Convention and Visitors Bureaus (U.S.) — Industry Primer

NAICS 2022 code 561591. A Histometrics industry primer for public- and private-market investors.

---

1. Overview

A convention and visitors bureau (CVB) — increasingly called a destination marketing organization or destination management organization (DMO) — is the local body that markets a city, county, or region to travelers and to the meeting planners who book conventions. When "Visit Denver," "Choose Chicago," "NYC Tourism + Conventions," or the "Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority" advertise a destination, staff a visitor center, or bid to host a medical convention, that is this industry at work [1].

The single most important thing to understand up front: this is almost entirely a non-profit and government activity, not a for-profit one. The typical CVB is a non-profit business league funded by a tax that visitors pay on hotel rooms, and its job is to generate economic activity for other businesses — hotels, restaurants, airlines, attractions — not to earn a profit for owners. There is no publicly traded "convention bureau" company, and a CVB is essentially never an acquisition target, because public authorities and non-profits do not distribute profits to shareholders.

So why would an investor care? Because CVBs sit at the control point of a very large cash flow — Americans and foreign visitors spent roughly $1.3 trillion traveling in the United States in 2024 [2] — and the lodging taxes that fund them are a direct, leveraged read on hotel demand in a given market. That creates two real ways in:

• Public equities in the travel, lodging, and events ecosystem that CVBs feed (indirect proxies).
• Private and fixed-income exposure — most directly, the municipal bonds backed by the same hotel-tax streams that fund the bureaus, plus private ownership of convention hotels, venues, and event technology.

Both are covered below. Throughout, the CVB itself is rarely the highest-margin point in the chain — the money is made around it.

---

2. What it is and how it's structured

Scope. NAICS (the North American Industry Classification System) code 561591 covers establishments primarily engaged in marketing and promoting a community and its facilities to business and leisure travelers — helping organizations locate meeting and convention sites, providing information on attractions, lodging, and restaurants, producing maps, and organizing local group tours [1].

A CVB typically performs four functions:

1. Destination advertising and public relations.
2. Convention and group sales — leads, bids, site inspections, and planner support.
3. Visitor information and local itinerary assistance.
4. Research, partner services, and coordination among hotels, venues, attractions, restaurants, and government.

What it excludes (adjacent codes, so you know where the boundaries are) [1]:

• 561510 Travel Agencies and 561520 Tour Operators — these sell and arrange travel for a fee or commission; a CVB markets a place and does not sell you the trip.
• 561599 All Other Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services — reservation, ticketing, and related services.
• 561920 Convention and Trade Show Organizers — the for-profit companies that own and run the actual trade shows and conventions (where the listed events pure-plays live).
• 711310 Promoters of Performing Arts, Sports, and Similar Events with Facilities — convention-center and arena operators.
• 921190 Other General Government Support — tourism offices run directly as government agencies (many state and city tourism departments) are classified here as public administration, not counted as businesses. This exclusion matters a lot for the size figures (Section 3).

Ownership and control. Direct control of a CVB commonly takes one of three forms [3][4]:

1. Independent non-profit — most commonly a 501(c)(6) business league (a tax-exempt trade-association structure under the Internal Revenue Code that bars private inurement and shareholder distributions), sometimes a 501(c)(3) charity. This is the most common model [6].
2. Government agency / department — a division of a city, county, or state government, sometimes contracting a non-profit DMO to do the marketing.
3. Quasi-governmental public authority — a special-purpose local government entity, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) being the marquee example, often with taxing and bond-issuing power.

Equity ownership in the stock-market sense does not exist here. "Owners" are members (hotels, attractions, restaurants) and the taxpaying public. Destinations International, the industry's benchmarking body, reports that destination organizations in its survey drew 92% of funding from public-sector sources and 8% from private sources — a funding measure rather than a formal ownership census, but it captures how public this industry is [5].

---

3. How big it is

Federal business statistics for NAICS 561591 (the years differ because County Business Patterns and the Economic Census are separate programs):

So as a business industry this is small: under 1,000 establishments, fewer than 9,000 employees, and about $2.7 billion of the bureaus' own revenue.

