Insurance and Employee Benefit Funds (U.S.) — NAICS 5251

A Histometrics rollup primer for public-market and private investors. This is a four-digit "industry group" that gathers three distinct child industries. Its value is the contrast across them — which is largest, which is growing, who owns them, and how (indirectly) you can invest. Figures are the latest available; forward-looking statements are worded as judgments, not facts.

---

1. Overview

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) is the U.S. government's standard code for industries. It nests: two-digit sector 52 (Finance and Insurance) contains three-digit subsector 525 (Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles), which contains four-digit industry group 5251 — Insurance and Employee Benefit Funds, the level covered here. Below 5251 sit three five-digit industries, each with a single six-digit child: 52511 Pension Funds, 52512 Health and Welfare Funds, and 52519 Other Insurance Funds. [1]

What ties all three together is a single idea: a 5251 entity is a pooled legal vehicle — a fund, trust, or plan — organized to provide retirement income, benefits, or insurance for its own sponsor, employees, or members, not to sell policies for profit to the public. [1] These are asset owners and risk pools, not sellers. Almost all are tax-exempt trusts or government systems. That has one blunt consequence for investors: you cannot buy any entity in 5251. There is no "pension fund stock," no publicly traded welfare trust, no share in a state workers'-compensation fund. What you can own — and what this primer keeps pointing to — is the for-profit ecosystem that serves these pools: the asset managers, custodians, record-keepers, insurers, administrators, and brokers that live in other NAICS codes and earn fees from 5251's trillions.

The three children differ sharply in size, direction, and ownership, and that contrast — not any single number — is the point of this page.

---

2. What's inside — the three child industries and how they differ

All three are non-commercial pools, but they are built for different purposes, at wildly different scale, owned by different kinds of sponsor, and connected to different investable businesses. The table is the heart of this rollup; the prose beneath explains it.

Size is the first and biggest contrast. Pension funds dwarf the other two. The U.S. retirement pool nearest to 52511 is roughly $27–30 trillion [2][7]; health-and-welfare trusts hold, at most, "low trillions" (and even that overstates it, because most ERISA-plan assets are pension money, not welfare money) [6]; and the entire "other insurance funds" category — the biggest state WC funds plus the captive and self-insurance world — is measured in tens of billions of assets, a rounding error next to pensions [9][14]. By dollars, 5251 is pensions with two small satellites. By number of entities and everyday relevance, the satellites punch above their asset weight: nearly every U.S. worker touches a health plan, and nearly every employer must carry workers'-comp somewhere.

Direction of travel differs too. The pension pool grows with markets and demographics even as its shape shifts from employer-promised DB plans toward worker-directed DC accounts like 401(k)s [5]. Health-and-welfare funds are slowly disappearing (fewer, larger union trusts as private-sector union membership falls) even as the fees for servicing self-funded health plans rise [11]. And "other insurance funds" is the one place where risk is actively moving toward the pooled vehicle — employers keep forming captives and self-insurance groups to escape the commercial insurance cycle [14].

Ownership is the third contrast, and it decides how you invest. Pensions are dominated by governments (the single largest U.S. plans are all public systems). Health-and-welfare is dominated by organized labor (the archetype is a jointly trusteed union fund). Other insurance funds split three ways among states, member groups, and single corporate parents. None of those owners issue stock — so in all three cases the investable exposure sits one step removed, in the servicing and carrier firms named in the last column.

For the full treatment of each child, read its own primer: 52511 (Pension Funds), 52512 (Health and Welfare Funds), and 52519 (Other Insurance Funds). This page summarizes and contrasts; it does not restate them.

---

3. Size (this level's rollup figures)

We have no ingested federal statistical metrics for NAICS 5251 — no verified establishment count, revenue, employment, payroll, premium, or asset figure — and that blank is expected, not an oversight. Our ground-truth file for this node is empty, so every number below is drawn from the child primers' cited sources and labeled as such. We do not invent a total and never report a suppressed value.

