Space Research and Technology (U.S.) — NAICS 927110

A Histometrics industry primer for public-market and private investors.

1. Overview

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the U.S. federal standard for sorting business establishments into industries. Code 927110 — "Space Research and Technology" is one of its more unusual entries: it does not describe a commercial market. It sits inside Sector 92, "Public Administration," and covers government establishments that administer and operate space flights, space research, space exploration, and government space-flight centers.[1] In plain terms it is the government-function core of the U.S. space effort — chiefly the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and its federally operated field centers — not the private companies that build rockets and satellites.

That distinction is the single most important thing to grasp. Nothing is "listed" or sold under 927110; it is a taxpayer-funded public activity. What you can invest in, supply, or compete with is the large commercial ecosystem around it — defense/aerospace primes, launch companies, satellite operators, and Earth-observation and data firms — all classified under other NAICS codes (Section 2). Federal demand provides the foundation; commercial returns depend on reliability, launch cadence, reusable hardware, recurring services, and capital discipline.

Two access paths run through this primer:

• Public-market route: diversified defense/space primes, plus a maturing set of launch, satellite, lunar, and data pure-plays (Sections 4 and 10).
• Private route: venture and growth equity in launch, station, and in-space infrastructure companies (SpaceX historically, Blue Origin, Firefly, Sierra Space, Axiom, Vast, and peers), plus pre-IPO secondaries (Sections 4 and 10).

2. What it is, and what it excludes

In scope (927110): federal government establishments primarily engaged in the administration and operation of space flights, space research, and space exploration, including government-operated space-flight centers.[1] Think NASA headquarters and its field centers — Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Goddard, Johnson, Kennedy, Marshall, and others. The "output" is a public service funded by Congress, not a product sold for profit, so the code is government-dominated by definition.

Explicitly excluded — and this is where nearly all the investable money actually sits:

• NAICS 336414 — Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing: the firms that actually build rockets, launch vehicles, and spacecraft, including prototypes.[1][4]
• NAICS 336415 — Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion Unit and Parts Manufacturing: rocket engines and propulsion parts.[1][4]
• NAICS 541715 — Research and Development (R&D) in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences: private space-vehicle and propulsion R&D, except prototype production.[1][4]
• NAICS 517410 — Satellite Telecommunications: operators delivering communications and broadband via satellite.[1]

Commercial/nonscheduled space transportation carriers, and satellite and communications equipment manufacturing, also fall outside 927110 — classified in transportation and electronics-manufacturing codes rather than in Public Administration.[1] The practical point: the broader "space economy" spans manufacturing, information services, professional services, communications, research, construction, and government, which is why the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) measures space activity across many industries rather than treating 927110 as the whole market.[5]

Ownership mix. The code itself is 100% government. The surrounding ecosystem is a mix of (a) large publicly traded defense/aerospace primes, (b) a wave of newer publicly traded "pure-play" space companies, and (c) very large privately held companies — most importantly SpaceX and Blue Origin — that have historically dwarfed the public pure-plays. A company's "space revenue" is therefore usually an adjacent exposure, not revenue classified under 927110.

3. How big it is (and why federal business statistics don't show it)

There are no Census business statistics for NAICS 927110. The Economic Census, County Business Patterns, and the Statistics of U.S. Businesses program all exclude Sector 92 (Public Administration) and government-owned establishments by design.[2][3] So there is no official establishment count, payroll figure, or receipts total for this code — not because the activity is small, but because federal business surveys don't cover government functions. Our ingested federal-statistics file likewise contains no metric for 927110, consistent with that exclusion; where a value would normally appear, we say so rather than invent one. (Commercial marketing databases list only a handful of "companies" under 927110, which merely reflects that it is a government code, not a measure of the industry's size.)

To size the activity you have to look elsewhere — the government core, and BEA's cross-industry space account.

