding plants versus the Census's 192 establishments reflects the terminals, grinding stations, and administrative sites also coded to 327310.)

4. The investable universe

There is no large-cap, U.S.-listed cement pure-play. Most of the U.S. industry is owned by foreign-listed multinationals or by private firms; the cleanest listed exposures are a spun-off North American giant and a handful of building-materials companies for which cement is one segment among aggregates, concrete, and wallboard.

Publicly listed producers with U.S. cement operations:

Two common tickers investors reach for are not cement bets: Vulcan Materials (VMC) is essentially a pure aggregates/asphalt/ready-mix company with no meaningful cement production, and Martin Marietta (MLM) is aggregates-first with a small cement segment. Own them for construction-materials exposure, not for cement specifically.

Major private / other owners:

• Quikrete Holdings — private; became a top-tier U.S. cement force by acquiring Summit Materials for ~$11.5 billion (announced 2024, closed February 2025); Summit had itself just absorbed Argos USA [10].
• Ash Grove Cement — owned by CRH.
• Lehigh Hanson — owned by Heidelberg Materials.
• CalPortland — owned by Japan's Taiheiyo Cement [17].
• Numerous single-plant and regional operators (e.g. National Cement, Continental Cement, Mitsubishi Cement, St Marys/Votorantim) round out the tail [16].

5. How the money works

Cement is a fixed-cost, capacity-utilization business wrapped in local pricing power. The levers that actually drive owner returns:

• Capacity utilization. A kiln has enormous fixed costs and runs best flat-out. When plants run near capacity, each incremental ton is highly profitable; when construction slows and utilization falls, margins collapse. The U.S. industry has spent years with idle and underutilized capacity — USGS estimates 2025 clinker production of 69 million metric tons against 100 million metric tons of clinker capacity, and CRH reports its cement kilns operated at an average 72% utilization in 2025 — which is why producers have closed or converted marginal plants (recent shutdowns in California, Maine, New York, and Colorado) [1][20].
• Price per ton (the "mill net"). The USGS average mill unit value in 2025 was $160 per metric ton [1]. Because freight is such a large share of delivered cost, producers price at the plant gate and pass freight to the buyer; the winner is whoever sits closest to the pour. Industry-wide average mill value increased from $127 per metric ton in 2021 to $160 in 2025 even though apparent consumption was roughly flat — evidence of strong price realization over this period, although it does not guarantee pricing will remain insensitive to future excess supply [1].
• Energy. Fuel (coal, petroleum coke, natural gas, and increasingly alternative fuels like tires and waste) plus electricity typically make up a large slice of cash production cost. Energy price swings move margins directly, which is why producers invest in efficient preheater/precalciner kilns and fuel-switching flexibility [11][15].
• Freight and geography. Cement moves ~150–300 miles by truck economically — Cemex says most of its U.S. cement is sold within approximately 200 miles of a plant [15]. Plants on navigable water or near rail compete over wider areas; inland plants enjoy captive local markets. Coastal markets are disciplined by imports, which act as swing supply and cap local prices.
• Vertical integration. The best-returning models push downstream into aggregates and ready-mix concrete, capturing margin along the chain and locking in a captive buyer for their cement.

In strong markets, well-run integrated producers earn EBITDA margins in the mid-20s to mid-30s percent. Eagle Materials' fiscal 2025 cement segment illustrates the sensitivities: revenue was $1.2 billion, operating earnings $319.5 million, and operating margin 27%; relative to the prior year, higher prices contributed $35.4 million while lower volume reduced earnings by approximately $17.5 million [12]. The business is prized for pricing resilience — cement prices tend to hold or rise even through soft-volume years — but punished in downturns by its operating leverage.

6. What drives demand

Cement demand is essentially derived demand for construction, split across three end markets:

• Residential — foundations, slabs, driveways. Highly sensitive to mortgage rates and home prices; the near-term drag on the whole industry [22].
• Nonresidential / commercial — warehouses, factories, offices. Mostly soft lately, with one large exception: a data-center construction boom tied to AI and cloud buildout is a genuine bright spot [22].
• Infrastructure / public works — highways, bridges, airports, water. The most cement-intensive category per dollar. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA, 2021) put ~$1.2 trillion into play, roughly $500 billion of it for roads, bridges, and major projects; as of late 2025 only about 40% had been spent, so it should support demand for several more years [22].

Demand is cyclical and rate-sensitive. During the first eight months of 2025, total U.S. construction put in place decreased 1.8% from the comparable 2024 period; single-family housing starts through August fell 4.9% (while multifamily starts increased 17.5%); cement shipments through the first nine months fell 2.1% [1]. The American Cement Association (ACA, formerly the Portland Cement Association) projected U.S. consumption to dip about 1.6% in 2025, then return to modest growth in 2026 and stronger growth in 2027 as housing and infrastructure headwinds fade — a forward-looking view, not a certainty [22].