The blank is structural. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that entities in NAICS 525 "earn interest, dividends, and other investment income, but have little or no employment and no revenue from the sale of services." [3] Because of that, the standard industry-sizing machinery deliberately omits this whole group: the Census Bureau's County Business Patterns (CBP) excludes pension, health, welfare, and other insurance funds by design, and its Statistics of U.S. Businesses (SUSB) misses most of the activity too. [4][8] The one federal figure attached to every child is the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) size standard of $40 million in average annual receipts — a contracting-eligibility ceiling, not a measure of industry revenue or assets. [5-child; here [15]]

You must therefore size 5251 by assets and participants, not by the business census — and the numbers below use different scopes, dates, and jurisdictions, so they overlap and are not additive. They are complementary lenses:

• Pensions (52511) — the bulk of the level. The Investment Company Institute (ICI) put total U.S. retirement assets at about $49.1 trillion at year-end 2025; the employer- and government-sponsored slice nearest to 52511 is roughly $27 trillion. [2] The Federal Reserve's Financial Accounts put private and public pension funds at about $29.6 trillion in financial assets (Q1 2026) — a broader, directionally consistent measure. [7] The Department of Labor (DOL) counted about 836,800 private pension plans, ~155 million participant records, and $12.4 trillion in assets on 2023 Form 5500 filings (private plans only) [16]; the Census Bureau's survey of public pensions reported $5.99 trillion in state and local systems in 2024. [17]
• Health and welfare (52512) — a distant second. DOL's Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) oversees roughly 2.8 million health plans and 619,000 other welfare plans covering ~153 million people, inside an estimated $12.8 trillion of assets across all ERISA-covered plans — but most of that dollar figure is pension, not welfare, money. [6] The cleanest welfare-only slice is multiemployer coverage: about 1,478 multiemployer health plans covering ~5.3 million participants. [6-child] Treat this child as "several thousand trusts, low trillions in assets."
• Other insurance funds (52519) — the smallest. The three largest state WC funds — Ohio's Bureau of Workers' Compensation (~$28 billion in assets), the New York State Insurance Fund (~$24 billion), and California's State Compensation Insurance Fund (~$21 billion) — hold roughly $70 billion between them. [9][10][11] The self-insurance side is measured in premium: Vermont alone (the leading captive domicile) had 683 active captives at year-end 2024, and globally an estimated 8,000 captives wrote about $50 billion of premium. [14]

Undercount caveat. For all three children, standard business statistics dramatically understate economic scale, because ownership is overwhelmingly government, mutual/member, union-trust, or single-firm — precisely the structures the employer-business surveys miss. A fund can control tens of billions in obligations while showing almost no payroll of its own, since the actual work (investing, administration, claims) is booked to servicing firms in other NAICS codes. Read the whole group as a very large pool of capital — dominated by pensions — that ordinary business statistics barely register.

---

4. Investable universe — where value concentrates across the children

Because nothing in 5251 issues stock, the investable value sits entirely in the adjacent for-profit firms that serve the pools — and which firms depends on which child you want exposure to. That is the practical payoff of the Section 2 contrast: the three children map to three (partly overlapping) investable neighborhoods.

• Around pensions (52511): the deepest and most liquid opportunity set — asset managers paid a percentage of assets under management (AUM) (e.g., BlackRock, State Street, T. Rowe Price); custodians and record-keepers paid servicing and per-account fees (BNY, Northern Trust, Principal, Voya, Alight); consultants/actuaries (Marsh & McLennan/Mercer, Aon); life insurers active in pension risk transfer (PRT), who take DB liabilities off corporate balance sheets for a spread-and-longevity return (Prudential, MetLife, Apollo/Athene, Corebridge, Brookfield); and alternatives managers funded by pension limited-partner capital (Blackstone, Apollo, Brookfield). [8][9][21-child]
• Around health and welfare (52512): the servicing layer for self-funded benefits — health-account platforms (HealthEquity, WEX); benefits administration (Alight); PBM/insurer/administrative-services servicing (UnitedHealth–Optum, CVS Health, Cigna, Elevance); stop-loss carriers (Sun Life, Voya); and benefits brokerage/consulting (Marsh McLennan, Aon, WTW, Arthur J. Gallagher, Brown & Brown).
• Around other insurance funds (52519): a fee-based service layer (brokers and captive managers Aon and Marsh & McLennan; claims administrators Arthur J. Gallagher and CorVel) and the risk-bearing carriers that compete with the funds (WC specialists AMERISAFE and Employers Holdings; diversified property-casualty insurers Travelers, The Hartford, Berkshire Hathaway).

