HMO Medical Centers (U.S.) — NAICS 621491

1. Overview

A health maintenance organization (HMO) is a health plan that both insures its members and delivers their care through doctors and facilities the plan owns or tightly controls. An HMO medical center is the clinic side of that arrangement. Instead of paying doctors for each visit or procedure, an HMO is typically paid a fixed amount per member per month and then must keep those members healthy inside that budget. NAICS code 621491 (North American Industry Classification System) captures the establishments where that care physically happens — HMO-owned medical offices and outpatient centers, focused mainly on primary care. The archetype is Kaiser Permanente. [1][2]

This is one corner of a much larger structural shift in U.S. health care: the move from fee-for-service (get paid more for doing more) toward capitation and value-based care (get paid a fixed budget and profit by spending it wisely). The economics reward scale, disciplined medical-cost management, and accurate documentation of how sick patients are. Demand is durable; returns are not — they hinge on cost control, clinician productivity, reimbursement rates, and quality scores.

The sector is relevant to both public-market and private investors, but there is no pure listed "HMO medical center" stock. The category leader, Kaiser Permanente, is a nonprofit that issues bonds but no equity. Public-market investors get exposure indirectly, through diversified insurers that own clinics (UnitedHealth/Optum, CVS Health/Oak Street, Humana/CenterWell) and through smaller value-based-care providers. Private investors reach it through medical centers, physician groups, management services organizations, real estate, or credit. Several for-profit versions have been humbling investments — a caution that runs through this primer.

2. What it is and how it's structured

NAICS 621491 covers establishments with physicians and other clinical staff providing outpatient medical services to HMO subscribers, generally centered on primary care and owned by the HMO — including HMO establishments that both deliver care and underwrite the insurance. [1] This is the classic staff-model HMO (the plan employs the doctors) or group-model HMO (the plan exclusively contracts one dedicated physician group); members can generally use only those providers. Historic examples include Kaiser Permanente, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (absorbed by Kaiser in 2017), HealthPartners in Minnesota, and Geisinger Health Plan. [3]

Typical activities: primary and preventive care, chronic-disease management, routine outpatient services, referrals and care coordination, virtual and in-home support, and management of downstream utilization (specialist, hospital, laboratory, pharmacy).

What the code excludes matters as much as what it includes, because the exclusions are where most of the money now sits:

• Offices of Physicians — NAICS 621111. Independent or payer-owned practices that contract with multiple insurers (rather than being owned by a single HMO). Most modern value-based clinics — Optum's medical groups, CVS's Oak Street Health, Humana's CenterWell, ChenMed — are multi-payer and largely fall here, outside 621491.
• General Medical and Surgical Hospitals — NAICS 622110. An HMO-owned hospital is classified as a hospital. Kaiser's 50-plus hospitals sit here. [1]
• Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers — NAICS 524114. The underwriting/premium side of an HMO is classified as insurance, not as a medical center.
• All Other Outpatient Care Centers — NAICS 621498. Freestanding outpatient or urgent-care centers not owned by an HMO.

Ownership is unusual for a health-care category: it is dominated by large nonprofit integrated systems (Kaiser by far the largest), with a growing for-profit fringe of insurer-owned and investor-owned delivery arms. The supplied federal statistics do not provide a nonprofit/for-profit split. Legal ownership can also be complicated: state corporate-practice-of-medicine rules often require physicians to own the professional medical entity while an HMO or parent provides administration, technology, facilities, and contracting through a management services organization (MSO). [13][14]

3. How big it is

Federal statistics for NAICS 621491 (U.S.). These combine 2023 County Business Patterns with 2022 Economic Census data and should not be read as a single-year series.

This is an extraordinarily concentrated category: just 56 firms nationwide, with the top four accounting for roughly 89% of revenue and the top twenty for 100%. [5] The HHI — a standard revenue-concentration index where anything above 2,500 is deemed "highly concentrated" — sits at 2,449, at the very top of the "moderately concentrated" band. A handful of large integrated systems, Kaiser above all, define the industry. (Note: HHI here is industry-level revenue concentration, not a profit-margin or local-market measure.) The $44.5 million SBA (Small Business Administration) threshold is a federal-contracting definition of "small," not an estimate of a typical center's size.