The government core. NASA's enacted budget for fiscal year (FY) 2026 is about $24.4 billion, roughly flat with FY2025; the White House had sought a deep (~24%) cut, which Congress largely rejected.[8][9] NASA's FY2027 request details the program mix, including about $8.51 billion for Moon and Mars transportation and systems, of which about $744 million is for commercial Moon/Mars infrastructure and transportation.[10] NASA's civil-service workforce ran near 16,000–17,000 heading into FY2025 but fell by roughly 4,000 people during 2025 through voluntary-departure programs — an unusually sharp contraction.[14] On the national-security side, the U.S. Space Force's FY2026 discretionary funding was about $26.1 billion, rising above $40 billion once reconciliation money is added.[12][13] Its FY2027 request (not enacted) breaks out roughly $6.7 billion for satellite communications, $6.8 billion for missile warning and tracking, $21.6 billion for Space Control systems, and $2.9 billion for national-security launches (about 22 launches).[11] The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) add further government demand.

The whole space economy (BEA). BEA's Space Economy Satellite Account measures space activity across all the relevant private and government codes. Its March 2025 estimates put the U.S. space economy at:

For scale on the commercial-launch side, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) counted 195 licensed launches (204 launches plus reentries) in FY2025.[15] An earlier BEA cut split 2022 output into roughly $126 billion private and $70 billion government, underscoring how large the government share of this specific activity is.[6] BEA cautions that its government-employment coverage is incomplete (it excludes classified intelligence employment) and has said the space-economy statistics will no longer be produced on a regular schedule.[5][7] For a purely commercial read, the Satellite Industry Association (SIA) reported the global commercial satellite business at about $293 billion in 2024, with satellite services near $108 billion and satellite manufacturing about $20 billion (U.S. firms ~69% of manufacturing revenue).[23]

The undercount, restated. NAICS 927110 captures only the government slice, and standard business statistics don't even publish that. The real footprint of "space" is spread across manufacturing, R&D, telecom, and data codes, and small operators are often classified by their primary activity rather than their space application. Judge the industry by the BEA space-economy account and agency budgets, never by this one code's business count.

4. The investable universe

There is no way to invest in NAICS 927110 directly — it is a government activity. Investors access the theme through three groups. Figures are approximate scale markers (not quotes) and move constantly.

Diversified defense/aerospace primes (large, profitable; space is one segment among many):

Publicly traded space pure-plays (higher growth, mostly still pre-profit):

Rocket Lab illustrates pure-play economics: 2025 revenue of ~$601.8M across 21 launch missions, with backlog rising from ~$1.85B at year-end 2025 toward ~$2.2B in Q1 2026. Those are company figures, not industry totals, and backlog is not profit or cash flow.[30][31]

Large private owners (historically the biggest players of all):

• SpaceX — dominant in launch (reusable Falcon 9/Heavy, Starship; Dragon crew and cargo) and satellite broadband (Starlink). Starlink revenue reached about $11.4 billion in 2025 (up ~48%, ~61% of company revenue), with 10M+ customers by early 2026.[24][40] A late-2025 secondary sale valued the company near $800 billion.[24] In 2026 SpaceX moved toward public markets: it filed an S-1 registration statement and, per secondary reporting, an IPO at a valuation in roughly the $2 trillion range under the ticker SPCX — the first public listing of a major launch company.[25][26] These SpaceX valuation and IPO figures rest on aggregator/secondary sources, not audited filings; treat them as reported estimates. SpaceX is covered here because for most of the period this primer describes it was the defining private player.
• Blue Origin (Jeff Bezos) — New Glenn orbital rocket, New Shepard suborbital, BE-4 engines, Blue Moon lunar lander; privately funded.[41]
• Sierra Space — Dream Chaser spaceplane, satellite systems, commercial-station technology.[42]
• Axiom Space — private astronaut missions, spacesuits, Axiom Station.[43]
• Vast — Haven commercial space stations.[44]
• United Launch Alliance (ULA) — a 50/50 joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin (Vulcan/Atlas launch vehicles).[45]
• Plus other venture/growth-funded launchers and suppliers (Relativity, Stoke Space, and others).

