Footwear Merchant Wholesalers (U.S.) — NAICS 424340

An investor's primer on the businesses that buy finished shoes and resell them to retailers.

1. Overview

Footwear merchant wholesalers are the middle layer of the shoe business. They buy finished footwear — almost always imported — take ownership of it, warehouse it, and resell it to shoe stores, department stores, off-price chains, sporting-goods retailers, and increasingly to online marketplaces. They do not make shoes and they do not (mainly) sell to the walk-in public. They make money on the spread between landed cost and the wholesale price, and on their ability to manage inventory, assortment, and delivery risk that individual retailers can't handle alone.

Why an investor cares: this is a distribution business bolted onto one of the most import- and tariff-exposed categories in the U.S. economy. Roughly 99% of shoes sold in the United States are imported [7], and footwear carries some of the highest import duties in the entire tariff schedule [8]. That makes the wholesale layer a leveraged bet on trade policy, consumer discretionary spending, and brand fashion cycles all at once.

Ways in. For public-market investors, there is essentially one pure-play footwear wholesaler of any size (Weyco Group), so most exposure comes through brand companies that run large wholesale operations alongside their own stores and websites — Deckers, Crocs, Steven Madden, Wolverine Worldwide, Caleres and others. For private investors, the industry is dominated by family-owned importer-distributors and by private-equity and holding-company owners (3G Capital, Berkshire Hathaway, Authentic Brands Group). Details in sections 4 and 10.

2. What it is and how it's structured

Scope. NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 424340 covers establishments primarily engaged in the merchant wholesale distribution of leather, rubber, and other footwear, including ordinary athletic footwear [26]. "Merchant" means they take title to (own) the goods — that is what separates them from agents and brokers who only arrange sales for a commission.

What it excludes (and the adjacent codes to know):

• 316210 — Footwear Manufacturing: firms that actually make shoes. Note that many U.S. "brands" that outsource all production are still classified here or under their own retail, not under 424340 (see section 3).
• 458210 — Shoe Retailers: stores that sell to the public (this is the NAICS 2022 code for what used to be called shoe stores).
• 425120 — Wholesale Trade Agents and Brokers: footwear sales reps and buying agents who never take title.
• 424330 — Women's, Children's, and Infants' Clothing and Accessories Merchant Wholesalers: covers hosiery and accessories, adjacent to footwear.
• Sporting-goods wholesaling: specialty athletic footwear — golf shoes, bowling shoes, cleated footwear and similar products — is classified under sporting-goods wholesaling rather than 424340 [26].

Ownership mix. The industry is a barbell. At one end sit a small number of large, professionally run importer-distributors and the wholesale arms of branded shoe companies. At the other sit hundreds of small, often family-owned import houses that specialize by category (kids', western/work boots, comfort, fashion, private label). The federal data below show a moderately concentrated industry: the top firms take a large share, but there is a long tail of small operators. There is very little unionized labor and almost no domestic manufacturing left in the picture — the jobs here are white-collar sourcing, sales, logistics, and finance roles, which is why average pay is high for a "wholesale" industry (see section 3).

3. How big it is

Federal statistics for NAICS 424340 (U.S.):

Concentration is moderate and rising toward the top of the list: the four largest firms account for 43.7% of receipts, the top eight for 56.2%, the top twenty for 73.1%, and the top fifty for 86% [2]. (The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, a standard concentration measure, is suppressed in the federal data and so is not reported here.) A private-research estimate corroborates the scale, putting U.S. footwear wholesaling revenue near $46.7 billion in 2026 after roughly flat (about 0.9% annual) growth over the prior five years [4].