The undercount caveat is large and important here. County Business Patterns counts only employer establishments with paid employees; it excludes non-employers, the self-employed, and most government workers. [6] But the bigger limitation is structural: the $43.6 billion receipts figure captures only the narrow slice coded to 621491. It badly understates the real weight of HMO-style, capitated, integrated care because (1) the insurance/premium side is coded as insurance (524114), (2) HMO-owned hospitals are coded as hospitals (622110), and (3) the physician groups that staff these systems are often independent professional partnerships coded as physician offices (621111). Kaiser Permanente alone reported about $100.8 billion in operating revenue and roughly 244,000 employees in 2023 — many times the entire NAICS 621491 category — precisely because Kaiser's insurance, hospitals, and Permanente physician groups sit in other codes. [2][8] Read 621491 as one accounting bucket for a much larger care model, not as the size of "the HMO industry."

4. The investable universe

A ticker signals market exposure, not that a company's operations fall inside NAICS 621491. There is no listed pure-play; the closest comparables are either giant diversified payers or small, volatile value-based-care companies. Figures below are the most recent reported.

The nonprofit leader (not investable as equity):

Public companies with owned or managed clinic delivery (indirect exposure):

Private / nonprofit owners closer to the model: Kaiser's own Permanente Medical Groups (physician partnerships); HealthPartners (nonprofit, consumer-governed plan-and-provider system) [23]; Sharp HealthCare / Sharp Health Plan (nonprofit San Diego system) [24]; Devoted Health (private Medicare-focused HMO with an in-house medical group) [25]; and ChenMed (private, physician-led senior-care operator — a key competitive benchmark, but generally adjacent to 621491 because it is physician-led rather than HMO-owned) [26].

The graveyard. Cano Health and CareMax, both once-public senior value-based-care companies, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2024 — a reminder that the for-profit version of this model can fail outright. [21][22]

5. How the money works

The defining economics are capitation and medical-cost management, not visit volume. The basic flow:

Premiums or government payments → HMO / plan → owned or affiliated provider → patient care and downstream services.

• Capitation and the medical loss ratio (MLR). An HMO or full-risk provider receives a fixed per-member-per-month (PMPM) payment. Profit is the spread between that premium and the cost of care delivered. The MLR — the share of premium spent on medical care — is the master gauge: keep it low enough (through prevention, coordination, and avoiding unnecessary hospital use) and there is margin; let it run high and you lose money on every member. Owners make money by managing utilization, not by billing more services. Beyond full capitation, providers may also earn through shared-risk arrangements, quality bonuses, administrative fees, and residual fee-for-service (FFS) payments.
• Risk adjustment. Medicare and Medicaid pay more for sicker patients, using a documented risk score. Accurately capturing a patient's conditions raises legitimate revenue — but aggressive "upcoding" invites clawbacks (see Regulation). This is the single most contested profit lever in the business.
• Thin operating margins, cushioned by investment income. Integrated systems run on razor-thin operating margins. Kaiser earned just $329 million of operating income on $100.8 billion of revenue in 2023 (about 0.3%); its reported net income swung to billions largely on investment returns. [8] The care operation is close to break-even by design; the balance sheet does much of the earning.
• Shared savings. In Medicare programs such as the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and ACO REACH, an accountable care organization (ACO) that beats a spending benchmark keeps part of the difference. Astrana's affiliated ACOs, for example, generated $120.4 million in gross shared savings in the 2024 performance year. [17]
• What to watch instead of clinic count. For an integrated parent, a center's economics rarely show up as a standalone clinic margin — intersegment and affiliated-provider arrangements make company-wide revenue incomparable with NAICS receipts. The useful operating metrics are membership/attributed lives, PMPM revenue and cost, medical-cost trend per member, mature-center panel growth, visits per clinician, risk-adjustment accuracy, downstream utilization, MLR, and medical margin (revenue after care costs, before corporate overhead). Clinic count alone is a weak measure — new centers can take years to reach an efficient panel size. Demand is relatively noncyclical; earnings are not.

6. What drives demand

• Medicare Advantage (MA). The core growth engine. MA is the private, capitated alternative to traditional Medicare; in 2025 it covered 34.1 million of ~62.8 million people with Medicare Parts A and B — about 54%. [27] Value-based clinics are purpose-built for this population, and the aging of the U.S. is a durable tailwind.
• Aging and chronic disease. Older patients need more primary care, medication management, and coordination — exactly what integrated centers that manage total cost of care are designed to deliver. Diabetes, heart disease, and similar conditions are where coordinated primary care most reduces costly hospitalizations, the model's core value proposition.
• Special Needs Plans (SNPs). MA plans for specific populations — including dual-eligibles (people qualifying for both Medicare and Medicaid) — raise demand for high-touch primary care and social support. [30]
• Reimbursement policy. CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) projected its 2026 policy changes would raise average MA payments to plans by about 5.06%, though the effect varies by plan, geography, risk profile, and quality. [29] Federal programs actively steer providers into risk-bearing arrangements.
• Access and convenience. Virtual visits, home-based care, retail locations, transportation, and extended hours help centers attract members and cut costly emergency use. [12][14][25]
• Employer and Medicaid coverage. Commercial HMOs, Medicaid managed care, and dual-eligible programs add demand beyond senior Medicare, but their economics lean more on state rates and employer purchasing.
• Geography. HMO-style care has always been strongest in California and the urban Northeast, where density and market history favor it. [31]