5. How the money works

Two very different economic engines run here.

The government core (927110) doesn't earn a profit. It is funded by annual congressional appropriations and measured by what it spends — compensation and R&D — not by revenue or margin.[5] For investors it matters as a customer and demand source, not a business to own. Its "unit economics" are political: appropriations levels, program starts and cancellations, and multi-year commitments (Artemis, the International Space Station (ISS) and its successors, national-security constellations).

The commercial ecosystem monetizes across several distinct revenue pools:

Key mechanics that distinguish winners:

• Contract type is everything. Legacy programs run on cost-plus contracts (government reimburses cost plus a fee — low risk, low margin, slow). The newer model is firm-fixed-price / milestone-based service contracts (set payments for hitting milestones — higher risk, but rewards efficiency and lets the contractor keep the upside). NASA's commercial-crew, Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS), and future lunar-transport competitions, plus Space Force launch buys, use this model; NASA's FY2027 request explicitly frames future commercial Moon/Mars transport as fixed-price and milestone-based, which improves customer cost control but shifts development risk onto suppliers.[10] Margin and cash-flow quality depend heavily on the mix.
• Backlog is the leading indicator. Because contracts are lumpy and long-dated, investors watch funded backlog (signed, funded, unfulfilled orders — not merely announced awards) and the book-to-bill ratio more than any single quarter. Rocket Lab's move from ~$1.85B to ~$2.2B backlog is the kind of signal markets react to.[30][31]
• Launch economics = cadence × price-per-kilogram, driven by reusability. Profitability is a function of how often a company flies and its cost to put a kilogram into orbit. Reusable boosters (SpaceX's core advantage) collapse marginal cost and let a provider undercut rivals while still earning margin — which is why launch price is the pivot of the whole industry's cost structure.
• Recurring services beat one-off hardware. The most durable models sell subscriptions and data: Starlink broadband (per-user monthly fees), Earth-observation imagery (Planet), and hosted/managed satellite capacity. These carry higher gross margins and predictable revenue once the up-front constellation is built.
• Cash burn and dilution define the pure-plays. Most listed pure-plays are not yet profitable; they fund constellation build-out and R&D by burning cash and raising capital (equity or convertible debt). Runway, burn rate, and share dilution matter as much as revenue growth — AST SpaceMobile's revenue leapt from a few million to ~$71M in a year but is still funded through large capital raises.[36] The central tension across every pool is high up-front capital versus uncertain utilization: vehicles need frequent missions, satellites need enough customers, stations need payloads and crew, data firms need repeat customers. Scale spreads fixed costs, but only after technical reliability is proven.

6. What drives demand

• Federal budgets — the biggest single driver. NASA (~$24B), the Space Force (~$26B+, over $40B with reconciliation), the NRO, and NOAA set the baseline of contract dollars.[8][11][12] Program decisions — funding or killing systems like the Space Launch System (SLS), Orion, Gateway, or ISS successors — swing whole company order books.
• Great-power competition. Rivalry with China (and Russia) is pushing national-security spending toward missile warning/tracking, resilient constellations, space control, and large missile-defense initiatives — a persistent tailwind for the primes and defense-facing pure-plays.[11]
• Satellite constellations. More than 68% of FAA-licensed launches in FY2025 involved constellation deployment[15] — the mega-constellation build-out (Starlink, Amazon Leo/Kuiper) is now a dominant source of launch and manufacturing demand.
• Broadband and direct-to-device connectivity. Satellite internet, multi-orbit networks, and cellular-to-satellite ("direct-to-phone") services are expanding use cases, even as legacy direct-to-home satellite TV declines.[5][36][39]
• Earth observation, weather, and positioning. Imagery, weather data, navigation, and timing support agriculture, logistics, defense, disaster response, and financial infrastructure.[5][38]
• Falling launch cost and rising cadence. Cheaper access to orbit is itself a demand driver — it makes previously uneconomic businesses (mega-constellations, on-orbit servicing, in-space manufacturing) viable. The FAA projects 209–214 commercial space operations in FY2026, with a high-case scenario of 507 by 2036 (forecasts, not guarantees).[15]
• Exploration and commercial stations. Artemis (return to the Moon) and eventual Mars ambitions pull through lunar landers, heavy-lift launch, and services contracts; Axiom and Vast are developing commercial destinations for research, manufacturing, and private-astronaut missions — long-dated optionality rather than an established recurring market.[10][43][44]