7. Regulation

Cement is one of the most heavily environmentally regulated manufacturing industries, and the regulatory arc points one direction: decarbonization.

• Air toxics. Plants must meet the EPA's NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) for Portland cement — the 2010 "PC MACT" rule limiting mercury, hydrochloric acid, particulates, and total hydrocarbons. Kilns also emit acid gases, organic hazardous air pollutants, metals, and dioxins. Most plants installed emissions-control equipment to comply [3][23].
• Criteria pollutants and GHGs. Cement kilns are regulated under the Clean Air Act for nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and particulates. EPA requires separate reporting of both fuel-combustion and calcination greenhouse-gas emissions under Subpart H [24].
• Carbon is the defining issue. Cement is responsible for an outsized share of global CO₂ — commonly cited around 7–8% — because most of the emissions are chemical, released when limestone is heated to make clinker, not just from burning fuel. DOE attributes 58% of 2015 U.S. cement-industry CO₂ to calcination — meaning fuel switching alone cannot fully decarbonize conventional clinker [25]. That makes cement one of the hardest industries to decarbonize.
• State-level mandates. California law (SB 596) requires a cement-sector strategy targeting greenhouse-gas intensity 40% below baseline by 2035 and net-zero emissions by 2045, a leading edge of policy risk [26].

The industry's main responses:

1. Blended cements. Portland-Limestone Cement (PLC, "Type IL") replaces some clinker with ground limestone, cutting CO₂ per ton by roughly 10%. It is now approved in all 50 states and D.C.; blended cements were about 63% of shipments in the first nine months of 2025, with approximately 95% of those blended shipments being PLC [1][27]. This is a fast, cheap decarbonization lever and effectively adds capacity, since less clinker is needed per ton of cement.
2. Supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) — fly ash, slag, natural pozzolans, calcined clay — further cut clinker content. But conventional fly-ash availability is declining as coal-fired generating plants retire or convert to other fuels [12]. Companies are investing in "harvested" ash from legacy disposal sites: CRH paid $2.1 billion for Eco Material Technologies, which processes approximately 7 million tons of fly ash and 3 million tons of synthetic gypsum and other materials annually [20].
3. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) — the long-term route to deep cuts, supported by federal 45Q tax credits and Department of Energy grants. A federally supported Heidelberg project in Indiana is designed to capture at least 95% of plant CO₂, prevent 2 million metric tons of annual emissions, and receive a federal cost share of up to $500 million — demonstrating both the potential and the very large capital requirement [28].
4. Alternative fuels — burning waste-derived fuels to displace coal.

Policy risk cuts both ways: tighter carbon rules raise costs, but federal incentives (45Q, IIJA "Buy Clean" procurement favoring low-carbon cement) can reward the cleanest producers.

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

The story of U.S. cement over the past decade is consolidation and foreign ownership. Domestic producers were largely rolled up into global majors: Lafarge and Holcim merged (2015); CRH bought Ash Grove (2018); Heidelberg absorbed Lehigh. More recently:

• Summit Materials acquired Argos USA (2024), then agreed to be taken private by Quikrete for ~$11.5 billion (2024, closed February 2025) — creating a vertically integrated private giant [10].
• CRH bought Martin Marietta's South Texas cement business for $2.1 billion (2023), and separately acquired Eco Material Technologies for $2.1 billion (2025) to secure SCM supply [19][20].
• Heidelberg Materials acquired Giant Cement for approximately $600 million (2024) — one plant with 800,000 metric tons of annual capacity, two deep-water import terminals, five distribution terminals, and an alternative-fuel business [21].
• Holcim spun off its entire North American business as Amrize, a separately listed company, in June 2025 — instantly the largest cement producer in the U.S. and Canada [8].
• Titan America carved out a U.S. listing via IPO in early 2025 [13].

Competition inside each region is a stable oligopoly: high entry costs, long permitting timelines for new quarries and kilns, and freight economics all protect incumbents. The main competitive threat to domestic producers is imports — the U.S. was 21% net-import-reliant in 2025, importing approximately 23 million metric tons of hydraulic cement and 660,000 metric tons of clinker while exporting approximately 1 million metric tons. Over 2021–24, import sources were mainly Turkey (32%), Canada (20%), Vietnam (13%), and Greece (9%) [1]. Imports both fill a genuine domestic capacity shortfall and discipline coastal prices, which is why trade policy and tariffs are a live swing factor for U.S. producers. The ordinary U.S. tariff schedule listed clinker and the principal hydraulic cements as duty-free at normal trade relations as of December 31, 2025, though country-specific and temporary trade measures can change all-in landed costs [29].