Two cautions carry across all three. First, the biggest servicers are often not public — Fidelity, Vanguard, and TIAA in pensions; Zenith American, Segal, and Milliman in welfare; Sedgwick, AmTrust, and Liberty Mutual around insurance funds — so the listed names are a partial map. Second, for every listed carrier or broker the 5251-linked business is usually a slice of a broader company, not a pure play. Treat all of these as exposure to the same risk and fee pool, not as bets on the funds themselves. The child primers carry the full company-by-company tables.

---

5. How the money works

None of these entities is a business that sells a product for profit, so ordinary earnings metrics miss the point at the fund level. The same simplified flow runs through all three children — contributions or premiums in → reserves invested → benefits or claims paid → surplus retained, returned to members, or used to lower future contributions — but the governing discipline differs:

• Pensions (52511) are run to a funded ratio (assets ÷ the value of promised benefits). The contested dial is the discount rate / assumed return: a higher assumption makes today's liability look smaller. Median public-plan assumptions have drifted from ~8.0% (2010) toward ~7.0% today, and the reach for that return has pushed large public funds to roughly one-third in alternatives. [13-child][14-child]
• Health and welfare (52512) funds are run to a reserve measured in months of benefits. Money in is employer contributions (often a fixed rate per covered hour, set by the collective-bargaining agreement) plus investment income; money out is claims, carrier/stop-loss premiums, and administration. There is no profit to distribute. [6-child]
• Other insurance funds (52519) are run to a combined ratio and surplus adequacy, with the profit engine being investment income on long-tail "float" (California's State Fund earned $572 million of investment income in 2024), and excess returned to members as policyholder dividends rather than to outside shareholders (Texas Mutual paid a $340 million dividend in 2023). [11-child][12-child]

The for-profit economics — the part investors actually buy — live in the servicing and carrier layer: percentage-of-AUM fees on sticky long-horizon money (asset managers), per-account/per-participant servicing fees in a scale game (custodians, record-keepers, TPAs, health-account platforms), spread-plus-longevity returns (PRT insurers), and float-driven underwriting profit (WC carriers). The recurring analytical trap, common to all three: an administrator's fee revenue is not the fund's asset or contribution pool — never value the servicer off the size of the money it merely touches.

---

6. Demand drivers

The three children respond to different forces, which is why they move out of sync:

• Pensions (52511): demographics and aging; the decades-long DB-to-DC shift; automatic enrollment under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement) for new plans; interest rates (the master variable for funded status and PRT timing); DB "de-risking" (PRT, liability-driven investing, outsourced chief-investment-officer mandates); and the private-market allocation that underwrites alternatives. [5][22-child]
• Health and welfare (52512): covered hours worked in union trades; collective-bargaining outcomes that set contribution rates; union density (the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported a private-sector union membership rate of 5.9% in 2025 — an important but declining channel); and, above all, medical and specialty-drug cost trend, running well ahead of general inflation. The broader tailwind for the investable layer is the ongoing shift to self-funding, which grows service fees even when the number of funds does not. [32-child][11-child]
• Other insurance funds (52519): payroll and employment (WC premium is roughly payroll × a rate); the commercial insurance price cycle (hard pricing pushes employers toward self-insurance and captives); claims-cost inflation; injury frequency (a long decline has softened loss costs); interest rates (higher rates boost the investment income that is the profit engine); and state statutory mandates that make baseline WC demand non-cyclical. [11-child][14-child]

The common thread: interest rates move all three (funded status, custodial yield, and float income), and the migration of risk and administration to specialist, often-consolidating servicers grows the investable fee pool across the board.