7. Regulation

HMO medical centers sit under overlapping federal and state oversight. Key regimes:

• HMO Act of 1973. The founding federal statute provided grants and loans to start and expand HMOs, overrode restrictive state laws for federally qualified plans, and required larger employers to offer an HMO option — seeding the modern industry. [32]
• State insurance regulation and ERISA. HMOs are licensed and supervised by state departments of insurance for solvency, network adequacy, and consumer protection. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) preempts state regulation of self-funded employer plans, a jurisdictional line that shapes what states can mandate. State corporate-practice-of-medicine and fee-splitting rules also govern whether a parent may employ physicians or must use an MSO. [33][13][14]
• CMS payment and quality rules. For any operator taking Medicare risk, CMS is the dominant regulator. Pressure points: annual MA payment rates; the CMS-HCC v28 risk-adjustment model now phasing in, which trims risk scores and squeezes coding-dependent operators; and Star quality ratings that gate bonus payments. [29]
• Medical loss ratio floor. MA organizations must report their MLR and generally maintain at least 85%; failure triggers remittances, enrollment freezes, and eventual contract termination. [34]
• RADV audits. CMS's Risk Adjustment Data Validation program verifies that submitted diagnoses are supported in the medical record and recoups overpayments. In 2025 CMS announced a sharp escalation — auditing essentially all MA contracts, reviewing far more records per plan, and scaling its coder workforce from about 40 to roughly 2,000 — while courts have limited its ability to extrapolate findings across a plan's whole population. This is a material, live financial risk to the sector. [39][40]
• Health-data law. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) governs protected health information held by plans and providers and their business associates. [35]
• Fraud and referral law. The federal Anti-Kickback Statute restricts payments meant to induce referrals in federal health programs; the physician self-referral law (the Stark Law) restricts certain Medicare referrals involving financial relationships. [37][36]
• Competition policy. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) review horizontal and vertical mergers, including insurer-provider combinations and acquisitions of local medical groups. [38]

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

The dominant theme is vertical integration: insurers buying the primary-care relationship. UnitedHealth's Optum is the largest payer-owned care platform; CVS acquired Oak Street Health; Humana built CenterWell. [11][14][13] The strategic logic is control of the medical dollar and of MA risk-adjustment data. Kaiser, meanwhile, consolidates on the nonprofit side, folding Geisinger and Cone Health into its new Risant Health platform. [9]

Competition is local even when ownership is national. Durable advantages include dense physician and facility networks, a trusted local brand, clinician recruiting and retention, accurate risk coding, favorable payer contracts, convenient access, and enough patient volume to fill clinician panels. The surrounding MA market is itself concentrated: in 2024, 89% of MA enrollees lived in highly or very highly concentrated county markets, and UnitedHealthcare or Humana was the largest insurer in more than half of all counties. [28]

Alongside strategics, private equity ran a roll-up wave in senior value-based care in the late 2010s and early 2020s. Much of it unwound painfully (see Risks and the graveyard above). [21]

Editorial judgment (forward-looking): consolidation is likely to continue, but selectively. The strongest platforms will combine adequate patient density, payer diversification, clinical quality, and cost control. Large center counts without mature panels or favorable risk contracts destroy value; the weak are being acquired or liquidated.

9. Key risks

1. Regulatory clawbacks and rate risk. RADV recoveries, the v28 model, and annual MA rate decisions can each erase a year's margin. Overly aggressive risk coding carries False Claims Act exposure. [39][29]
2. Medical-cost volatility. Full-risk operators eat cost overruns. The post-COVID surge in senior utilization in 2023–2024 hammered MA economics and helped push several providers under. [21]
3. Center-ramp and capital intensity. New sites carry rent, staffing, technology, and marketing costs before panels mature; staff-model systems carry heavy fixed costs. CVS's Oak Street resizing shows even large platforms may retrench. [14]
4. Clinician supply. Physicians, nurse practitioners, and care teams are the core input; wage inflation or turnover cuts access and margins.
5. Coding and compliance. Inaccurate diagnoses, referral arrangements, or quality reporting can trigger repayments, penalties, and litigation. [36][37]
6. Cybersecurity and privacy. Integrated systems hold vast protected health information and depend on complex technology networks. [35]
7. Concentration and bargaining power. A category dominated by a few systems — and local markets dominated by one or two payers — leaves little room for missteps and can pressure rates. Bankruptcies of Cano Health and CareMax and the near-total equity wipeout at P3 show how fast the model breaks when costs run hot. [19][22][28]
8. Antitrust and political scrutiny. Further insurer-provider consolidation may face delays, divestitures, or litigation, and prior authorization and care denials are under intense public and political pressure. [38]