9. Risks

• Construction cyclicality. The dominant risk. High operating leverage means volume downturns hit margins hard; the industry is exposed to interest rates, housing, and public-budget cycles [22].
• Energy costs. Large, volatile input; spikes compress margins quickly [15].
• Carbon regulation and transition cost. The hardest-to-abate emissions profile of any major material — 58% of industry CO₂ comes from calcination chemistry, not fuel [25]. CCUS is capital-heavy and unproven at scale. Rules could raise costs faster than low-carbon products can offset them. Cemex identifies potential carbon taxes, allowance costs, higher energy costs, new equipment, alternative feedstocks, and reduced profitability as consequences of tighter policy [15][28].
• Import competition and trade policy. Roughly 21% of U.S. supply is imported; tariff changes and foreign capacity swing coastal pricing both ways [1].
• Overcapacity / underutilization. Idle capacity has pressured returns; CRH reports 72% average kiln utilization in 2025 [20]. A demand air-pocket can quickly turn plants unprofitable [1].
• Equipment and operating risk. Kilns run hot, continuously, and under abrasive conditions; unplanned downtime sacrifices both volume and absorption of fixed costs. Amrize attributed $50 million of additional third-quarter 2025 manufacturing and distribution cost to a temporary cement-network equipment outage [9].
• Foreign-parent and single-segment exposure. Several listed routes carry currency risk (foreign parents) or dilute the cement thesis inside a broader materials portfolio.
• Local permitting and reserves. Plants depend on long-lived limestone reserves and hard-to-replace permits; a plant without a quarry has no business. Permitting is both a risk and a moat — an incumbent with long-lived reserves gains pricing power because replacement capacity is hard to permit.

10. How to invest, and the outlook

Public-market routes.

• Largest, cleanest exposure: Amrize (AMRZ) — the newly independent North American leader, cement-heavy but also roofing and building envelope [8].
• U.S. pure-play flavor: Eagle Materials (EXP) — domestic cement plus gypsum wallboard, no foreign-currency overlay [11]; Titan America (TTAM) for East-coast cement [13].
• Diversified materials with cement inside: CRH, Martin Marietta (MLM), Cemex (CX) — own these for broad construction-materials exposure, with cement as one lever [15][19][20].
• Foreign majors via ADRs: Heidelberg Materials (HDELY), Buzzi (BZZUY), GCC — direct exposure but with cross-listing and FX considerations [18][21].

When you get to valuation, cement/materials names typically trade on EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) and free-cash-flow yield rather than simple price/earnings, reflecting the heavy capital base and depreciation load; dividends and buybacks are common in the mature majors.

Private routes. Because so much U.S. capacity is privately held, private investors reach cement through construction-materials private equity, aggregates/ready-mix roll-ups, and infrastructure funds — or indirectly through the debt and equity of platforms like Quikrete's Summit assets. Physical plants rarely trade; when they do, they move in large corporate transactions, not on the open market. Recent transaction scale illustrates the required capital: Quikrete's Summit acquisition carried approximately $11.5 billion of enterprise value, Heidelberg's Giant transaction approximately $600 million, and CRH's Eco Material acquisition $2.1 billion [10][20][21].

Smaller private-market routes are more plausible through import and distribution terminals, regional ready-mix or precast companies that are captive cement buyers, quarry and logistics assets, alternative-fuel processors, fly-ash or slag beneficiation, natural-pozzolan projects, plant-maintenance contractors, and decarbonization technology. These are economically adjacent exposures, not all NAICS 327310 businesses.

Central diligence variables for a plant investment: regional supply-demand balance rather than national consumption alone; remaining permitted quarry reserves; kiln age and reliability; fuel and power contracts; rail, barge, or port access; terminal network; customer concentration and affiliated ready-mix outlets; clinker factor and SCM access; environmental compliance history; required maintenance and decarbonization capital; and exposure to imported cement.