The strongest near-term demand is where space is already a critical service — defense, communications, navigation, weather, and data. Deep-space exploration and settlement remain valuable optionality but carry far greater technical and financial uncertainty.

7. Regulation

The government core (927110) is the regulator's employer; the commercial ecosystem faces a layered licensing regime:

• FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST): licenses commercial launches, reentries, and spaceports. Since March 2026, Part 450 (14 CFR Part 450) has been the exclusive, mandatory, performance-based licensing framework, with operators (SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, ULA, Firefly) moving legacy licenses onto it. It broadens licensing but does not remove safety, environmental, insurance, or airspace requirements; launches conducted for the federal government are treated differently.[15][16][17]
• FCC (Federal Communications Commission) Space Bureau: authorizes satellite spectrum and earth stations (Part 25) and enforces orbital-debris rules, including a five-year post-mission disposal standard for many low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites.[18]
• NOAA Office of Space Commerce: licenses commercial remote-sensing (Earth-imaging) satellites (15 CFR Part 960) and is standing up civil space-traffic coordination for an increasingly crowded orbital environment.[19]
• Export controls: the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (State Department, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (Commerce Department, Bureau of Industry and Security) restrict hardware, software, technical data, foreign-person access, and spacecraft transfers.[20][21]
• Deregulation push: Executive Order 14335 (August 2025) directs agencies to streamline launch licensing and environmental reviews to raise cadence — a policy tailwind whose durability depends on the administration.[22]

Regulation can be a competitive moat for licensed incumbents, but approval delays, environmental reviews, export restrictions, and orbital-debris compliance can also delay revenue and raise capital needs.

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

• SpaceX sets the price. Reusability gives SpaceX a structural cost advantage that dominates launch, and its Starlink unit dominates LEO broadband. Scale is concentrated: in FY2025, SpaceX conducted 161 of 195 FAA-licensed launches (83%), versus Rocket Lab 15, Blue Origin 10, ULA 4, Stratolaunch 4, and Firefly 1.[15] Every rival — ULA's Vulcan, Blue Origin's New Glenn, Rocket Lab's forthcoming Neutron — is effectively pricing against SpaceX.
• The primes consolidate and defend. Lockheed, Northrop, Boeing, and L3Harris hold the deep national-security and human-spaceflight franchises (satellites, Orion, missile warning) but grow slowly; Northrop's 2024 space sales actually dipped after a classified program was cancelled.[28]
• The pure-play shakeout. The 2020–2021 wave of companies that went public via special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) is sorting into winners compounding revenue and backlog (Rocket Lab, AST SpaceMobile) and stragglers still short of scale.[33]
• Active consolidation. Northrop Grumman acquired Orbital ATK (2018)[28]; Redwire acquired Edge Autonomy and expanded its microgravity/defense portfolio (2025)[32]; Rocket Lab acquired GEOST, adding space-domain-awareness (2025)[30]; Voyager agreed to acquire Astrobotic (2026)[46]. Consolidation is likely to continue in components, ground systems, launch support, and mission data as technical and capital requirements rise — though integration risk and contract losses can destroy value quickly.
• New entrants and vertical integration. Amazon's Leo/Kuiper is entering satellite broadband, and a cohort of well-funded private launchers is chasing the medium-lift market. Owning launch + satellites + services (SpaceX's model) is the strategic trend.