10. How to invest and the outlook

Because the leader is a nonprofit, equity investors reach the model only indirectly. Separate three public exposures before comparing them:

• Direct integrated-care exposure — UnitedHealth (Optum), Humana (CenterWell), CVS Health (Oak Street). HMO/clinic operations are one segment inside a much larger enterprise, so the pure-play thesis is diluted.
• Payer exposure — Elevance, Centene, Molina, Cigna. A bet on premium growth and medical-cost trend more than on owned clinics.
• Risk-bearing provider exposure — agilon health, Astrana Health, Privia Health, P3 Health Partners. The closest bet on the capitated primary-care model, but small, volatile, and often poor performers. [16][17][18][19]
• Fixed income — Kaiser and other large nonprofit systems are active bond issuers, a lower-risk way to lend to the sector.

For any of these, share price, valuation multiples, and dividend yield should be judged against the medical-cost cycle and government-payment risk — not against clinic growth alone. Useful diligence: membership growth and payer mix; PMPM revenue and medical-cost trend; MA quality ratings and risk-adjustment performance; MLR and medical margin; mature-center panel growth; external vs. intersegment revenue; and clinic closures, capital spending, leases, and goodwill.

Private routes. Direct or fund exposure to physician-group joint ventures, provider-sponsored regional plans, MSOs, real estate, and PE-backed senior-care platforms. Diligence should center on capitation and risk-sharing terms, payer concentration and termination rights, panel ramp and retention, clinician ownership and compensation, MSO agreements and state corporate-practice rules, risk-adjustment controls, center-level break-even, and realistic exits to insurers or larger platforms. The 2024 bankruptcies are a reminder that these bets carry real capital risk.

