Other Community Housing Services (NAICS 624229): An Investor's Primer

1. Overview

"Other Community Housing Services" is the federal statistical bucket for a specific slice of the housing-and-social-services world: organizations that provide transitional housing for low-income people, that build or fix low-cost housing with volunteer and "sweat equity" labor, and that repair homes for elderly or disabled homeowners so they can stay put safely. Energy-bill-assistance programs are also classified here.[1] Think Habitat for Humanity swinging hammers, a nonprofit running an 18-month program that moves a family from a shelter toward a permanent apartment, or volunteers replacing a disabled veteran's furnace.

This is not, in the usual sense, a "sector you buy." It is overwhelmingly a nonprofit- and government-funded field. Under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), code 624229 is dominated by 501(c)(3) charities (tax-exempt nonprofits), faith-based groups, and local agencies that live off government grants and donations — there are essentially no publicly traded pure-play companies here. So why should an investor care?

• Public-market investors get exposure only indirectly and adjacently: through lenders and asset managers that finance affordable and supportive housing, through state housing-agency and municipal bonds, and by understanding a demand backdrop (record homelessness, an aging population, a housing-affordability crisis) that ripples into homebuilders, apartment owners, and building-products companies.
• Private investors have more direct, though specialized, routes: Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) equity funds, community-development notes, social-impact ("pay-for-success") bonds, and program-related philanthropy.

The live, forward-looking hook is a sharp federal policy pivot: in 2026 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) began steering money back toward transitional housing for the first time since 2012 — a potential tailwind for exactly the operators in this code, but one wrapped in litigation and execution risk (Sections 7 and 10).[2][3]

2. What it is, and what it excludes

The Census Bureau defines 624229 as establishments primarily providing one or more of: (1) transitional housing for low-income individuals and families; (2) volunteer construction or repair of low-cost housing, in partnership with a homeowner who may help with the work; and (3) repair of homes for elderly or disabled owners. Operators may subsidize housing using existing homes, apartments, hotels, or motels, may require a low-cost mortgage or sweat equity, and may hand low-income families furniture and household supplies. Energy-assistance and volunteer home-repair organizations are indexed here.[1] The common thread is housing bundled with a social-service mission — not a market-rate landlord, and not a for-profit builder.

How a project is typically structured. Even in the nonprofit world, a single development can layer several parties: a nonprofit or public-agency sponsor; a special-purpose owner entity (often a limited liability company or limited partnership) holding the building; a developer, contractor, and property manager; a capital stack of subsidies, grants, tax-credit equity, debt, and philanthropy; and resident services such as case management, employment help, or housing navigation.

What it excludes (and the adjacent codes where those activities live):

• Emergency/temporary shelters for the homeless → NAICS 624221 (Temporary Shelters), the sibling code. The line is duration and intent: a 30-day shelter bed is 624221; a two-year program aimed at permanent housing is 624229.[1]
• Soup kitchens and food banks → NAICS 624210 (Community Food Services); disaster/emergency relief → 624230.
• Group homes with on-site personal or medical care (mental-health or substance-use recovery) → NAICS 623220 / 623990 (residential care).
• Plain subsidized or low-rent apartment operation without on-site social services → NAICS 531110 (Lessors of Residential Buildings), or 531311 (residential property managers) — an ordinary landlord/manager, even if the tenants are low-income.
• For-profit homebuilding and remodeling → NAICS 236115/236116/236117/236118.
• Government housing agencies — HUD field offices and public housing authorities administering vouchers and programs → NAICS 925110 (Administration of Housing Programs). This exclusion matters a lot for reading the size numbers below.[1]

Ownership mix. Predominantly tax-exempt nonprofits and faith-based organizations, many organized as local affiliates under a national brand (Habitat for Humanity, Rebuilding Together). For-profit ownership is rare and usually incidental. Because most operators are charities, their finances are public in IRS (Internal Revenue Service) Form 990 filings rather than SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) filings.