The undercount caveat is unusually large here — read it before using the numbers. County Business Patterns (CBP) covers establishments with paid employees but excludes public administration, most government employees, and non-employer businesses [10]; the Economic Census generally excludes government-owned establishments even when their activity resembles a covered industry [11]. That matters because many of the largest destination organizations in the country are exactly that — government authorities and city/state tourism departments (NAICS 921190). The LVCVA alone runs a fiscal-2026 budget near $460 million [14][15] — a single government authority whose budget is roughly one-sixth the size of the entire $2.66 billion "industry" the Economic Census measures. Counting government-run offices and the smallest operations, industry directories put the total number of U.S. destination organizations in the low thousands rather than the ~860 firms the business census captures [12][13]. Treat the federal figures as an employer-market baseline — "the private/non-profit slice the business census can see" — not as total U.S. spending on destination marketing.

A second, more conceptual caveat: even a bureau's own revenue understates its economic footprint, because its output is measured by the visitor spending and tax revenue it helps generate for the wider economy — part of that $1.3 trillion U.S. travel economy [2] — not by the modest sums that pass through its own budget. The federal file reports no operating profit, margins, room-night bookings, or per-CVB visitor spending; those metrics do not exist in the ground-truth data and should not be inferred.

---

4. The investable universe

There is no publicly traded convention-and-visitors-bureau stock, and there is no obvious pure-play whose primary business is NAICS 561591. CVBs are non-profits and government bodies by design. An investor gets exposure only around the edges — to the businesses that sell to CVBs, the events industry adjacent to them, and the travel economy they feed. The cleanest direct exposure is on the debt side, not equity (see below and Section 10).

Public equities — the adjacent ecosystem (tickers reserved for this section):

Major private owners and operators (not investable via public equity — they own, operate, or supply the infrastructure through which CVB-generated demand becomes revenue):

• DMO technology vendors — the "picks and shovels" sold to bureaus (websites, CRM, partner databases, digital passes). The market has consolidated hard: Granicus (private, PE-backed) acquired Simpleview in September 2024, folding in Tempest and partner Bandwango; Simpleview alone serves 1,000+ destinations [23]. Cvent, the leading meetings-and-events software platform, was taken private by Blackstone for ~$4.6 billion in 2023 (with minority participation from the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Vista Equity Partners) [24].
• Convention-center and venue operators. Legends Global acquired ASM Global in 2024 (Legends is majority-owned by Sixth Street, alongside the New York Yankees and the Jones family), combining venue management, booking, and premium hospitality [25]. Oak View Group (private) won a private management and food-service contract for Chicago's McCormick Place campus [26].
• Convention and group hotels. Private owner-operators such as MCR Hotels (~$5 billion of assets, 25,000+ rooms across ~150 hotels) hold the lodging real estate that convention demand fills [27].
• The bureaus themselves — non-profits and government authorities; not ownable.

The cleanest direct route — municipal bonds. For income and private-credit investors, the most literal way to invest in this industry is to buy the hotel-/room-tax and convention-center revenue bonds that fund destination authorities. The LVCVA, for example, issues obligations serviced by Clark County room taxes and supported by convention-center leasing revenue [14]. These instruments give bondholders a direct claim on a destination's tourism-tax stream — the same cash flow that pays for the marketing.

---

5. How the money works

CVBs don't earn profit; they run a tax-funded flywheel. They monetize access to public funding and local business relationships rather than selling a conventional consumer product. The mechanics determine the industry's cyclicality and who bears the risk.

Where the money comes from [3][4]:

1. Hotel occupancy / transient occupancy / lodging tax (the dominant source). A percentage levied on hotel and short-term-rental room revenue; a statutory share is earmarked for the CVB. Visitors — not local taxpayers — fund it. Typically the majority of a bureau's budget.
2. Tourism Improvement District (TID) assessments. A self-imposed fee (commonly 1–4% of the room rate) that hotels in a district agree to levy on themselves, with proceeds managed by the DMO. Visit California, for instance, funds statewide marketing through an assessment collected from travel-related businesses [28]. TIDs are spreading fast because they give bureaus a more stable, industry-controlled base than politically exposed tax appropriations [32][33].
3. Membership dues from hotels, restaurants, and attractions.
4. Co-op marketing and advertising revenue (visitor-guide ad sales, partner programs, sponsorships).
5. Facility revenue for the minority of authorities that also operate convention centers (the LVCVA earns a meaningful slice from convention-center charges) [14].
6. Government contracts, sales-tax allocations, and grants — e.g., New York City Tourism + Conventions reports both a city contract and other public funding [29].