9. Risks

• Appropriations and program risk. Because government is such a large customer, budget cuts or program cancellations hit order books directly. The White House proposed a ~24% NASA cut for FY2026 (and further reductions for FY2027); Congress has pushed back, but the fights are recurring and unpredictable.[8][9]
• Customer concentration. Many pure-plays lean heavily on NASA and the Department of Defense (DoD); a lost contract can be material (as Northrop's cancelled program showed).[28]
• Cash burn and dilution. Pre-profit companies depend on continued capital access; a risk-off market or a missed milestone can force dilutive raises.[36]
• Valuation. Several pure-plays trade at very high multiples of sales, leaving little room for execution stumbles; public markets may capitalize distant commercial potential before recurring revenue or positive cash flow exists.[30]
• Single-provider dependence. The ecosystem's reliance on SpaceX for affordable launch is a concentration risk for customers and competitors alike.[15]
• Execution and physical risk. Launch failures, spacecraft defects, reentry problems, and schedule slips (Neutron, Starship, New Glenn) are inherent.
• Supply chain. Shortages of propulsion, electronics, sensors, specialty materials, and radiation-hardened components can stall programs.
• Orbital congestion and debris. More satellites raise collision and regulatory risk; space-traffic rules are still being built.[18][19]
• Geopolitical/export exposure. ITAR/EAR and shifting policy can constrain markets and partnerships.[20][21]

Company filings emphasize these same risks — technical execution, contract performance, capital needs, customer concentration, and regulatory compliance.[29][32][33][34][36]

10. How to invest, and the outlook

Public-market routes:

• Diversified, lower-risk: the primes (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, L3Harris) give space exposure inside profitable, dividend-paying defense businesses — but dilute the effect of pure space growth.[27][28]
• Satellite & data operators: more recurring-revenue character (Viasat, Planet Labs, AST SpaceMobile) but still capital-intensive.[36][38][39]
• Pure-play launch/lunar/infrastructure growth: Rocket Lab, Intuitive Machines, Redwire, Firefly, Voyager — higher upside, higher volatility, greater dilution and execution risk, mostly pre-profit.[30][31][32][33][34][35]
• Diversified parents for indirect exposure: Amazon (Amazon Leo) and the Boeing/Lockheed-owned ULA give indirect access to private programs.[40][45]
• SpaceX (SPCX): reported public after its 2026 IPO — the largest and most-watched name, at a valuation that prices in enormous future growth (and whose figures rest on secondary reporting).[25][26]
• Funds: thematic exchange-traded funds (ETFs) — space/aerospace baskets — offer one-ticket diversification for investors who don't want single-name risk.

Private routes:

• Venture and growth equity in Blue Origin, Sierra Space, Axiom, Vast, Stoke, Relativity and peers — usually via specialist space/deep-tech funds.[41][42][43][44]
• Pre-IPO secondaries in late-stage names, for accredited/institutional investors, with the usual illiquidity and pricing-opacity caveats. Diligence should focus on the cap table, liquidation preferences, follow-on funding needs, launch manifest, technical milestones, anchor customer contracts, insurance, export-control constraints, and the path from lumpy project revenue to repeatable recurring revenue.

What to track (both audiences): funded backlog (not merely announced awards), launch cadence and success rate, cost per launch, satellite deployment and capacity utilization, customer conversion, gross margin, cash burn and capital expenditure, and regulatory milestones.

Near-term drivers (forward-looking, not guarantees): the aftermarket for the SpaceX listing and any read-through to peer valuations; the pace of Artemis and lunar-services awards; large new missile-defense ("Golden Dome"-type) spending flowing to primes and constellation builders; the LEO broadband race (Starlink vs. Amazon Leo/Kuiper); first flights and maturation of Neutron, New Glenn, and Starship; and the annual NASA/Space Force appropriations cycle, which remains the swing factor.