3. How big it is

Our ground-truth federal statistics for the employer portion of the industry (these series cover different reference years and should not be summed into one income statement):

It is a small, low-payroll industry on paper. Payroll is about 28% of receipts — the rest is grants, donations, and pass-through housing subsidies moving through the books. Nearly every operator is a "small business" by the U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) $19 million receipts threshold, and the median establishment is tiny.

What our figures do not include. They cover no occupancy, capacity utilization, average rent, operating margin, debt level, or cost-per-resident data — those metrics do not exist at the federal level for this code and must be collected at the provider or project level; we do not estimate them here.

And the totals materially undercount the real footprint — for three reasons that are unusually strong in this code:

1. Volunteer and in-kind labor is invisible to payroll. Habitat for Humanity's U.S.-and-global federated network alone is estimated at roughly $3.1 billion of annual activity, versus a fraction of that booked at the international parent;[7] Rebuilding Together mobilizes about 100,000 volunteers on roughly 10,000 projects a year.[8] Donated materials, donated homes, and homeowner sweat equity never show up as receipts or wages.
2. Government-run programs are classified elsewhere (925110), so the public sector that funds and sometimes delivers these services is excluded from the count.
3. Sub-employer operators are omitted. County Business Patterns counts only establishments with paid employees; the long tail of all-volunteer, faith-based, and one-person housing ministries falls below that line. (One commercial database counts ~2,267 "active companies" and ~57,000 employees — a similar order of magnitude, and similarly limited to organized operators.)[9]

Bottom line: the ~$12 billion / ~63,000-employee picture is the paid, formal core of a substantially larger volunteer- and grant-driven ecosystem.

4. The investable universe

There are no publicly listed pure-play stocks in this industry. This is the single most important fact for a public-market investor: 624229 is a nonprofit/government field, and the "companies" are charities. Tickers, share prices, dividend yields, and valuation multiples do not apply to the operators themselves. The largest true in-code operators are national nonprofits and their local affiliates:

Where a public-market investor can actually get (adjacent) exposure. No listed company maps cleanly to 624229; the names below are enabling or financing exposures to the surrounding affordable- and supportive-housing economy, not pure plays on this code. Their results are driven mainly by conventional lending, apartment, or asset-management economics.

Major private owners and operators. Private capital reaches this space mostly through affordable-housing developers, owners, managers, and nonprofit housing platforms. Most are classified under adjacent codes (531110, 236xxx) rather than 624229 itself, but they own, build, finance, or service the housing that sits next to it:

• Nonprofit, program-enriched housing (closest to the code): Mercy Housing (developer/owner/manager/financier of service-enriched affordable housing)[32]; Volunteers of America National Services (VOANS, nonprofit housing-and-health affiliate)[33]; National Church Residences (affordable senior housing and services)[34]; Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH, developer/owner with resident services)[35].
• For-profit / private affordable-housing platforms: The Michaels Organization[27]; Related Affordable (the affordable arm of Related Companies)[28]; Dominium[29]; WinnCompanies[30]; Avanath Capital Management[31]; National Community Renaissance (National CORE)[36].

Publicly traded exposure to the in-code work exists only diffusely — for example, large banks book billions in LIHTC equity to earn Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) credit, but that is a rounding item inside a diversified bank, not a play on this industry.

5. How the money works

Because owners here are mission-driven, "how you make money" means "how the organization covers its costs and builds reserves," not how it maximizes profit. Revenue models differ by role in the chain:

• Direct service providers: government grants and contracts, per-unit or per-person service payments, donations and foundation grants, and limited resident payments.
• Housing owners: restricted (below-market) rents, rental assistance, operating subsidies, tax-credit equity, grants, and mortgage debt.
• Developers and managers: developer fees, property- and asset-management fees, construction income, and loan/refinancing/disposition proceeds.
• Tax-credit investors: returns come primarily as federal tax credits and tax losses rather than market rent growth.