Near-term outlook (forward-looking, not assured). The setup is a soft 2025 giving way to recovery: consumption expected to dip ~1.6% in 2025, then grow modestly in 2026 and more strongly in 2027 as mortgage rates ease and infrastructure spending accelerates [22]. The bull case rests on the large, still-unspent IIJA pipeline (~60% of the roads-and-bridges money still to flow) and the data-center construction boom; the bear case is a housing-led slowdown, an energy-cost spike, or an import surge. Structurally, the industry's pricing discipline, high entry barriers, and consolidated regional markets remain intact — the swing variable is the construction cycle, and the long-term overhang is the cost and pace of decarbonization.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Geological Survey, "Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cement," 2026. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-cement.pdf
2. U.S. Census Bureau, NAICS 327310 definition. https://www.census.gov/naics/?details=327310&input=327310&year=2007
3. U.S. EPA, "Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: National Emission Standards" (process description), 2024. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/portland-cement-manufacturing-industry-national-emission-standards
4. U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns 2023 (NAICS 327310), 2024. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
5. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census — Concentration Ratios / Selected Statistics (NAICS 327310), 2025. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
6. U.S. Small Business Administration, "Table of Small Business Size Standards," 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
7. Amrize Ltd, Registration Statement (top-five concentration data citing American Cement Association), 2025. https://www.holcim.com/sites/holcim/files/docs/20250602_8k_amrize_registration_statement_update.pdf
8. Amrize Ltd, "Amrize Completes Spin-Off from Holcim; Begins Trading as AMRZ" and full-year 2025 results, 2025. https://investors.amrize.com/news/detail/122/amrize-delivers-strong-free-cash-flow-in-2025-shareholder-return-plan-proposed
9. Amrize Ltd, 2025 Form 10-K and Q3 2025 earnings release, 2025–2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2035989/000203598926000017/holcim-20251231.htm
10. Rock Products Magazine, "Instant Analysis: Summit–Quikrete Deal a Win-Win," 2024; Summit Materials merger filing, 2025. https://rockproducts.com/2024/11/26/instant-analysis-summit-quikcrete-deal-a-win-win/
11. Eagle Materials Inc., "Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2025 Results," 2025. https://ir.eaglematerials.com/news-releases/news-release-details/eagle-materials-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2025
12. Eagle Materials Inc., Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K (segment economics), 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/918646/000095017025075321/exp-20250331.htm
13. Cleary Gottlieb, "Titan America in $384 Million IPO," 2025. https://www.clearygottlieb.com/news-and-insights/news-listing/titan-america-in-384-million-ipo
14. Titan America, 2025 Form 10-K (capacity figures), 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2035304/000203530426000047/ttam-20251231.htm
15. Cemex S.A.B. de C.V., Form 20-F (FY2025) — U.S. cement operations and capacity, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001076378/000119312526177605/d120395d20f.htm
16. American Cement Association, corporate membership listing, 2025. https://www.cement.org/the-association/membership/corporate-members/
17. Taiheiyo Cement Corporation, Sustainability Report 2025 (identifying CalPortland), 2025. https://www.taiheiyo-cement.co.jp/english/csr/pdf/data/2025/Taiheiyo-Cement-rep2025en_a4.pdf
18. Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua (GCC), investor materials — U.S. plants and terminals, 2025. https://www.ir.gcc.com/en/inversionistas/media
19. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP / Pit & Quarry, "Martin Marietta's $2.1 Billion Sale of South Texas Cement Operations to CRH plc," 2023. https://www.pitandquarry.com/crh-martin-marietta-make-a-deal-in-texas/
20. CRH plc, 2025 Form 10-K (kiln utilization, quarry properties) and Eco Material Technologies acquisition announcement, 2025–2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/849395/000162828026009043/crh-20251231.htm
21. Heidelberg Materials, "Heidelberg Materials to acquire Giant Cement Holding," 2024. https://www.heidelbergmaterials.com/en/pr-2024-11-28
22. American Cement Association, "U.S. Cement Consumption Expected to Dip — Spring 2025 Economic Forecast," 2025. https://www.cement.org/2025/05/19/u-s-cement-consumption-expected-to-dip-recession-not-a-foregone-conclusion-in-cement-industry-associations-spring-economic-forecast/
23. U.S. EPA, "NESHAP for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry: Fact Sheet," 2024. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/neshap-portland-cement-manufacturing-industry-fact-sheet
24. U.S. EPA, "Subpart H Information Sheet" (GHG reporting for cement), 2024. https://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/subpart-h-information-sheet
25. U.S. Department of Energy, "Industrial Decarbonization Roadmap," 2022. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Industrial%20Decarbonization%20Roadmap.pdf
26. California Air Resources Board, "Net-Zero Emissions Strategy for Cement Sector" (SB 596), 2024. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/net-zero-emissions-strategy-cement-sector
27. Federal Highway Administration, "Portland-Limestone Cement" (FHWA-HRT-23-104), and American Cement Association PLC materials, 2023–2024. https://highways.dot.gov/media/34231
28. U.S. Department of Energy, "Industrial Demonstrations Program: Selected and Awarded Projects — Cement and Concrete," 2025. https://www.energy.gov/cmei/oced/industrial-demonstrations-program-selected-and-awarded-projects-cement-and-concrete
29. U.S. International Trade Commission, Harmonized Tariff Schedule (2523.10.00.00), 2026. https://hts.usitc.gov/search?query=2523.10.00.00