Bottom line: NAICS 927110 names a government function you can't buy, and federal business statistics don't even measure it. The investable story lives in the codes next door — manufacturing, R&D, satellite services, and data — where a maturing set of public pure-plays and a newly listed SpaceX now sit alongside the established primes. Falling launch costs and sustained government demand are real tailwinds; budget politics, customer and single-provider concentration, cash burn, and rich valuations are the offsetting risks. The enduring distinction is between impressive technology and a durable business that converts missions into repeatable, cash-generating operations.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau. "2022 NAICS — 927110 Space Research and Technology" (definition and cross-references), 2022 NAICS Manual. https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=927110&year=2022&details=927110
2. U.S. Census Bureau. "County Business Patterns — FAQs (industries excluded, including Sector 92)." https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/about/faqs.html
3. U.S. Census Bureau. "Economic Census — Understanding NAICS (government establishments excluded)." 2022. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census/year/2022/guidance/understanding-naics.html
4. NAICS Association. "336414 Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing (and related 336415 / 541715 exclusions)." https://www.naics.com/naics-code-description/?code=336414
5. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. "New and Revised Statistics for the U.S. Space Economy, 2012–2023." Survey of Current Business, March 2025. https://apps.bea.gov/scb/issues/2025/03-march/0325-space-economy.htm
6. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. "New and Revised Statistics for the U.S. Space Economy, 2017–2022." Survey of Current Business, June 2024. https://apps.bea.gov/scb/issues/2024/06-june/0624-space-economy.htm
7. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. "Space Economy" (data special topics; discontinuation note). 2026. https://www.bea.gov/data/special-topics/space-economy
8. NASA. "FY 2026 Budget Request." 2025. https://www.nasa.gov/fy-2026-budget-request/
9. SpacePolicyOnline. "Great News for NASA in the House-Senate FY2026 Appropriations Report." 2026. https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/great-news-for-nasa-in-the-house-senate-fy2026-appropriations-report/
10. NASA. "Fiscal Year 2027 Budget Request." 2026. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/fiscal-year-2027-full-budget-request.pdf
11. U.S. Space Force. "Budget Request Directs Record Funding to Air Force and Space Force" (FY2027 request detail). 2026. https://www.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4465543/
12. SpacePolicyOnline. "Adding Reconciliation, Space Force Budget Tops $40 Billion in FY2026." 2026. https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/adding-reconciliation-space-force-budget-tops-40-billion-in-fy2026/
13. Congressional Research Service. "Defense Primer: U.S. Space Force" (IF12610). 2026. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12610
14. FedTools. "NASA Lost ~4,000 Civil Servants in 2025: Workforce Guide." 2026. https://www.fedtools.com/blog/nasa-workforce-reduction-2026
15. Federal Aviation Administration. "Aerospace Forecast, Fiscal Years 2026–2046" (licensed-launch counts, forecasts). 2026. https://www.faa.gov/data_research/aviation/aerospace_forecasts/FY_2026-2046_Full_Forecast_Document_Tables.pdf
16. Federal Aviation Administration. "FAA Streamlines Commercial Space License Approvals" / Part 450 guidance. 2026. https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/faa-streamlines-commercial-space-license-approvals
17. Congressional Research Service. "Commercial Space Launch and Reentry Regulations: Overview and Select Issues" (R48582). 2025. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48582
18. Federal Communications Commission. "Second Report and Order on Orbital Debris Mitigation (five-year disposal rule)" (FCC 22-74). 2022. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-22-74A1_Rcd.pdf
19. NOAA Office of Space Commerce. "Navigating U.S. Commercial Space Regulations" (remote sensing, 15 CFR Part 960; space-traffic coordination). 2025. https://space.commerce.gov/links/resources-for-space-entrepreneurs/navigating-u-s-commercial-space-regulations/