The dominant public levers. For the in-code nonprofits, government money is the biggest input: HUD's Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grants, the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)[22] and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture) rural repair funds, and energy programs (Section 6). The LIHTC gives owners of qualified low-income rental buildings a federal tax credit over a multi-year credit period, subject to affordability and compliance rules.[21] Private philanthropy (individual, foundation, and corporate — e.g., Rebuilding Together's retailer-sponsored repair campaigns)[8] and in-kind donations (land, materials, volunteer hours) round out the stack.

The metrics owners and funders actually watch (the affordable-housing equivalents of "same-store sales" or "occupancy"):

• Cost per household served and cost per unit built or repaired — the core efficiency ratio funders benchmark.
• Program-expense ratio — the share of spending that reaches the mission versus overhead; a key donor and charity-rating signal.
• Occupancy / bed utilization and throughput — how fast residents exit into permanent housing (increasingly the outcome that triggers payment; Section 7).
• Grant renewal rate and revenue diversification — dependence on any single government stream.
• Housing retention, rent-collection/subsidy timing, and compliance/audit history.
• Net assets / operating reserve — the nonprofit's "book value" cushion; and, for property-owning entities, net operating income (NOI), reserves, and debt-service coverage ratio (DSCR).

Any surplus becomes net assets — a reserve, not a distribution. The binding constraints are the grant calendar, donor cyclicality, and construction-cost inflation.

6. What drives demand

Demand is driven by housing distress — and it is high and rising:

• Homelessness and unaffordability. HUD's January 2024 point-in-time (PIT) count found 771,480 people experiencing homelessness, up 18% year over year — the highest on record.[11] Rising rents, evictions, and a shortage of affordable units feed the pipeline into transitional and supportive programs.
• An aging population and "aging in place." More elderly and disabled homeowners on fixed incomes need repairs, weatherization, and accessibility retrofits (ramps, grab bars, furnace replacement) to stay in their homes — the core of the home-repair leg.[8][12]
• Federal appropriations and policy. Because government grants dominate the revenue stack, need that gets served tracks the budget. HUD awarded roughly $3.5–3.6 billion through the FY2024 CoC competition;[13] the FY2026 competition is on the order of $4 billion, with about $1.3 billion carved out for new transitional-housing and supportive-service projects under the 2026 pivot.[2][3][18] Energy assistance is a large adjacent driver: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) has been funded at roughly $4 billion,[14] and the Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) at about $329 million (~$6,500 per home), both prioritizing the elderly and disabled.[15] USDA's Section 504 program lends up to $40,000 and grants up to $10,000 to very-low-income rural (and elderly) homeowners for repairs.[16]
• Energy prices and disasters. Utility-cost spikes and natural disasters both surge the repair/energy-assistance workload.

The through-line: need is structural and counter-cyclical, but the industry's capacity to meet it is gated by appropriations and donations, which are pro-cyclical. That mismatch is the defining tension of the sector — and the base case is that demand keeps outrunning many local markets' ability to fund it.

7. Regulation

• HUD program rules. The 2009 HEARTH Act (Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing) created the modern Continuum of Care framework that governs how federal homelessness money is competed for and spent.[17] Operators live and die by HUD's annual Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) and its eligibility, data (Homeless Management Information System, HMIS), and outcome-reporting rules.[22]
• The 2026 policy pivot (a live story). For most of the 2010s, HUD's "Housing First" orientation steered money toward permanent supportive housing and rapid re-housing, and new transitional-housing funding stopped after FY2012 — a big reason transitional beds fell sharply over that period.[11] In 2026, HUD reversed course: its FY2026 NOFO reprioritizes transitional housing and supportive services, sets aside about $1.3 billion for new projects, and frames a "treatment/recovery-first" approach.[2][3] This is a potential demand tailwind specifically for 624229 operators — but it is contested: implementation has faced litigation delays, and Congress has at points directed HUD to renew expired prior-year grants, injecting real uncertainty into timing and durability.[18]
• Tax and transparency. Most operators are IRS 501(c)(3) charities — donations are deductible, and finances are disclosed on Form 990. Organizations spending federal awards above set thresholds face Single Audit (Uniform Guidance) requirements.
• Housing, accessibility, and building law. The Fair Housing Act (no discrimination by race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, or disability),[23] Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility standards, LIHTC income-and-rent compliance,[21] state/local zoning, building and fire codes, landlord-tenant law, environmental review for federally funded projects, and prevailing-wage (Davis-Bacon) rules on some federal construction all apply.