The undercount caveat — important here. These figures capture the independent distribution/importer layer, not the whole flow of footwear at wholesale. Most of the biggest names that move shoes into U.S. retail — Nike, adidas, New Balance, Skechers, Deckers, Crocs, Wolverine — are "factoryless" brand marketers that design and source shoes but outsource production, and Census generally classifies them under footwear manufacturing (316210) or under their own retail rather than under 424340. Nike, for example, states that nearly all its products are made by independent contractors and nearly all footwear is manufactured outside the United States, yet products are sold both through Nike Direct and wholesale accounts [27]. A Nike sales office or distribution establishment may be classified in wholesale trade, while the listed parent reports a global combination of wholesale, owned stores, e-commerce, apparel and equipment. So the $43.5 billion and the ~1,150 firm count materially understate the true economic footprint of footwear wholesaling. For context, the total U.S. footwear market at retail is roughly $89–97 billion [5][23], and U.S. footwear imports alone were $26.6 billion at customs value in 2025 [6]. The NAICS 424340 receipts figure is best read as the revenue of the pure distributors, not the industry's full wholesale throughput.

4. The investable universe

There is only one meaningful pure-play public footwear wholesaler. Most public exposure comes through vertically integrated brand companies whose businesses include large wholesale segments (and which federal data often file under manufacturing, per section 3). Figures are most-recent full fiscal year.

Major private and other owners. The private side is large and where much of the pure-distribution activity actually sits:

• 3G Capital took Skechers private in 2025 for about $9.4 billion ($63/share) — the largest footwear buyout on record; the transaction closed September 12, 2025 and shares ceased trading on the NYSE [10][31].
• Berkshire Hathaway owns a cluster of footwear wholesalers: Brooks Running, Justin Brands (western/work boots), and H.H. Brown Shoe Group.
• Authentic Brands Group (ABG) owns and licenses footwear brands (Reebok, Sperry, Vince Camuto), running an asset-light model where licensees do the actual wholesaling.
• New Balance is privately held.
• A long tail of family-owned importer-distributors — for example Vida Shoes International, Marc Fisher Footwear, BBC International (kids'), ELAN Polo, and Titan — are the classic 424340 businesses: they source finished shoes abroad and sell them to U.S. retailers, often including private-label programs.

Bottom line for public investors: if you want footwear-wholesale exposure, you are mostly buying branded shoe companies, not distributors — and Weyco is the only small-cap that is mainly a wholesaler.

5. How the money works

A footwear wholesaler's economics are a distribution spread wrapped around a lot of working capital and a very large duty bill.

The core spread. The wholesaler pays a factory (almost always in Asia) an FOB ("free on board," i.e. ex-factory) price, then adds ocean/air freight, U.S. import duty, and warehousing to get a landed cost. It resells to retailers at a wholesale price. Gross margin is the gap. For a branded wholesaler this runs in the mid-30s percent — though Steven Madden's wholesale-footwear gross margin fell to 33.5% in 2025 from 34.6% in 2024, with management attributing the decline principally to U.S. import tariffs [30]. The operating margin likewise compressed, from 18.0% to 14.9%, on tariff costs plus expense deleverage and marketing investment [30]. Commodity and private-label distributors run thinner (often 15–25%), where retailers squeeze harder [21].

Duty is a cost line, not a footnote. Because footwear tariffs average about 23.6% (versus 7.8% for consumer goods generally) and can exceed 60% on some styles [8], import duty is one of the largest items between factory and shelf. A change in tariff policy flows almost dollar-for-dollar into landed cost, and wholesalers must decide whether to eat it (margin hit), pass it on (volume risk), or re-source to a cheaper country. This is the single biggest lever on profitability in the industry.

Inventory quality drives margin as much as the wholesale spread. Nike's fiscal 2025 results illustrate the mechanism: consolidated gross margin fell 190 basis points to 42.7%, with lower average selling prices — driven mainly by discounts and channel mix — reducing margin by approximately 180 basis points and inventory-obsolescence reserves reducing it by another ~90 basis points, only partially offset by lower product costs [27]. Profitability can move more on sell-through, markdowns, and inventory reserves than on warehouse payroll.

Working capital is the business. Distributors pay duty and freight at import, hold seasonal inventory (fall boots, spring sandals) for months, and extend payment terms to retailers. So the model ties up cash in inventory and receivables; the metrics that matter are inventory turns, sell-through, order fill rate, and the cash conversion cycle. Slow-moving fashion inventory forces markdowns, which is how a good gross margin turns into a bad net margin. Steven Madden describes estimating markdown allowances using retailer inventory, sell-through and gross-margin data — underscoring how reported revenue and profitability depend on downstream retail performance [30].