20. U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. "International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)." 2024. https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/
21. U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security. "Export Administration Regulations (EAR)." 2026. https://www.bis.gov/regulations/ear
22. Greenberg Traurig LLP. "Executive Order Aims to Accelerate Commercial Space Development Through Deregulation" (EO 14335). 2025. https://www.gtlaw.com/en/insights/2025/10/executive-order-aims-to-accelerate-commercial-space-development-through-deregulation
23. Satellite Industry Association. "State of the Satellite Industry Report (28th Annual)." 2025. https://sia.org/state-of-the-satellite-industry-report/
24. Sacra. "SpaceX — revenue, valuation & funding." 2026. https://sacra.com/c/spacex/
25. Morningstar. "6 Charts on SpaceX's S-1 Financials." 2026. https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/6-charts-spacexs-s-1-financials
26. ValueAdd VC. "SpaceX IPO / SPCX — S-1 breakdown and valuation." 2026. https://valueaddvc.com/spacex-ipo
27. Via Satellite. "Lockheed Martin Space Sales Grew 4% in 2025" (space segment sales); Lockheed Martin 2025 Form 10-K. 2026. https://www.satellitetoday.com/finance/2026/01/29/lockheed-martin-space-sales-grew-4-in-2025/
28. Via Satellite. "Northrop Grumman Space Segment Ends Streak of Growth in 2024"; Northrop Grumman Form 10-K (Orbital ATK acquisition, 2018). 2025. https://www.satellitetoday.com/finance/2025/01/30/northrop-grumman-space-segment-ends-streak-of-growth-in-2024/
29. The Boeing Company. Form 10-K (Defense, Space & Security segment). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12927/000162828026004357/ba-20251231.htm
30. Rocket Lab. Form 10-K, FY2025 (revenue $601.8M, 21 launch missions, backlog $1.85B, GEOST acquisition). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819994/000181999426000013/rklb-20251231.htm
31. The Next Web / StockTitan. "Rocket Lab Q1 2026 revenue and backlog ($2.2B); record 2025 results." 2026. https://thenextweb.com/news/rocket-labs-revenue-grew-64-per-cent-its-backlog-hit-2-2-billion-dollars
32. Redwire Corp. Form 10-K, FY2025 (Edge Autonomy acquisition). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1819810/000181981026000029/rdw-20251231.htm
33. Intuitive Machines. Form 10-K, FY2025 (lunar transport, backlog). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1844452/000162828026019865/lunr-20251231.htm
34. Voyager Technologies. Form 10-K, FY2025 (Starlab, defense/space). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1788060/000162828026016543/voyg-20251231.htm
35. Firefly Aerospace. Form 10-K, FY2025 (launch, lunar landers; 2025 IPO). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1860160/000119312526116309/fly-20251231.htm
36. AST SpaceMobile. Form 10-K, FY2025 (direct-to-device, capital needs). 2026. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1780312/000178031226000006/asts-20251231.htm
37. Zacks / Yahoo Finance. "Investment ideas: Rocket Lab, AST SpaceMobile, Intuitive Machines, Planet Labs (2026 guidance)." 2026. https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/zacks-investment-ideas-feature-highlights-104300441.html
38. Planet Labs PBC. Form 10-K (Earth-observation imagery & data). 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1836833/000183683325000050/pl-20250131.htm
39. Viasat Inc. Form 10-K (multi-orbit satellite communications). 2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/797721/000095017025077138/vsat-20250331.htm
40. SpaceX. "Mission: Starlink and Space Transportation"; Amazon "Amazon Leo" (formerly Project Kuiper). 2026. https://www.spacex.com/mission/starlink/
41. Blue Origin. "New Glenn." 2026. https://www.blueorigin.com/new-glenn
42. Sierra Space. "Spaceflight Hardware Product Catalog." 2024. https://www.sierraspace.com/
43. Axiom Space. "Company Overview." 2026. https://www.axiomspace.com/
44. Vast. "Company and Station Overview." 2026. https://www.vastspace.com/
45. United Launch Alliance. "Vulcan User Guide." 2023. https://www.ulalaunch.com/
46. Voyager Technologies. "Agreement to Acquire Astrobotic Technology" (2026). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1788060/000162828026040850/voyg-20260601.htm
47. CompaniesMarketCap / MacroTrends. "Market capitalizations — Rocket Lab (RKLB), AST SpaceMobile (ASTS), Intuitive Machines (LUNR), Planet Labs (PL)." 2026. https://companiesmarketcap.com/