The flywheel: visitor pays hotel tax → funds the CVB → CVB markets the destination and books conventions → more overnight visitors → more hotel-tax revenue → bigger CVB budget. Because funding is geared to room revenue, a bureau's budget rises and falls with hotel occupancy and average daily rate (ADR) — it is effectively a leveraged bet on local lodging demand. The chain is: public/partner funding → destination marketing and group sales → visitors and meetings → hotel rooms, venue rentals, food and beverage, attractions, transportation, and local tax receipts.

The metrics that actually run this industry (the CVB equivalent of same-store sales):

• Room nights generated / booked — the headline output, especially convention room-night bookings on the group-sales side; plus qualified convention leads and conversion rates.
• Economic impact and return on marketing investment (ROI) — visitor spending or tax revenue produced per marketing dollar; bureaus live and die by these studies when budgets are debated.
• Hotel demand and revenue lift. A Tourism Economics study of 30 years of data found cities with an established TID saw hotel room demand about 2.1% higher and room revenue about 4.5% higher than comparable cities without one [32] — the closest thing the industry has to a hard return figure.
• Definite/tentative convention bookings in the pipeline (a backlog analog), plus in-market hotel occupancy and ADR, visitor-center traffic, and web/lead volume.

For hotel and venue investors, the more useful metrics are occupancy, ADR, revenue per available room (RevPAR), group-room-night share, banquet revenue, venue utilization, booking pace, cancellations, and ancillary spend — Host Hotels' disclosure that group business was 36% of 2024 room sales illustrates why hotel-level data can beat CVB receipts [18]. For the muni-bond investor, the economics reduce to one thing: hotel-tax revenue coverage — how comfortably pledged room-tax collections cover debt service, and how volatile those collections are through a downturn.

---

6. What drives demand

Demand for what a CVB produces — and therefore its funding — is driven by:

• Overall travel volume and the business cycle. Travel is discretionary; corporate travel budgets are among the first cut in a recession, and MICE (meetings, incentives, conventions, and exhibitions) demand is highly cyclical. The Bureau of Economic Analysis reports real travel-and-tourism output rose 7.0% in 2023 after a 20.8% rebound in 2022 [30].
• Hotel occupancy and room rates, directly, because funding is a percentage of room revenue.
• The convention/group calendar — large city-wide events and rotating conventions producing concentrated room nights.
• Destination inventory — hotel room supply, convention-center quality, attractions, safety, walkability, and entertainment determine whether interest converts into bookings.
• International inbound travel, sensitive to the U.S. dollar, visa and border policy, travel advisories, and national marketing (Brand USA — Section 7).
• Air access ("airlift") and travel costs (fuel, fares, airport and rail capacity).
• Local tax and funding policy — the hotel-tax rate and whether a TID exists set the size of the budget regardless of demand.
• Corporate and workforce trends — hybrid work may cut routine business travel but can raise the value of purposeful in-person gatherings.
• Marquee event pipelines. Hosting a mega-event resets a destination's demand curve — unusually rich in 2026–2028 (Section 10). The U.S. Travel Association's Spring 2026 forecast calls for modest real growth in business/group travel and flags the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics as inbound supports (a forecast, not an observed result) [36].

---

7. Regulation

This is a lightly regulated business but a heavily governed public-money activity. There is no single federal operating license for CVBs; regulation is mainly local and structural.

• State lodging-tax enabling statutes authorize the hotel occupancy tax and dictate how proceeds may be spent — almost always restricted to promoting tourism and the convention/hotel industry. Texas, for example, allows hotel-occupancy-tax spending only within nine statutory categories, each of which must "directly enhance and promote tourism" [31]. Misuse invites clawbacks.
• TID / business-improvement-district laws govern how a tourism district is formed — typically a petition by the affected hotels plus local-government approval — and how the self-assessment is collected [32][33].
• Non-profit tax rules. For a 501(c)(6) business league, earnings cannot benefit private shareholders or individuals [6]. Government authorities face public-transparency and open-meeting laws, audits, and procurement rules; public convention-center contracts may be competitively procured (McCormick Place's selection of Oak View Group is an example) [26].
• Venue, hotel, and event operations face separate rules on building safety, accessibility, labor, alcohol, advertising, insurance, data privacy, and crowd management.
• Short-term-rental tax collection. States and platforms (Airbnb, Vrbo) now widely remit lodging taxes, expanding the funding base — a regulatory tailwind of the last decade.
• Federal layer — Brand USA. The national destination-marketing organization is funded by a federal match (historically up to $100 million) drawn from the ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) fee paid by Visa Waiver Program visitors, plus private contributions [34]. Its funding is politically contingent: the federal match was cut sharply (reported from $100 million toward $20 million), the ESTA fee was raised to $40, and its congressional authorization expires at the end of September 2027, with the "VISIT USA Act" filed to restore funding [34][35]. This is the biggest live regulatory story in the sector.