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

By the numbers, this is one of the most fragmented industries you will encounter. Our federal concentration data show the top 4 firms hold just 13.9% of receipts, the top 8 17.2%, the top 20 23.5%, and the top 50 32.8% — with a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) of 58.4 as reported by the Economic Census (on its 0–10,000 scale, anything under ~1,500 is "unconcentrated"; 58 is effectively atomized).[5]

Why so fragmented, and what "competition" even means here:

• Local by nature. Housing repair and transitional programs are inherently place-based; a national brand like Habitat or Rebuilding Together is really a federation of independent local affiliates sharing a name, standards, and back-office support — not a consolidated operating company.[7][8]
• They compete for inputs, not customers. Operators don't fight over paying customers; they compete for grants, contracts, donors, volunteers, land, tax credits, and staff, and relationships with housing authorities, hospitals, and local governments matter as much as price. HUD's move to a more competitive, performance-based CoC — ending automatic renewal for underperformers — sharpens that grant competition and could thin the ranks of weaker providers.[2]
• Consolidation is quiet but real. Under funding strain, small human-services nonprofits increasingly merge or absorb one another to share administrative cost. Scale genuinely helps with grant-writing and compliance, tax-credit and debt financing, property management, data systems, and pipelines — but regulatory covenants, local politics, donor expectations, and mission constraints make integration slower than an ordinary property-services roll-up. Expect consolidation through nonprofit mergers, affordable-property acquisitions, preservation transactions, and fee-management platforms rather than a national roll-up.

9. Risks

• Government-funding concentration and policy whiplash. The single biggest risk. Budgets, the annual CoC competition, per-project renewal decisions, litigation over NOFO changes, and government shutdowns can swing an operator's revenue sharply — and the ideological pendulum between "Housing First" and "treatment-first" resets priorities every few years.[2][18]
• Funding timing. Reimbursement delays can create working-capital stress even on contracts that are ultimately profitable.
• Donation cyclicality and tax-law sensitivity. Recessions cut giving precisely when need rises; changes to the charitable or standard deduction can dent individual donations.
• Construction and operating cost inflation. Materials, land, skilled labor, utilities, property taxes, and insurance erode how many homes a fixed grant can build or repair.
• Volunteer and staffing supply. The economics depend on free labor and on hard-to-retain service staff; a drop in either raises real costs.
• Compliance and performance pressure. Fair-housing, accessibility, safety, reporting, and tax-credit failures can trigger penalties or loss of funding — and outcome-based, pay-for-success funding shifts results risk onto operators, who must now prove housing stability to get paid.
• Financing and interest rates. Higher rates raise debt costs and lower the value of the tax credits that fund the surrounding affordable-housing pipeline (Section 10), indirectly squeezing supply; weak reserves and refinancing gaps can impair owners and lenders.
• Local and data concentration. A provider may depend heavily on one city, contract, or funder; and the federal statistics' blind spots (volunteer, government, and tiny-operator activity) make market sizing and benchmarking genuinely hard.

10. How to invest, and the outlook

Public-market routes (all indirect). Because there are no listed pure-plays, treat WD, ABR, and BX as enabling/financing exposures and AVB/EQR as broad multifamily exposure with only a slice of affordable housing — not as direct industry proxies. Beyond individual names:

• Bank equity with LIHTC/CRA books. Banks supply the bulk of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit equity — an estimated ~$25 billion annual market in which financial institutions provide up to 99% of project equity, largely to earn CRA credit.[19] It is a small, stable contributor inside a diversified bank, not a targeted bet.
• Housing bonds. State Housing Finance Agency (HFA) bonds and municipal housing-revenue bonds fund affordable-housing production and are available to ordinary fixed-income investors.
• Diffuse equity exposure via homebuilders, apartment REITs, and building-products firms that benefit from the same affordability/repair demand — but these sit in other NAICS codes, not here.