---

7. Regulation

Regulation of 5251 splits along a private-vs-governmental line that cuts across the children:

• Private-sector plans in both pensions and health-and-welfare fall under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), enforced by DOL's EBSA and the IRS, with fiduciary duties and the annual Form 5500 disclosure. [16][6] For union health-and-welfare funds, the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA/Taft-Hartley) adds equal labor-management trusteeship, and Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(9) governs VEBA tax status; the Affordable Care Act, COBRA, HIPAA, and mental-health parity rules layer on top. [9-child][8-child]
• Insurance backstop is uneven. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) insures private DB pension benefits (protecting >40 million people) — but it insures neither DC accounts nor health-and-welfare funds. If an H&W fund runs out of money, benefits are simply cut; there is no federal safety net. [15-child][6-child]
• Governmental and insurance vehicles run under state law. Public pensions are outside ERISA and PBGC, reporting under Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) rules (which permit higher discount rates and larger reported gaps). "Other insurance funds" are governed at the state level under the McCarran-Ferguson framework, coordinated through the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC): state WC funds are creatures of statute; self-insurance and group pools require state approval and stop-loss reinsurance (group funds carry joint-and-several liability); captives answer to their domicile regulator; and RRGs operate under the federal Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986. Four monopolistic states — Ohio, North Dakota, Washington, and Wyoming — bar private WC carriers, forcing employers to buy from the state fund. [6-child][7-child][15-child]

A rising wave of ERISA fiduciary "excessive fee" litigation now touches both pension and health-plan vendors — a cross-cutting risk for the servicers investors actually own. [14-child]

---

8. Consolidation

The funds themselves rarely consolidate — each is built for a specific sponsor, union, or member group — so the M&A action is almost entirely in the servicing and carrier layer, and it is fast across all three children:

• Pensions: the U.S. PRT market has run near record volume (~$51.8 billion in 2024), led by Athene (Apollo) and Prudential, as corporations offload pension liabilities to private-equity-backed insurers for permanent capital; DC record-keeping has concentrated so that the ten largest providers held 78% of assets in 2023, up from 56% in 2013; and the largest asset managers (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street) together control on the order of $30 trillion. [9][21-child][8]
• Health and welfare: private equity is rolling up independent TPAs (Zenith American); brokers are acquiring benefits capability (Arthur J. Gallagher's 2025 purchases of AssuredPartners for $13.8 billion and Woodruff Sawyer for $1.2 billion); and three PBMs process roughly 80% of U.S. prescription claims. [16-child][25-child][13-child]
• Other insurance funds: brokers and administrators (Aon, Marsh, Gallagher, Sedgwick) keep rolling up captive-management and claims services, while the distinctive trend is conversion and privatization — Texas turned its state fund into policyholder-owned Texas Mutual, Colorado floated a 2025 plan to privatize Pinnacol Assurance, and Employers Holdings traces to Nevada's former state fund and now trades publicly. [17-child][12-child][13-child]

Across the group, two structural currents run in parallel: scale concentrating among a few mega-servicers, and risk continuing to migrate — into DC accounts, into self-funded health plans, and into captives.

---

9. Risks

The children carry different top risks, but they rhyme:

• Pensions: public-plan solvency (aggregate state and local plans were ~80% funded in 2024, with ~$1.3–1.5 trillion unfunded); return-assumption risk (public plans must actually earn ~7%); interest-rate whiplash that swings funded status by hundreds of billions in a quarter; and PRT counterparty risk as liabilities migrate into private-equity-owned, credit-heavy insurers. [18-child][19-child][13-child][9]
• Health and welfare: cost trend outrunning bargained contributions (the core structural risk); catastrophic claims (a single gene-therapy case can run into the millions); no PBGC safety net; declining covered hours from recession or falling union density; and fiduciary/compliance litigation. [17-child][6-child][14-child]
• Other insurance funds: long-tail reserve risk (WC claims develop over decades); medical and legal inflation; investment risk on a large bond portfolio; joint-and-several assessments in group self-insurance; and political/privatization risk for state funds. [9-child][11-child][13-child]

Three risks are common to the whole group and to the firms investors actually own: interest-rate sensitivity (funded status, custodial yield, and float income all move with rates); fee compression and fiduciary litigation across management, record-keeping, and administration; and concentration risk — the flip side of consolidation, where one failed platform, custodian, PBM, or insurer can affect many pools at once.