Where the extra dollars come from. Beyond the basic spread, wholesalers earn more by (1) running private-label / brand-licensing programs for retailers (higher volume, sometimes higher margin — a growth area for Steven Madden [30]); (2) owning brands with pricing power (Hoka, Ugg, Birkenstock) rather than distributing commodity shoes; and (3) adding their own direct-to-consumer (DTC) channel, which captures the retail margin too. The counter-trend — brands pulling back from wholesale to sell direct — is the main threat to the independent distribution layer (section 8).

6. What drives demand

• Consumer discretionary spending, jobs, and income. Footwear is a modest but recurring household outlay — the average American buys about 5.39 pairs a year and spends roughly $350 [17]. When budgets tighten, consumers trade down (helping off-price and value distributors) rather than stop buying.
• The replacement cycle. Shoes wear out; this gives the category a floor that pure fashion apparel lacks. Athletic and "athleisure" adoption has raised pairs-per-person over the last decade.
• Brand heat and fashion cycles. A hot brand or silhouette (Hoka and On in performance running, Crocs and Birkenstock in casual, Ugg in comfort) can lift a distributor's whole book — and cool just as fast. Fashion risk cuts both ways.
• Seasonality and weather. Boots in fall/winter, sandals in spring/summer, plus back-to-school and holiday peaks, drive the ordering calendar and the inventory build.
• Channel shift to e-commerce. Online is now the largest single channel at roughly a third of footwear sales [5], which reshapes who the wholesaler sells to (marketplaces and pure-plays, not just brick-and-mortar).
• Demographics. Kids' footwear tracks births and school enrollment; work-boot demand tracks industrial, construction, and agricultural employment.
• Athletic/lifestyle blurring. Nike explicitly notes that although its athletic shoes are designed for sports, a large percentage are worn for casual or leisure use [27]. This blurring of athletic, casual, and fashion footwear has favored brands with technical credibility and everyday comfort positioning.

Cyclicality is real. In 2020, U.S. footwear imports fell 23.7% to $20.7 billion while consumer spending on clothing and footwear fell 7.7%; factory closures, shipping delays, and weak demand all contributed. In 2021, footwear imports rebounded 31.4% to $27.2 billion and consumer footwear spending rose 29.8% as restrictions eased [32][33]. Wholesale cycles are amplified by retailer inventory corrections: retailers can reduce orders faster than consumers reduce purchases, leaving suppliers with excess goods and markdown support.

7. Regulation

Footwear wholesalers are lightly regulated as businesses but heavily exposed as importers.

• Tariffs (Harmonized Tariff Schedule, HTS Chapter 64). The defining regulatory cost. Base rates on footwear are unusually high and were layered with new charges in 2025: a broad reciprocal/"Section 122" surcharge on most origins, a 20% U.S. tariff on Vietnamese goods effective August 7, 2025 (with a punitive 40% rate on goods transshipped through Vietnam), and China-specific Section 301 duties of 7.5–25% stacked on top [6][9]. Industry importers paid about $6.22 billion in footwear duties in 2025 [6]. Duty exposure varies by detailed HTS classification, material, construction, and source country; USTR's tariff tool determines Section 301 exposure at the eight- or ten-digit HTS level [34].
• Country-of-origin marking (U.S. Customs and Border Protection, CBP). Imported footwear must be permanently and conspicuously marked with its country of origin; unmarked goods face an additional 10% ad valorem duty [18].
• Children's products (Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, CPSIA; enforced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, CPSC). Footwear for children 12 and under must meet lead limits (100 parts per million in accessible components), carry tracking labels, and be covered by a Children's Product Certificate [18][35]. Ordinary adult shoes are generally exempt from apparel flammability testing.
• Labeling and "Made in USA" claims (Federal Trade Commission, FTC). A shoe may be marketed as Made in USA only if it is "all or virtually all" made domestically [22]. The FTC brought a 2026 enforcement action against a footwear company over allegedly false "Made in USA" claims involving imported uppers and outsoles [36]. The FTC's Leather Guides also prohibit misleading claims about leather and imitation-leather composition [37].
• Forced-labor enforcement (Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, UFLPA). CBP can detain footwear whose inputs are linked to China's Xinjiang region or listed entities, applying a rebuttable presumption and placing substantial documentation burden on importers [38].
• Government procurement (Berry Amendment). Military combat footwear must be made from domestic materials, a niche that supports a small domestic manufacturing base separate from the import channel [20].
• State chemical rules (e.g., California Proposition 65) require warnings on certain chemical contents.