The single most important regulatory risk for investors is usually funding-policy risk: a city or state can redirect room-tax revenue, change an assessment, or impose new conditions on the destination organization.

---

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

The competitive picture has an unusual shape: the bureaus barely compete as businesses — they compete as destinations. By federal measures the industry is about as fragmented as an industry gets: the four largest firms hold just 15.7% of revenue, the top 50 hold 58.4%, and the HHI (a standard concentration score where 10,000 is a monopoly) is only 118.1 [8]. That is essentially the arithmetic of "every city has exactly one bureau, and no single one is large nationally" — though the reading is softened by government and non-profit undercoverage (Section 3). A CVB's real rivalry is against other cities bidding for the same convention or leisure visitor, fought on incentives, hotel package rates, air access, research quality, and the ability to coordinate local partners — not on price to a customer. A local CVB can hold a strong position within its geographic mandate even as the national industry looks dispersed.

Consolidation is real, but it's happening around the bureaus, not among them:

• Technology vendors are rolling up: Granicus's absorption of Simpleview/Tempest/Bandwango created a dominant DMO software stack [23]; Blackstone took Cvent private [24].
• Venue management is consolidating: Legends' acquisition of ASM Global combined booking, hospitality, and convention-center capabilities [25]; Oak View Group expands through private management contracts rather than owning every venue [26].
• Hotel brands and large owners provide national sales, distribution, loyalty, and purchasing scale.
• On the funding side, the model is shifting from membership dues toward TID-based funding, and some regional bureaus are merging governance for scale [32][33].
• Rebranding wave: "Convention & Visitors Bureau" is steadily giving way to "Destination Marketing/Management Organization" and consumer brands like "Visit ," "Discover ," and "Choose ___" — a signal of the industry repositioning from a passive information desk to an economic-development agency.

The likely trend: selective consolidation in technology, venue operations, and hotel ownership, while destination marketing itself stays locally governed.

---

9. Risks

• Funding is highly cyclical and shock-prone. Because budgets are geared to hotel-room revenue, a downturn hits twice — fewer visitors and a smaller marketing budget to win them back. COVID-19 gutted DMO budgets; more recently the LVCVA saw room-tax and gaming-fee receipts fall about 14% year-over-year in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 [15]. For muni-bond holders, this volatility is the core credit risk.
• Political raids on dedicated funds. Hotel-tax revenue is a tempting target; legislatures and city councils periodically try to divert it to general funds, threatening bureau budgets and, indirectly, bonds pledged against those taxes.
• Federal retrenchment in inbound marketing. Brand USA funding cuts, higher entry fees, and travel-advisory friction weigh on international arrivals, which had been forecast to decline in 2025 [34][35].
• Disintermediation and relevance risk. Online travel agencies, Google, social media, and AI trip-planning tools increasingly do what the visitor center and printed guide used to — raising hard questions about the CVB's role and ROI.
• Structural change in business travel. Hybrid and virtual meetings permanently reduced some convention demand; corporate-travel recovery has been uneven.
• Venue overbuilding. Convention centers are capital-intensive public assets; weak utilization can create debt and maintenance pressure.
• Labor and input-cost inflation at hotels and venues (wages, insurance, utilities, food, audio-visual, security).
• Overtourism backlash in a handful of destinations, which can flip a bureau's mandate from "attract more" to "manage impact."
• Measurement risk. CVB receipts do not equal destination-wide visitor spending, hotel revenue, or investor earnings — a recurring source of confusion when sizing the opportunity.

---

10. How to invest, and the outlook

Treat this as a demand-and-infrastructure theme, not a standalone CVB equity sector. Since no pure-play exists, public investors express a view through the demand CVBs channel; private investors own or finance the infrastructure that captures it.