Whatever the wrapper, underwrite the specifics: the disclosed share of affordable revenue, fee income, and tax-credit assets; debt maturities and refinancing needs; and regulatory exposure — rather than assuming any housing-related name is a direct 624229 proxy.

Private routes (more direct, more specialized).

• LIHTC equity funds through syndicators (e.g., Enterprise Community Investment, National Equity Fund, and bank-affiliated affordable-housing funds). Returns come chiefly as federal tax credits and losses rather than cash yield, and are mostly sized for institutions and high-tax corporations.[19][21]
• Affordable-housing real-estate funds, project-level preferred equity, mezzanine or bridge debt, and joint ventures with nonprofit or private owners.
• Community-development notes / CDFI investing. Fixed-income-style notes from Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and impact intermediaries channel capital into affordable and supportive housing at concessionary yields.
• Social-impact / pay-for-success bonds. Investors fund a program up front and are repaid by government only if outcomes are hit. Denver's $8.6 million supportive-housing social-impact bond, for instance, ultimately paid investors about $9.6 million after meeting housing-stability and reduced-incarceration targets.[20] These are bespoke, illiquid, and outcome-contingent.
• Direct philanthropy. For many, the honest "investment" here is a tax-deductible donation to an operator — still the dominant way private capital actually reaches the work.

For any of these, underwriting should focus on the durability of subsidies and contracts, the capital stack and reserve funding, property condition, occupancy and retention, local approvals, compliance history, and measurable resident outcomes.