8. Competitive dynamics and consolidation

The center of gravity is shifting away from the independent middleman. Three forces:

1. Brand direct-to-consumer (DTC) disintermediation. The most powerful brands increasingly sell through their own stores, websites, and a tighter set of wholesale partners, cutting marginal accounts. Ugg, for instance, is consolidating around its best partners and closing wholesale doors, while its sister brand Hoka still adds doors selectively [22]. Crocs' wholesale channel declined from 52.0% of consolidated revenue in 2023 to 47.9% in 2025 [29], illustrating the channel-mix shift. Every account a brand pulls in-house is volume a distributor loses. That said, the path is not one-way: Nike's recent decision to reinvest in wholesale distribution after overemphasizing direct channels shows that physical retail reach, merchandising, and multi-brand discovery retain value [27].
2. Retail concentration and off-price strength. Buyers are consolidated (national chains, department stores, and off-price giants like TJX, Ross, and Burlington), which squeezes wholesale margins; value and off-price channels have been resilient through soft consumer years.
3. Ownership consolidation. The financial owners are getting bigger and more sophisticated: 3G Capital's ~$9.4 billion take-private of Skechers in 2025 [10][31], Steven Madden's push into private-label and its 2025 acquisition of Kurt Geiger, Wolverine's divestiture of brands (Sperry to Authentic Brands Group), and Authentic Brands Group's roll-up of footwear licenses all point to scale and brand ownership winning over undifferentiated distribution.

Concentration in the pure-distribution NAICS is moderate (top four firms ~44% of receipts) but the effective competitive set is far more concentrated once the mega-brands that file elsewhere are included [2].

9. Risks

• Trade-policy shock (the dominant risk). With ~99% of shoes imported [7] and duties already the highest of most consumer categories, any tariff increase hits landed cost immediately. The 2025 tariff actions on Vietnam, China, and Indonesia — the top three sourcing countries — raised costs across the board [6]. Steven Madden's 2025 segment results provide direct evidence that tariff costs were not fully neutralized [30].
• Sourcing concentration. Supply is clustered in a few countries. By import value in 2024, China supplied 35.8%, Vietnam 32.4%, and Indonesia 9.3% [39]; by volume in 2025, China accounted for 47.8% of the 2.015 billion pairs imported, Vietnam 28.5%, and Indonesia 9.6% [7]. A disruption or tariff in any one is hard to reroute quickly, and shoe factories are not easily relocated. Even a very large buyer retains meaningful facility concentration — Nike's largest footwear factory produced approximately 11% of Nike Brand footwear in fiscal 2025 [27].
• Channel disintermediation. Brands going DTC and Amazon's scale can bypass the wholesaler entirely (section 8).
• Fashion and inventory risk. Wrong assortment or a missed trend forces markdowns that erase the distribution spread; the model carries months of seasonal inventory.
• Consumer cyclicality. Footwear is discretionary; in downturns unit volumes and mix (fewer premium pairs) both weaken.
• Customer credit risk. Distributors extend terms to retailers; a retail bankruptcy can wipe out receivables.
• Freight and input-cost volatility. Ocean-freight spikes and materials costs move landed cost independently of duty. Footwear inputs include natural and synthetic rubber, plastic compounds, foam cushioning, natural and synthetic leather, nylon, polyester, textiles, and polyurethane films — all subject to shortages and price swings [27].