Public-market routes (indirect):

• The events value chain — Emerald Holding (EEX) is the closest U.S.-listed proxy; Informa and RELX/RX internationally.
• Lodging and group-hotel exposure — Ryman Hospitality (RHP) for the most concentrated convention-resort real estate, Host Hotels (HST) for broader upscale lodging with meaningful group demand, and the hotel brands (MAR/HLT/H) for network/brand/franchise economics.
• Destination-anchored gaming/resorts — MGM (MGM) and Caesars (CZR) in convention-heavy Las Vegas.
• Business travel and meetings tech — Amex GBTG (GBTG).
• Travel platforms — Booking (BKNG), Expedia (EXPE), Tripadvisor (TRIP) — both a bet on travel demand and on the forces disintermediating the CVB.

Private-market routes (more direct):

• Municipal bonds backed by hotel/room-tax and convention-center revenue (e.g., LVCVA obligations) — the most literal way to own a destination's tourism-tax cash flow, suited to income investors comfortable with cyclical coverage [14].
• Private equity / private credit in the DMO-technology and event-services stack (Granicus, Cvent) and venue management (Legends/ASM Global, Oak View Group) — the profit-making layer that sells to the non-profit bureaus [23][24][25][26].
• Convention-center and group-hotel real estate, where underwriting depends directly on a market's convention pipeline and future hotel supply.

Due diligence should focus on funding durability, hotel-tax growth, room-night conversion, destination air access, future hotel supply, convention-center capital needs, labor agreements, event-cancellation exposure, partner retention, and — crucially — who actually captures the resulting room, venue, food-and-beverage, parking, and technology revenue.

Near-term drivers (forward-looking). The next few years are unusually event-rich, which tends to reset host-market demand and, with it, hotel-tax funding:

• The 2026 FIFA (Fédération Internationale de Football Association) World Cup across North America, with matches in multiple U.S. host cities — a concentrated boost for those bureaus.
• The U.S. Semiquincentennial (America's 250th anniversary) in 2026, a nationwide domestic-travel hook.
• The 2028 Los Angeles Summer Olympics, a multi-year build-up for Southern California destinations.

Against those tailwinds sit two headwinds to watch: the trajectory of international inbound travel (dollar, visa/border policy, advisories) and the fight over Brand USA's funding and reauthorization ahead of its September 2027 expiry [34][35].