---

10. How to invest & outlook

How to invest. There is no direct pure-play anywhere in 5251 — you invest in the businesses around the funds, matched to the child whose economics you want, and you analyze them by revenue source (separate AUM from assets under custody; separate recurring fees from performance fees; separate an administrator's fee from the pool it merely touches).

• Public-market routes: for pension exposure, asset managers, custodians/record-keepers, consultants, and PRT life insurers; for health-and-welfare exposure, health-account platforms, TPAs/PBMs, stop-loss carriers, and benefits brokers; for other-insurance-fund exposure, insurance brokers, captive managers, claims administrators, and WC carriers. (Tickers and the full lists are in Section 4 and the child primers.)
• Private-market routes: the most direct exposure is co-investing alongside the pools — the private equity, credit, real estate, and infrastructure funds that pensions anchor as limited partners — plus joining or forming a captive or self-insurance group to lower your own cost of risk, and buying the private administration, actuarial, captive-management, and benefits-technology firms that operate around the funds. The return shows up as lower cost of risk and member dividends, not a share price.

Outlook (forward-looking judgments). The three children point in different directions, and the smart read is relative. Pensions are the durable core — a $27–30 trillion pool that persists across cycles, though asset growth won't automatically become earnings growth for the servicers; the highest-momentum sub-story is PRT and the continued DB-to-DC shift under SECURE 2.0. Health and welfare offers growth in the fee layer even as the fund count shrinks — driven by self-funding and rising complexity, but repriced by PBM reform and fiduciary litigation. Other insurance funds is the smallest but the one where risk is actively migrating toward the pooled vehicle, with higher interest rates supporting float income and episodic state-fund privatization as the rare path by which value here becomes a public security. Across all three, interest rates and consolidation are the shared swing factors.

One-line takeaway: NAICS 5251 — Insurance and Employee Benefit Funds is, by dollars, pensions (52511) with two much smaller satellites — welfare trusts (52512) and other insurance funds (52519) — three non-commercial pools you cannot buy, whose combined tens of trillions are invisible in ordinary business statistics; the investable thesis is never the funds but the fee-collecting managers, insurers, administrators, and brokers around them. For the complete treatment, read the three child primers: 52511, 52512, and 52519.

---

Sources

Drawn from the three child primers (52511, 52512, 52519); this rollup adds no independent sourcing. Bracketed "-child" notes point to the corresponding child primer's own citation for detail.

1. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 NAICS Manual / Definitions — industry group 5251 and industries 525110, 525120, 525190 (definitions, structure, exclusions), 2022. https://www.census.gov/naics/reference_files_tools/2022_NAICS_Manual.pdf
2. Investment Company Institute (ICI), Quarterly Retirement Market Data, Fourth Quarter 2025 (total U.S. retirement assets ≈$49.1T; employer/government pension universe ≈$27T), 2026. https://www.ici.org/statistical-report/ret_25_q4
3. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles: NAICS 525 — Industries at a Glance (little/no employment; no revenue from sale of services), 2025. https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag525.htm
4. U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns — Coverage/Methodology (excludes pension, health, welfare, and other insurance funds), 2022. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/about.html
5. U.S. Department of Labor, EBSA, Private Pension Plan Bulletin: Abstract of 2023 Form 5500 Annual Reports (DB-to-DC shift; plan and participant counts), 2025. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/researchers/statistics/retirement-bulletins/private-pension-plan-bulletins-abstract-2023.pdf
6. U.S. Department of Labor, EBSA, About EBSA (~2.8M health plans; 619,000 welfare plans; ~153M participants; ~$12.8T ERISA assets; PBGC insures pensions only; ~1,478 multiemployer health plans, ~5.3M participants), 2025–2026. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa
7. Federal Reserve Board, Financial Accounts of the United States (Z.1) — Private and Public Pension Funds (≈$29.6T financial assets, Q1 2026), 2026. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?eid=804778&rid=52
8. Thinking Ahead Institute / WTW, World's Largest Asset Managers, 2025; and BlackRock/State Street firm reports, 2025. https://www.thinkingaheadinstitute.org/news/article/worlds-largest-asset-managers-aum-surges-to-record-140-trillion-driven-by-north-america-and-passives/
9. Aon, U.S. Pension Risk Transfer Annual Report (2024 ≈$51.8B) and Prudential, 2024 PRT Year-in-Review, 2025–2026. https://www.aon.com/en/insights/reports/pension-risk-transfer-annual-report
10. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation — overview and financials (~$28B assets), 2025. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Bureau_of_Workers%27_Compensation
11. New York State Insurance Fund, 2024 Annual Report (~$24B); State Compensation Insurance Fund (California), State Fund Facts (~$21B; $572M investment income, 2024), 2025. https://ww3.nysif.com/-/media/Files/NYSIF_Publications/PDF/ANNUAL_REPORTS/Annual_Report_2024_FULL.pdf; https://www.statefundca.com/about/fact-sheet/
12. Texas Mutual Insurance Company / Insurance Journal, Texas Mutual Approves $340M Dividend Distribution, 2023–2024. https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southcentral/2023/05/02/718821.htm
13. Drug Channels Institute; U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Top Pharmacy Benefit Managers (big-3 ≈80% of claims); FTC PBM actions, 2025–2026. https://www.drugchannels.net/2026/03/the-top-pharmacy-benefit-managers-of.html
14. Vermont Department of Financial Regulation, Vermont Captive Data (683 active captives, YE2024); Captive.com, US Captive Insurance Growth Surges in 2024 (~8,000 captives; ~$50B premium), 2025. https://dfr.vermont.gov/captive-insurance/vermont-captive-data; https://www.captive.com/news/us-captive-insurance-growth-surges-in-2024
15. U.S. Small Business Administration, Table of Size Standards (NAICS 525110/525120/525190 = $40M average annual receipts); and The Hartford, Monopolistic State Funds for Workers' Comp (OH, ND, WA, WY), 2023–2025. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards; https://www.thehartford.com/workers-compensation/monopolistic-states
16. U.S. Department of Labor, EBSA, Private Pension Plan Bulletin (~836,800 private pension plans; ~155M participant records; $12.4T assets, 2023), 2025. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/researchers/statistics/retirement-bulletins/private-pension-plan-bulletins-abstract-2023.pdf
17. U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 Annual Survey of Public Pensions (state & local ≈$5.99T; ≈36M members), 2025. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025/2024-annual-survey-public-pensions.html
18. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), Captive Insurance Companies; Workers' Compensation Insurance; Risk Retention Groups, 2025–2026. https://content.naic.org/insurance-topics/captive-insurance-companies
19. International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (IFEBP), Understanding Multiemployer Plans (Taft-Hartley joint trusteeship; LMRA §302(c)(5)), 2025. https://www.ifebp.org/resources---news/toolkits/understanding-multiemployer-plans
20. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Union Membership — 2025 (private-sector union membership rate 5.9%), 2026. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.htm
21. McKinsey & Company, The U.S. Retirement Industry at a Crossroads (top-10 DC record-keepers 78% of assets in 2023 vs 56% in 2013; fee compression), 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/the-us-retirement-industry-at-a-crossroads
22. Internal Revenue Service, Publication 560 / SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (auto-enrollment for new 401(k)/403(b) plans, plan years after 2024), 2025. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p560
23. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, About PBGC (protects >40M; insures private DB only), 2025. https://www.pbgc.gov/about/who-we-are
24. Equable Institute, State of Pensions 2024 (aggregate funded ratio ≈80%); Reason Foundation, Annual Pension Report (state & local unfunded ≈$1.3–1.5T), 2024. https://equable.org/report/state-of-pensions-2024/; https://reason.org/policy-study/annual-pension-report/
25. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 2025 Form 10-K (AssuredPartners $13.8B and Woodruff Sawyer $1.2B acquisitions), 2025. https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000354190&type=10-K
26. Encore Fiduciary, ERISA health-plan fiduciary fee litigation, 2024–2026. https://encorefiduciary.com/plaintiff-firms-secure-standing-excessive-prescription-drug-lawsuits/