10. How to invest and the outlook

Public routes. Direct exposure to pure footwear wholesaling is scarce — Weyco Group (WEYS) is the only small-cap that is mainly a wholesaler [11]. Broader public exposure comes through branded shoe companies with large wholesale segments: Deckers (DECK) and Crocs (CROX) for brand-heat and margin; Steven Madden (SHOO) for fashion plus a growing private-label wholesale book; Wolverine Worldwide (WWW), Caleres (CAL), Genesco (GCO), Designer Brands (DBI), Rocky Brands (RCKY), and Birkenstock (BIRK) for various brand and channel mixes. Investors weighing these names look at wholesale-segment revenue and gross margin, DTC penetration, inventory turns, and — above all — tariff exposure by sourcing country. (Tickers, share prices, and multiples belong to this section only; the industry itself is a distribution business, not a stock-market sector.)

Private routes. Most of the industry is private. Access comes through private equity (3G's Skechers being the marquee example [31]), family-owned importer-distributors (Vida Shoes, Marc Fisher, BBC International and peers), diversified holding companies (Berkshire Hathaway's footwear group), and brand-licensing platforms (Authentic Brands Group). These are the businesses that most closely match the NAICS 424340 definition, and they change hands through private M&A rather than public markets. Private-company diligence should center on retailer and supplier concentration, gross margin after freight and duties, inventory aging by style and size, cancellation and markdown-allowance history, returns, receivable quality, borrowing-base availability, order lead times, license duration, trademark ownership, factory compliance, and the ability to raise prices without losing shelf space.

Near-term drivers and outlook (forward-looking):

• Tariffs are the swing factor. The direction of U.S. duty policy on Vietnam, China, and Indonesia will do more to shape 2026–2027 margins than any consumer trend; the industry's trade group has called the 2025 increases severe [6]. Expect continued re-sourcing toward lower-tariff countries and more cost pass-through.
• Consolidation should continue. Scale, brand ownership, and licensing look likely to keep winning over undifferentiated distribution; more take-privates and roll-ups are plausible.
• DTC pressure persists. The independent wholesale layer is likely to keep ceding ground to brand-direct channels, favoring distributors that own brands, run private-label programs, or add their own DTC.
• Value and replacement demand provide a floor. Because shoes wear out and consumers trade down rather than stop buying, off-price and value-oriented distribution should stay comparatively resilient even in a soft-spending environment.