Outlook (forward-looking judgment). Demand should stay favorable — aging, chronic disease, MA enrollment, and the policy push toward coordinated care are durable tailwinds. Near-term returns will remain uneven because reimbursement growth may not keep pace with medical costs and new centers need years and capital to mature. Watch the annual CMS MA rate notices, the v28 phase-in, the expanded RADV audits, and whether senior medical-cost trends normalize after the 2023–2024 spike. The structural direction — more capitation, more value-based care, more payer-owned primary care — looks durable; the open question is which operators can actually make the economics work. The strongest will be integrated, locally trusted, operationally disciplined, and diversified across payers; the weakest are those that mistake physical expansion for economic scale.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau, "621491: HMO Medical Centers — Census Bureau Profile / NAICS definition," 2022/2023. https://data.census.gov/profile/621491_-_HMO_medical_centers?g=010XX00US
2. Kaiser Permanente, "Fast Facts," 2025. https://about.kaiserpermanente.org/who-we-are/fast-facts
3. Managed Care Magazine, "Staff-Model HMOs: Don't Blink or You'll Miss Them!," 1999. https://www.managedcaremag.com/archives/9907/9907.staffmodel.html
4. U.S. Census Bureau, "County Business Patterns: 2023 (CB2300CBP, NAICS 621491)," 2023. https://data.census.gov/table/CBP2023.CB2300CBP
5. U.S. Census Bureau, "2022 Economic Census — Concentration of Largest Firms for the U.S. (NAICS 621491)," 2022. https://data.census.gov/table/ECNSIZE2022
6. U.S. Census Bureau, "County Business Patterns Methodology," 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/technical-documentation/methodology.html
7. U.S. Small Business Administration, "Table of Size Standards (NAICS 621491)," 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
8. Fierce Healthcare, "Kaiser Permanente reports $4.1B profit, exceeds $100B operating revenues in 2023," 2024. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/providers/kaiser-permanente-reports-41b-profit-exceeds-100b-operating-revenues-2023
9. Kaiser Permanente, "Kaiser Permanente and Risant Health Report 2025 Financial Results," 2026. https://about.kaiserpermanente.org/news/press-release-archive/kaiser-permanente-risant-health-report-2025-financial-results
10. Fierce Healthcare, "Kaiser Permanente clears $115B revenue in 2024 thanks to Risant Health additions," 2025. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/providers/kaiser-permanente-clears-115b-revenue-2024-risant-health-additions
11. Medical Economics, "Optum, other health insurers are gaining more and more control of primary care across the country," 2024. https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/optum-other-health-insurers-are-gaining-more-and-more-control-of-primary-care-across-the-country-study
12. UnitedHealth Group, "2025 Form 10-K," 2026 (SEC EDGAR). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/731766/000073176626000062/unh-20251231.htm
13. Humana, "2025 Form 10-K," 2026 (SEC EDGAR). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/49071/000004907126000009/hum-20251231.htm
14. CVS Health, "2025 Form 10-K," 2026 (SEC EDGAR). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/64803/000006480326000010/cvs-20251231.htm
15. Forbes (Bruce Japsen), "CVS Rolls Out New Format With Senior Clinics Alongside Pharmacies," 2024. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2024/08/01/cvs-rolls-out-new-format-with-senior-clinics-alongside-pharmacies/
16. Business Wire, "agilon health Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2024 Results," 2025. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250225385641/en/agilon-health-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-Fiscal-2024-Results
17. PR Newswire / Astrana Health, "Astrana Health ACOs Deliver $120.4 Million in Gross Shared Savings in 2024 Performance Year," 2025 (and Astrana 2025 Form 10-K, SEC EDGAR). https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/astrana-health-acos-deliver-120-4-million-in-gross-shared-savings-in-2024-performance-year-302823517.html
18. Privia Health, "2025 Form 10-K / company overview," 2026 (SEC EDGAR). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1759655/000175965526000010/prva-20251231.htm
19. Macrotrends, "P3 Health Partners (PIII) Market Cap," 2025. https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/PIII/p3-health-partners/market-cap
20. Elevance Health, Centene, Molina Healthcare, and The Cigna Group, "2025 Forms 10-K," 2026 (SEC EDGAR).
21. Private Equity Stakeholder Project (Mary Bugbee), "Private Equity's Failed Bet on Value-Based Care," 2025. https://pestakeholder.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PESP_Report_Healthcare_May2025.pdf
22. Becker's Hospital Review, "15 healthcare bankruptcies in 2024," 2024. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/15-healthcare-bankruptcies-in-2024/
23. HealthPartners, "About HealthPartners," 2026. https://www.healthpartners.com/about/
24. Sharp HealthCare, "About Sharp," 2026. https://www.sharp.com/about
25. Devoted Health, "About Devoted Medical," 2026. https://www.devoted.com/medical/about-devoted-medical/
26. ChenMed, "About Us," 2026. https://www.chenmed.com/about-us
27. Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), "A Snapshot of Sources of Coverage Among Medicare Beneficiaries," 2025. https://www.kff.org/medicare/a-snapshot-of-sources-of-coverage-among-medicare-beneficiaries/
28. Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), "Most Medicare Advantage Markets Are Dominated by One or Two Insurers," 2025. https://www.kff.org/medicare/most-medicare-advantage-markets-are-dominated-by-one-or-two-insurers/
29. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "2026 Medicare Advantage and Part D Rate Announcement," 2025. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/2026-medicare-advantage-part-d-rate-announcement
30. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "Special Needs Plans (SNP)," 2025. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/enrollment-renewal/health-plans/special-needs-plans
31. Managed Healthcare Executive, "Top 20 states by HMO enrollment," 2023. https://www.managedhealthcareexecutive.com/view/top-20-states-hmo-enrollment-0
32. Wikipedia, "Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973," 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Maintenance_Organization_Act_of_1973
33. Congressional Research Service (via EveryCRSReport), "Managed Health Care: Federal and State Regulation," 1997. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/97-938.html
34. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "Medical Loss Ratio," 2025. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/health-drug-plans/medical-loss-ratio
35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Covered Entities and Business Associates (HIPAA)," 2024. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/covered-entities/index.html
36. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "Physician Self-Referral (Stark Law)," 2025. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/physician-self-referral
37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, "Fraud & Abuse Laws," 2025. https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/physician-education/fraud-abuse-laws/
38. Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice, "2023 Merger Guidelines," 2023. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/12/federal-trade-commission-justice-department-release-2023-merger-guidelines
39. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "CMS Rolls Out Aggressive Strategy to Enhance and Accelerate Medicare Advantage Audits," 2025. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-rolls-out-aggressive-strategy-enhance-accelerate-medicare-advantage-audits
40. Ropes & Gray LLP, "CMS Announces Significant Changes to RADV Auditing Efforts," 2025. https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/05/cms-announces-significant-changes-to-radv-auditing-efforts-considerations-and-next-steps