Outlook. The demand backdrop is structurally strong and, if anything, worsening: record homelessness, an aging population needing home repair, and a persistent affordability gap point to years of elevated need.[11] The nearest-term swing factor is the 2026 federal pivot back toward transitional housing — potentially the first fresh tailwind for 624229 operators in over a decade, but one whose magnitude and timing are clouded by litigation, a newly competitive grant process that will cull weaker providers, and the ever-present risk of the policy pendulum swinging back.[2][18] Returns will be uneven because the sector is demand-rich but funding-constrained. The practical takeaway is unchanged: treat this as a grant- and donation-driven social industry with no public pure-plays, access it through the affordable-housing financing layer or philanthropy, and watch federal appropriations and HUD policy as the master variables.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau, "2022 NAICS Definition — 624229 Other Community Housing Services," 2022. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=624229&year=2022
2. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "HUD Overhauls Federal Homelessness Assistance" (HUD No. 26-038), 2026. https://www.hud.gov/news/hud-no-26-038
3. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "HUD Moving Forward on Bold Homelessness Reform" (HUD No. 26-031), 2026. https://www.hud.gov/news/hud-no-26-031
4. U.S. Census Bureau, "County Business Patterns, 2023 — NAICS 624229" (establishments, employment, annual and Q1 payroll), 2023. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
5. U.S. Census Bureau, "2022 Economic Census — Concentration by Largest Firms, NAICS 624229" (firms, receipts, CR4/CR8/CR20/CR50, HHI). https://data.census.gov/table/ECNSIZE2022.EC2200SIZECONCEN?codeset=naics~624229&y=2022
6. U.S. Small Business Administration, "Table of Small Business Size Standards (NAICS 624229)," effective March 17, 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
7. Habitat for Humanity International, "FY2024 Annual Report" and "Habitat for Humanity helped more than 3 million people…," 2024. https://www.habitat.org/multimedia/annual-report-2024/; https://www.habitat.org/newsroom/2024/habitat-humanity-helped-more-3-million-people-build-or-improve-place-call-home-during
8. Rebuilding Together, "About / Safe at Home Program" (affiliate network, volunteers, projects), 2024. https://rebuildingtogether.org/
9. SICCODE / commercial business database, "NAICS Code 624229 — Other Community Housing Services" (active-company and employment estimate), 2024. https://siccode.com/naics-code/624229/community-housing-services
10. Corporation for Supportive Housing, "Impact Investment," 2024. https://www.csh.org/impact-investment/
11. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "The 2024 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, Part 1: Point-in-Time Estimates," 2024. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2024-AHAR-Part-1.pdf
12. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, "Nonprofits Play Key Role in Repairing U.S. Homes," 2024. https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/blog/nonprofits-play-key-role-in-repairing-u-s-homes
13. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "HUD Announces Over $3.5 Billion to Help People Experiencing Homelessness" (FY2024 CoC awards), 2024. https://archives.hud.gov/news/2024/pr24-198.cfm
14. U.S. Administration for Children and Families, "LIHEAP Fact Sheet" (Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program funding), 2024–2026. https://acf.gov/ocs/fact-sheet/liheap-fact-sheet
15. U.S. Department of Energy, "Weatherization Assistance Program — How to Apply" (budget and average subsidy), 2026. https://www.energy.gov/cmei/scep/wap/how-apply-weatherization-assistance
16. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, "Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants (Section 504)," 2024. https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/single-family-housing-programs/single-family-housing-repair-loans-grants
17. Congressional Research Service, "The HUD Homeless Assistance Grants: Programs Authorized by the HEARTH Act" (RL33764). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL33764
18. National Association of Counties, "HUD issues FY 2026 Continuum of Care grant notice" and "As Litigation Delays New Funding, Congress Directs HUD to Renew Expired Continuum of Care Projects," 2026. https://www.naco.org/news/hud-issues-fy-2026-continuum-care-grant-notice; https://www.naco.org/news/hud-temporarily-shelves-continuum-care-changes-restores-prior-year-grant
19. Advantage Capital, "CRA & LIHTC Equity: Connecting Private Capital with Affordable Housing" (LIHTC market size and bank/CRA role), 2025. https://www.advantagecap.com/news/cra-lihtc-equity-affordable-housing-2025/
20. Urban Institute, "Denver Supportive Housing Social Impact Bond Initiative: Final Outcome Payments," 2021. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/denver-supportive-housing-social-impact-bond-initiative-final-outcome-payments
21. Internal Revenue Service, "Instructions for Form 8609: Low-Income Housing Credit," 2025. https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8609
22. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "Continuum of Care Program" and "HOME Investment Partnerships Program," 2026. https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/coc; https://www.hud.gov/hud-partners/community-affordable-housing-programs
23. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, "Fair Housing Rights and Obligations," 2026. https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/fair_housing_rights_and_obligations
24. Walker & Dunlop, "2025 Form 10-K" (affordable-housing lending and LIHTC syndication platform), SEC EDGAR, 2025. https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001497770&type=10-K
25. Arbor Realty Trust, "Affordable Housing," 2026. https://arbor.com/affordable-housing/
26. Blackstone, "Housing" / April Housing, 2026. https://www.blackstone.com/housing/
27. The Michaels Organization, "About Us," 2024. https://tmo.com/about-us/
28. Related Companies, "Affordable Housing," 2026. https://www.related.com/affordable-housing
29. Dominium, "What We Do," 2026. https://www.dominiumapartments.com/what-we-do.html
30. WinnCompanies, "Home," 2026. https://www.winncompanies.com/
31. Avanath Capital Management, "About Avanath," 2026. https://www.avanath.com/
32. Mercy Housing, "About," 2026. https://www.mercyhousing.org/about/
33. Volunteers of America National Services, "Our Work," 2026. https://www.voans.org/our-work/
34. National Church Residences, "Senior Living Communities," 2026. https://www.nationalchurchresidences.org/
35. Preservation of Affordable Housing, "What We Do," 2026. https://www.poah.org/what-we-do
36. National Community Renaissance (National CORE) / HavenCORE, "Who We Are," 2026. https://havencorecommunities.org/who-we-are/