The reasonable read is an industry with steady end demand but structurally thin, tariff-exposed economics — one where the profits increasingly accrue to brand owners and large financial sponsors rather than to the classic independent shoe distributor.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns (2023), NAICS 424340. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp.html
2. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 Economic Census — Comparative Statistics / Concentration, NAICS 424340 (receipts, firm count, CR4/CR8/CR20/CR50). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census.html
3. U.S. Small Business Administration, Table of Small Business Size Standards (2023), NAICS 424340. https://www.sba.gov/document/support-table-size-standards
4. IBISWorld, Footwear Wholesaling in the US (2026). https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/industry/footwear-wholesaling/969/
5. Statista, Footwear market in the United States — statistics & facts (2025). https://www.statista.com/topics/4704/us-footwear-market/
6. Eightx, Footwear Import and Tariff Tracker 2026 (import values by country, duties paid, 2025). https://eightx.co/blog/footwear-import-tariff-tracker-2026
7. Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA), Sourcing & Compliance / Footwear Retail (share of U.S. footwear imported; pairs imported). https://fdra.org/key-issues-and-advocacy/sourcing-compliance/
8. US Tariff Rates, Chapter 64: Footwear — 2026 US Tariff Rates & HTS Codes (average and peak duty rates). https://ustariffrates.com/tariffs/64
9. CNBC, Trump Vietnam, China tariffs could raise prices for Nike, Wayfair (2025). https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/02/trump-tariffs-on-vietnam-could-raise-prices-for-shoes-furniture-toys.html
10. Skechers, Skechers Agrees to Be Acquired by 3G Capital (2025). https://about.skechers.com/press-release/skechers-agrees-to-be-acquired-by-3g-capital
11. Weyco Group, Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results, GlobeNewswire (2025). https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/03/04/3036941/0/en/Weyco-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results.html
12. [Replaced by updated source; see 30]
13. [Replaced by updated source; see 28]
14. Crocs, Inc., Form 8-K FY2024 (full-year revenue). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1334036/000133403624000012/exhibit991pressrelease1824.htm
15. FashionNetwork USA, Caleres reports 3.4% sales decline in 2024. https://us.fashionnetwork.com/news/Caleres-reports-3-4-sales-decline-in-2024,1714172.html
16. Fibre2Fashion, Wolverine Worldwide's FY24 revenue falls, gross margin improves. https://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/company-reports-news/us-wolverine-worldwide-s-fy24-revenue-falls-gross-margin-improves-300908-newsdetails.htm
17. RunRepeat, US Footwear Market / Shoe Consumption Statistics (pairs per person, annual spend). https://runrepeat.com/us-footwear-market-statistics
18. Compliance Gate, Shoes and Footwear Regulations in the United States: An Overview (marking, CPSIA). https://www.compliancegate.com/shoes-and-footwear-regulations-united-states/
19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), NISTIR 8116 — A Guide to United States Footwear Compliance Requirements. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8116.pdf
20. Congressional Research Service, Domestic Preference Statutes: The Berry Amendment and the Kissell Amendment (IF13001). https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13001
21. NicheDropshipping / footwear-distribution trade sources, wholesale vs. retail pricing and margins. https://nichedropshipping.com/dropship-shoes-suppliers/
22. WWD (Women's Wear Daily), Deckers Brands: Ugg, Hoka distribution strategy (wholesale door strategy). https://wwd.com/footwear-news/shoe-industry-news/deckers-brands-ugg-hoka-hiking-trail-run-distribution-channels-promotions-1238805649/
23. PRIME AI, Shifting US Footwear Market: Trends & Opportunities 2024 (total market size). https://www.prime-ai.com/en/media/us-footwear-market-2024-shifting-landscape-ssf-a/
24. Genesco Inc., Fiscal 2024 results (net sales ~$2.3B), via FDRA/SEC. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/18498/000095017024036902/gco-20240203.htm
25. Designer Brands Inc., Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2024 Results (~$3.0B revenue). https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/designer-brands-inc-reports-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2024-financial-results-302406183.html
26. U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 NAICS Definition — 424340 Footwear Merchant Wholesalers. https://www.census.gov/naics/?details=42434&input=42434&year=2022
27. Nike, Inc., Form 10-K FY2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320187/000032018725000047/nke-20250531.htm
28. Deckers Brands, Form 10-K FY2026 (fiscal year ended March 2026; wholesale/DTC and brand net sales). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/910521/000162828026037664/deck-20260331.htm
29. Crocs, Inc., Form 10-K FY2025 (wholesale channel share). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1334036/000133403626000006/crox-20251231.htm
30. Steven Madden, Ltd., Form 10-K FY2025 (wholesale footwear revenue, gross margin, operating margin). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/913241/000162828026012995/shoo-20251231.htm
31. Skechers, 3G Capital Completes Acquisition of Skechers (September 2025). https://about.skechers.com/press-release/3g-capital-completes-acquisition-of-skechers
32. U.S. International Trade Commission, Footwear: U.S. Industry & Trade, 2020. https://www.usitc.gov/research_and_analysis/tradeshifts/2020/footwear.htm
33. U.S. International Trade Commission, Footwear: U.S. Industry & Trade, 2021. https://www.usitc.gov/research_and_analysis/tradeshifts/2021/footwear
34. U.S. Trade Representative, Section 301 Tariff Actions Search. https://www.ustr.gov/issue-areas/enforcement/section-301-investigations/search
35. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Importer Certification Requirements (2025). https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Certification-Imp-Rqmts-E-filing-Recalls-FINAL-VERSION-WEBSITE-1-7-2025.pdf
36. Federal Trade Commission, FTC Announces 'Made in USA' Sweep (April 2026). https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/04/ftc-announces-made-usa-sweep-including-three-law-enforcement-actions-protect-american-consumers
37. Federal Trade Commission, Guides for the Leather Industry. https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/rules/leather-guides
38. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Guidance. https://www.help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article1842
39. U.S. International Trade Commission, Footwear Trade Figures 2024. https://www.usitc.gov/system/files/research_and_analysis/tradeshifts/2024/files/footwear_figures.html