Bottom line. Convention and visitors bureaus are a small, fragmented, non-profit/government industry — but they are a clean, leveraged sensor on U.S. hotel and group-travel demand. You cannot buy a bureau. You can buy the events companies, hotels, venues, and travel platforms that live on the demand bureaus create, or, most directly, the hotel-tax bonds that fund them. The core judgment for any of these routes is the same one the bureaus themselves live by: where lodging demand — leisure, group, and international — is headed next.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau. 2022 NAICS Definition — 561591 Convention and Visitors Bureaus. https://www.census.gov/naics/?details=561591&input=561591&year=2022
2. U.S. Travel Association. Economic Impact of the U.S. Travel Industry (2024 data), 2025. https://www.ustravel.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/Travel_Industry_Data_Fact_Sheet.pdf
3. Rediscover America (U.S. Travel). What Is a Destination Organization — Funding Models and Impact, 2024. https://www.rediscoveramerica.com/about/what-is-a-destination-organization/
4. ConventionBureaus.com. How Are Convention Bureaus Funded?, 2024. https://www.conventionbureaus.com/how-are-convention-bureaus-funded/
5. Destinations International & Tourism Economics. Destination Promotion: A Catalyst for Community Vitality (92% public / 8% private funding), 2024. https://destinationsinternational.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/Tourism%20Economics-Destinations%20International%20Master%20Report-v1.2.pdf
6. Internal Revenue Service. Business Leagues (501(c)(6)), 2026. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/other-non-profits/business-leagues
7. U.S. Census Bureau. County Business Patterns 2023 — NAICS 561591 (establishments, employment, annual and Q1 payroll). https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2023/econ/cbp/2023-cbp.html
8. U.S. Census Bureau. 2022 Economic Census — Concentration of Largest Firms, NAICS 561591 (firms, receipts, CR4/CR8/CR20/CR50, HHI). https://api.census.gov/data/2022/ecnsize/groups/EC2200SIZECONCEN.html
9. U.S. Small Business Administration. Table of Small Business Size Standards (NAICS 561591 = $25.0M), 2023. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
10. U.S. Census Bureau. County Business Patterns Methodology (coverage/exclusions). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/technical-documentation/methodology.html
11. U.S. Census Bureau. Economic Census: Understanding NAICS / Industry Classification (government-establishment exclusion). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census/year/2022/guidance/understanding-naics.html
12. IBISWorld. Convention & Visitor Bureaus in the US — Number of Businesses, 2024. https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/number-of-businesses/convention-visitor-bureaus-united-states/
13. Cause IQ. Visitor and Convention Bureaus (non-profit directory), 2024. https://www.causeiq.com/directory/visitor-and-convention-bureaus-list/
14. Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. Funding & Finance, 2026. https://www.lvcva.com/governance/funding-finance/
15. Las Vegas Review-Journal. LVCVA board gets first look at $460M fiscal '26 budget; room-tax and gaming-fee revenue down, 2025. https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/tourism/lvcva-board-gets-1st-look-at-460m-budget-expects-dip-in-tax-revenue-3371769/
16. Emerald Holding, Inc. Company profile and FY2025 results (via PitchBook / company reporting), 2026. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/56294-29
17. Ryman Hospitality Properties. About Us, accessed 2026. https://www.rymanhp.com/about-us/
18. Host Hotels & Resorts. Reports Results for 2024 (group = 36% of room sales), 2025. https://ir.hosthotels.com/news-releases/news-release-details/host-hotels-resorts-inc-reports-results-2024
19. MGM Resorts International. 2024 Form 10-K, 2025. https://investors.mgmresorts.com/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/MGM-12-31-2024-10-K.pdf
20. Marriott International. Corporate Overview and Meetings & Events by Marriott Hotels, accessed 2026. https://marriott.gcs-web.com/corporate-overview
21. Hilton Worldwide Holdings. 2024 Year in Review, 2025. https://stories.hilton.com/2024-annual-report
22. American Express Global Business Travel. 2024 Financial Results, 2025. https://investors.amexglobalbusinesstravel.com/investors/news/news-details/2025/
23. Granicus / Simpleview. Destination Marketing Technology & Services (Simpleview / Tempest / Bandwango acquisition), 2024. https://granicus.com/market/destinations/
24. Blackstone. Blackstone Completes Acquisition of Cvent (~$4.6B), 2023. https://www.blackstone.com/news/press/blackstone-completes-acquisition-of-cvent/
25. Legends Global. Legends Completes Acquisition of ASM Global, 2024. https://legendsglobal.com/legends-completes-acquisition-of-asm-global/
26. Oak View Group. McCormick Place Announces Oak View Group as New Private Management and Food Service Partner, 2023. https://www.oakviewgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/FINAL-FINAL_MPEA-OVG-Release-7.27.23-1.pdf
27. MCR Hotels. About / Company Profile (~$5B AUM, 25,000+ rooms, ~150 hotels), accessed 2026. https://www.mcrhotels.com/about/
28. Visit California. A Shared Investment in Tourism (industry assessment), accessed 2026. https://industry.visitcalifornia.com/about/shared-tourism-investment
29. New York City Tourism + Conventions. Annual Report 2023–24, 2024. https://corporate.nyctourism.com/annual-report/2024
30. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. U.S. Travel and Tourism Satellite Account for 2018–2023 (real output +7.0% in 2023, +20.8% in 2022), 2025. https://apps.bea.gov/scb/issues/2025/02-february/0225-travel-tourism-satellite-account.htm
31. Texas Border Business. Brownsville CVB Accepting Applications for Hotel Occupancy Tax Funding (Texas HOT nine statutory categories), 2024. https://texasborderbusiness.com/brownsville-convention-and-visitors-bureau-accepting-applications-for-hotel-occupancy-tax-funding/
32. Epsilon. Tourism Improvement Districts: The New Funding Source for Destination Marketers (Tourism Economics 30-year study: +2.1% room demand, +4.5% room revenue), 2024. https://www.epsilon.com/us/insights/blog/tourism-improvement-districts-the-new-alternate-funding-source-for-destination-marketers
33. Wikipedia. Tourism Improvement District, 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_improvement_district
34. U.S. Travel Association. Brand USA fact sheet and Renew Brand USA (ESTA-fee funding, federal match, reauthorization), 2025. https://www.ustravel.org/issues/brand-usa
35. Travel Weekly. The battle for Brand USA's survival: securing funding and future authorization (ESTA fee to $40; VISIT USA Act; authorization expires Sept. 2027), 2025. https://www.travelweekly.com/Travel-News/Government/Brand-USA-fights-for-restored-funding-and-its-own-survival
36. U.S. Travel Association. U.S. Travel Forecast: Spring 2026, 2026. https://www.ustravel.org/sites/default/files/2026-05/US_Travel-Forecast_Spring26.pdf